{"title":"Service at risk in delivery operations","authors":"Mert Hakan Hekimoğlu, John H. Park, Burak Kazaz","doi":"10.1111/deci.12577","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article examines disruption risks at fulfillment centers and develops risk mitigation strategies based on inventory stocking and delivery decisions. It considers a Fortune 150 firm whose delivery operations are designed to fulfill the orders from contracted business customers within the next day. The firm promises its customers that the probability of late deliveries exceeding a certain threshold will be limited. We coin this requirement as the service-at-risk (SaR) constraint. The firm proactively determines the inventory amount to be kept in each fulfillment center. If a disruption occurs, the firm determines the best way to deliver orders from its operational fulfillment centers and vendors under disruption length and demand uncertainty to minimize additional costs and satisfy the SaR constraint. This article makes four main contributions. First, we find a surprising result that total inventory commitment can decrease with risk aversion when there exists a disruption possibility that impacts two nearby facilities together. Using actual data from the motivating firm, the numerical analysis demonstrates that this phenomenon exists in practice. Second, we define a new metric: The Risk Dispersion Index (RDI), which measures the dispersion in risk exposure across fulfillment centers. It leads to a lower and more balanced risk exposure in the firm's delivery operations. Third, we find that a facility may elect to abandon its own customers to serve the customers of a disrupted facility; this behavior becomes more prominent under risk aversion. Fourth, the introduction of demand uncertainty leads to a smaller inventory commitment for a risk-neutral retailer.</p>","PeriodicalId":48256,"journal":{"name":"DECISION SCIENCES","volume":"55 1","pages":"33-56"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DECISION SCIENCES","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/deci.12577","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This article examines disruption risks at fulfillment centers and develops risk mitigation strategies based on inventory stocking and delivery decisions. It considers a Fortune 150 firm whose delivery operations are designed to fulfill the orders from contracted business customers within the next day. The firm promises its customers that the probability of late deliveries exceeding a certain threshold will be limited. We coin this requirement as the service-at-risk (SaR) constraint. The firm proactively determines the inventory amount to be kept in each fulfillment center. If a disruption occurs, the firm determines the best way to deliver orders from its operational fulfillment centers and vendors under disruption length and demand uncertainty to minimize additional costs and satisfy the SaR constraint. This article makes four main contributions. First, we find a surprising result that total inventory commitment can decrease with risk aversion when there exists a disruption possibility that impacts two nearby facilities together. Using actual data from the motivating firm, the numerical analysis demonstrates that this phenomenon exists in practice. Second, we define a new metric: The Risk Dispersion Index (RDI), which measures the dispersion in risk exposure across fulfillment centers. It leads to a lower and more balanced risk exposure in the firm's delivery operations. Third, we find that a facility may elect to abandon its own customers to serve the customers of a disrupted facility; this behavior becomes more prominent under risk aversion. Fourth, the introduction of demand uncertainty leads to a smaller inventory commitment for a risk-neutral retailer.
本文探讨了履约中心的中断风险,并根据库存备货和交付决策制定了风险缓解策略。文章考虑了一家财富 150 强公司,该公司的交付业务旨在第二天内完成签约企业客户的订单。该公司向其客户承诺,延迟交付的概率超过某一阈值的情况将受到限制。我们将这一要求称为风险服务(SaR)约束。公司主动确定每个履行中心的库存量。如果发生中断,企业会确定在中断时间和需求不确定的情况下,从其运营的履行中心和供应商处交付订单的最佳方式,以尽量减少额外成本并满足 SaR 约束。本文有四大贡献。首先,我们发现了一个令人惊讶的结果,即当存在同时影响附近两个设施的中断可能性时,总库存承诺会随着风险规避而减少。通过使用激励公司的实际数据,数值分析证明了这一现象在实践中是存在的。其次,我们定义了一个新指标:风险分散指数(RDI),用于衡量各履行中心的风险分散程度。它能使公司配送业务的风险敞口更低、更均衡。第三,我们发现,设施可能会选择放弃自己的客户,而为受干扰设施的客户提供服务;在风险规避的情况下,这种行为会变得更加突出。第四,需求不确定性的引入会导致风险中性的零售商做出较小的库存承诺。
期刊介绍:
Decision Sciences, a premier journal of the Decision Sciences Institute, publishes scholarly research about decision making within the boundaries of an organization, as well as decisions involving inter-firm coordination. The journal promotes research advancing decision making at the interfaces of business functions and organizational boundaries. The journal also seeks articles extending established lines of work assuming the results of the research have the potential to substantially impact either decision making theory or industry practice. Ground-breaking research articles that enhance managerial understanding of decision making processes and stimulate further research in multi-disciplinary domains are particularly encouraged.