Profiles of Well-Being Among Early Childhood Educators

IF 2.1 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Amy M. Roberts, Alexandra M. Daro, Kathleen C. Gallagher
{"title":"Profiles of Well-Being Among Early Childhood Educators","authors":"Amy M. Roberts, Alexandra M. Daro, Kathleen C. Gallagher","doi":"10.1080/10409289.2023.2173463","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Research Findings: This study used a person-centered data analytic approach to identify distinct subgroups of early childhood educators (n= 133) based on their responses to multiple indicators of well-being (psychological, financial, and health indicators). Various fit indices established a two-class solution. Specifically, one group was characterized by more positive well-being and the other by less positive well-being. Subgroup differences were the greatest for indicators of psychological well-being, including self-care and self-compassion. In addition, educators with less than a bachelor’s degree, working as assistant teachers, receiving less pay, with more adverse childhood experiences, were overrepresented in the less positive well-being group, demonstrating system inequities and opportunities for improvement.Practice or Policy: These findings have implications for supporting the early care and education workforce. Specifically, findings suggest psychological well-being, including self-care and self-compassion, may be relevant focus areas for organizational and systems change efforts or interventions. Furthermore, findings suggest that trauma-informed approaches and support for assistant teachers are particularly important to promote equity and well-being across the workforce.","PeriodicalId":11448,"journal":{"name":"Early Education and Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Early Education and Development","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2023.2173463","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Research Findings: This study used a person-centered data analytic approach to identify distinct subgroups of early childhood educators (n= 133) based on their responses to multiple indicators of well-being (psychological, financial, and health indicators). Various fit indices established a two-class solution. Specifically, one group was characterized by more positive well-being and the other by less positive well-being. Subgroup differences were the greatest for indicators of psychological well-being, including self-care and self-compassion. In addition, educators with less than a bachelor’s degree, working as assistant teachers, receiving less pay, with more adverse childhood experiences, were overrepresented in the less positive well-being group, demonstrating system inequities and opportunities for improvement.Practice or Policy: These findings have implications for supporting the early care and education workforce. Specifically, findings suggest psychological well-being, including self-care and self-compassion, may be relevant focus areas for organizational and systems change efforts or interventions. Furthermore, findings suggest that trauma-informed approaches and support for assistant teachers are particularly important to promote equity and well-being across the workforce.
幼儿教育工作者的幸福状况
摘要研究结果:本研究采用以人为中心的数据分析方法,根据幼儿教育工作者对多种幸福指标(心理、财务和健康指标)的反应,确定了不同的亚组(n=133)。各种拟合指数建立了两类解决方案。具体而言,一组的特点是更积极的幸福感,另一组的特征是不那么积极的幸福。心理健康指标的亚组差异最大,包括自我照顾和自我同情。此外,学士学位以下、担任助理教师、工资较低、童年经历较多的教育工作者在不太积极的幸福感群体中所占比例过高,这表明了制度的不公平性和改进的机会。实践或政策:这些发现对支持早期护理和教育工作人员具有启示意义。具体而言,研究结果表明,心理健康,包括自我照顾和自我同情,可能是组织和系统变革努力或干预的相关重点领域。此外,研究结果表明,基于创伤的方法和对助理教师的支持对于促进整个劳动力队伍的公平和福祉尤为重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
10.30%
发文量
78
期刊介绍: Early Education and Development (EE&D) is a professional journal for those involved in educational and preschool services and research related to children and their families: early education supervisors, school psychologists, daycare administrators, child development specialists, developmental and child clinical psychologists, and special education administrators. It is designed to emphasize the implications for practice of research and solid scientific information. The age range focused upon is preschool through the primary grades. EE&D is a connecting link between the research community in early education and child development and school district early education programs, daycare systems, and special needs preschool programs.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信