A trialectical approach to understanding ‘classroom readiness’ for teaching literacy

IF 1.9 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
S. Stewart, E. Stratford, Kitty te Riele
{"title":"A trialectical approach to understanding ‘classroom readiness’ for teaching literacy","authors":"S. Stewart, E. Stratford, Kitty te Riele","doi":"10.1080/0158037X.2021.1900096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Initial teacher education is subject to substantial scrutiny and, fuelled by concerns about teacher ‘quality,’ its ‘effectiveness’ is frequently called into question, not least in relation to ideas about ‘classroom readiness.’ Mandated by policymakers, assessed by teacher educators, and struggled with by novice teachers, classroom readiness is experienced and understood in different ways. Our three-year qualitative research project on literacy teaching practice and preparing teachers for such ends in one Australian state confirmed that many novice teachers feel ill-equipped for the task despite best efforts among teacher educators. This article reports on those findings by taking a spatial approach to explore what it means to be ‘classroom-ready’ for teaching literacy. Building on Lefebvre’s [(1991). The Production of Space. Translated by D. Nicholson-Smith. Oxford: Blackwell] trialectical approach to perceived, conceived, and lived space, we consider the multiple perspectives simultaneously at play in shaping understandings and experiences of classroom readiness for teaching literacy. We argue the need to rethink ideas about classroom readiness not as an endpoint achieved on graduation but as a non-linear ongoing process of ‘becoming’ that could foster a generative new ‘thirdspace’ for teacher learning.","PeriodicalId":46790,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Continuing Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/0158037X.2021.1900096","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Continuing Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2021.1900096","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Initial teacher education is subject to substantial scrutiny and, fuelled by concerns about teacher ‘quality,’ its ‘effectiveness’ is frequently called into question, not least in relation to ideas about ‘classroom readiness.’ Mandated by policymakers, assessed by teacher educators, and struggled with by novice teachers, classroom readiness is experienced and understood in different ways. Our three-year qualitative research project on literacy teaching practice and preparing teachers for such ends in one Australian state confirmed that many novice teachers feel ill-equipped for the task despite best efforts among teacher educators. This article reports on those findings by taking a spatial approach to explore what it means to be ‘classroom-ready’ for teaching literacy. Building on Lefebvre’s [(1991). The Production of Space. Translated by D. Nicholson-Smith. Oxford: Blackwell] trialectical approach to perceived, conceived, and lived space, we consider the multiple perspectives simultaneously at play in shaping understandings and experiences of classroom readiness for teaching literacy. We argue the need to rethink ideas about classroom readiness not as an endpoint achieved on graduation but as a non-linear ongoing process of ‘becoming’ that could foster a generative new ‘thirdspace’ for teacher learning.
理解识字教学“课堂准备”的三选择方法
最初的教师教育受到严格的审查,并且由于对教师“质量”的担忧,其“有效性”经常受到质疑,尤其是与“课堂准备”有关的想法。政策制定者要求,教师教育者评估,新手教师努力奋斗,课堂准备以不同的方式体验和理解。我们在澳大利亚的一个州进行了为期三年的关于读写教学实践和为教师做好准备的定性研究项目,该项目证实,尽管教师教育工作者尽了最大努力,但许多新教师仍觉得自己无法胜任这项任务。这篇文章报告了这些发现,通过采用空间方法来探索什么是“课堂准备”的教学素养。列斐伏尔的建筑[(1991)]。空间的产生。D. Nicholson-Smith译。牛津:Blackwell]对感知、构思和生活空间的试验方法,我们同时考虑了在塑造理解和课堂准备教学经验中发挥作用的多种视角。我们认为有必要重新思考课堂准备不是作为毕业时达到的终点,而是作为一个非线性的“成为”的持续过程,可以为教师学习培育一个新的“第三空间”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Studies in Continuing Education
Studies in Continuing Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: Studies in Continuing Education is a scholarly journal concerned with all aspects of continuing, professional and lifelong learning. It aims to be of special interest to those involved in: •continuing professional education •adults learning •staff development •training and development •human resource development
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信