{"title":"Gender differences in collaborative problem-solving skills in a cross-country perspective.","authors":"F. Borgonovi, S. Han, Samuel Greiff","doi":"10.1037/edu0000788","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Effective collaborative problem solving comprises cognitive dimensions, in which men tend to outperform women,andsocialdimensionsinwhichwomentendtooutperformmen.Weextendresearchonbetween-coun- trydifferencesingendergapsbyconsideringcollaborativeproblemsolvinganditsassociationwithtwoindi-cators of societal-level gender inequality. The first indicator reflects women ’ s underrepresentation in the labor market and politics. The second reflects women ’ s underrepresentation in stereotypically masculine fields and men ’ s underrepresentation in stereotypically feminine fields among university students. We use cross-country evidence on collaborative problem-solving skills among 15-year-oldstudents from44 countries ( N = 343,326) who participated in the 2015 Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA). Girls outperform boys in collaborative problem solving in all countries. Gender gaps in collaborative problem solving in favorof girls are less pronounced in countries wherewomen are especially underrepresented in the labor market and politics but more pronounced in countries where men and women are more likely to conform to gender stereotypes in selecting afield of studyat university. Societal-level genderequality plays a bigger role in explaining between-country differences in achievement in domains with a gender gap in favor of girls — such as collaborative problem solving and, to a lesser extent, reading — and a smaller role in explaining between-country differences in achievement in domains with a gender gap in favor of boys — such as mathematics.","PeriodicalId":48459,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Educational Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Educational Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000788","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Effective collaborative problem solving comprises cognitive dimensions, in which men tend to outperform women,andsocialdimensionsinwhichwomentendtooutperformmen.Weextendresearchonbetween-coun- trydifferencesingendergapsbyconsideringcollaborativeproblemsolvinganditsassociationwithtwoindi-cators of societal-level gender inequality. The first indicator reflects women ’ s underrepresentation in the labor market and politics. The second reflects women ’ s underrepresentation in stereotypically masculine fields and men ’ s underrepresentation in stereotypically feminine fields among university students. We use cross-country evidence on collaborative problem-solving skills among 15-year-oldstudents from44 countries ( N = 343,326) who participated in the 2015 Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA). Girls outperform boys in collaborative problem solving in all countries. Gender gaps in collaborative problem solving in favorof girls are less pronounced in countries wherewomen are especially underrepresented in the labor market and politics but more pronounced in countries where men and women are more likely to conform to gender stereotypes in selecting afield of studyat university. Societal-level genderequality plays a bigger role in explaining between-country differences in achievement in domains with a gender gap in favor of girls — such as collaborative problem solving and, to a lesser extent, reading — and a smaller role in explaining between-country differences in achievement in domains with a gender gap in favor of boys — such as mathematics.
期刊介绍:
The main purpose of the Journal of Educational Psychology® is to publish original, primary psychological research pertaining to education across all ages and educational levels. A secondary purpose of the Journal is the occasional publication of exceptionally important theoretical and review articles that are pertinent to educational psychology. Please note, the Journal does not typically publish reliability and validity studies of specific tests or assessment instruments.