The Slovenian School, Contributions and Current Debates: An Exploration from a Latin American Perspective

IF 0.1 0 PHILOSOPHY
Nicol A. Barria-Asenjo, H. Scholten, David Pavón‐Cuéllar, Jairo Gallo Acosta, Antonio Letelier, Jesús Ayala-Colqui
{"title":"The Slovenian School, Contributions and Current Debates: An Exploration from a Latin American Perspective","authors":"Nicol A. Barria-Asenjo, H. Scholten, David Pavón‐Cuéllar, Jairo Gallo Acosta, Antonio Letelier, Jesús Ayala-Colqui","doi":"10.15366/bp2023.32.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"After a brief reflection on the characteristics of the historiography of psychoanalysis in recent decades, this article aims to show certain dilemmas and/or debates that cross the psychoanalytic field both in the region and in the contemporary world. To this end, the focus will be placed on the campaign organized by Nina Krajnik in favor of the psychoanalytic clinic and against the theoretical psychoanalysis of Slavoj Žižek, Alenka Zupan?i? and Mladen Dolar. It is of particular interest to examine how Krajnik’s arguments are embedded in a broader project aiming both at an expansion of the World Association of Psychoanalysis (WAP) headed by Jacques- Alain Miller, and at obtaining a monopoly over psychoanalytic theory and its political effects. It will be shown that it is possible to find the first manifestations of this process in Latin America even before the WAP project. In this sense, based on the productions of Dolar, Zupancic and Žižek, some current contributions of the Slovenian school will be shown, which are taken up here in the light of the Latin American context, seeking to illuminate the theoretical, institutional, political, ideological and cultural implications of the domination and hegemony of the Millerian current in the psychoanalytic field. This logic of power, as will be seen, has not prevented the emergence and development of some radical and irreverent approaches which, nevertheless, seem to have failed: in some Latin American countries, such as Argentina, Millerian psychoanalysis managed to impose itself even more intensely than in France itself. This poses a challenge and a dilemma worthy of consideration and which must be taken up.","PeriodicalId":40614,"journal":{"name":"Bajo Palabra-Journal of Philosophy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bajo Palabra-Journal of Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15366/bp2023.32.013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

After a brief reflection on the characteristics of the historiography of psychoanalysis in recent decades, this article aims to show certain dilemmas and/or debates that cross the psychoanalytic field both in the region and in the contemporary world. To this end, the focus will be placed on the campaign organized by Nina Krajnik in favor of the psychoanalytic clinic and against the theoretical psychoanalysis of Slavoj Žižek, Alenka Zupan?i? and Mladen Dolar. It is of particular interest to examine how Krajnik’s arguments are embedded in a broader project aiming both at an expansion of the World Association of Psychoanalysis (WAP) headed by Jacques- Alain Miller, and at obtaining a monopoly over psychoanalytic theory and its political effects. It will be shown that it is possible to find the first manifestations of this process in Latin America even before the WAP project. In this sense, based on the productions of Dolar, Zupancic and Žižek, some current contributions of the Slovenian school will be shown, which are taken up here in the light of the Latin American context, seeking to illuminate the theoretical, institutional, political, ideological and cultural implications of the domination and hegemony of the Millerian current in the psychoanalytic field. This logic of power, as will be seen, has not prevented the emergence and development of some radical and irreverent approaches which, nevertheless, seem to have failed: in some Latin American countries, such as Argentina, Millerian psychoanalysis managed to impose itself even more intensely than in France itself. This poses a challenge and a dilemma worthy of consideration and which must be taken up.
斯洛文尼亚学派、贡献与当前争论:从拉丁美洲视角的探索
在对近几十年来精神分析史学的特点进行简要反思后,本文旨在展示该地区和当代世界中跨越精神分析领域的某些困境和/或争论。为此,重点将放在Nina Krajnik组织的支持精神分析诊所和反对Slavojžižek、Alenka Zupan的理论精神分析的运动上?我?和Mladen Dolar。研究Krajnik的论点是如何嵌入一个更广泛的项目中的,这一项目旨在扩大由Jacques-Alain Miller领导的世界心理分析协会(WAP),并获得对心理分析理论及其政治影响的垄断,这一点尤其令人感兴趣。这将表明,甚至在WAP项目之前,就有可能在拉丁美洲发现这一过程的最初表现。从这个意义上讲,基于多拉尔、祖潘契奇和日泽克的作品,将展示斯洛文尼亚学派目前的一些贡献,这些贡献将在这里结合拉丁美洲的背景进行讨论,试图阐明千禧流在精神分析领域的统治和霸权所带来的理论、制度、政治、意识形态和文化影响。正如将要看到的那样,这种权力逻辑并没有阻止一些激进和不敬的方法的出现和发展,尽管如此,这些方法似乎已经失败了:在一些拉丁美洲国家,如阿根廷,米利精神分析设法将自己强加于法国本身。这是一个值得考虑的挑战和困境,必须加以解决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信