The case of socially constructed knowledge through online collaborative reflection

IF 1.9 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Slaviša Radović, O. Firssova, Hans G. K. Hummel, Marjan Vermeulen
{"title":"The case of socially constructed knowledge through online collaborative reflection","authors":"Slaviša Radović, O. Firssova, Hans G. K. Hummel, Marjan Vermeulen","doi":"10.1080/0158037X.2022.2029389","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Although reflection has been characterised as a personal process, increased attention has been given to how the social context can enhance it. The present article examines how different levels of collaborative reflection influence learning processes and outcomes in higher education. We used a triangulation of quantitative and qualitative research methods to answer our research questions about this relation.Within the context of an Educational Sciences Master course, the findings from our study show that guiding students to share, read, and above discuss written answers on reflection assignments from others can be helpful for a deeper and broader understanding and a higher level of reflection. Discussing reflection from different perspectives was related to perceived satisfaction with the learning process and the motivation to learn. The implications of this research, such as the five phases for social knowledge construction, can be used to strengthen the relationship between reflection and collaboration.","PeriodicalId":46790,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Continuing Education","volume":"45 1","pages":"168 - 187"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Continuing Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2022.2029389","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT Although reflection has been characterised as a personal process, increased attention has been given to how the social context can enhance it. The present article examines how different levels of collaborative reflection influence learning processes and outcomes in higher education. We used a triangulation of quantitative and qualitative research methods to answer our research questions about this relation.Within the context of an Educational Sciences Master course, the findings from our study show that guiding students to share, read, and above discuss written answers on reflection assignments from others can be helpful for a deeper and broader understanding and a higher level of reflection. Discussing reflection from different perspectives was related to perceived satisfaction with the learning process and the motivation to learn. The implications of this research, such as the five phases for social knowledge construction, can be used to strengthen the relationship between reflection and collaboration.
通过在线协作反思的社会建构知识案例
摘要尽管反思被描述为一个个人过程,但人们越来越关注社会环境如何增强反思。本文探讨了不同水平的合作反思如何影响高等教育中的学习过程和结果。我们使用定量和定性研究方法的三角测量来回答我们关于这种关系的研究问题。在教育科学硕士课程的背景下,我们的研究结果表明,引导学生分享、阅读和讨论他人关于反思作业的书面答案,有助于更深入、更广泛的理解和更高水平的反思。从不同角度讨论反思与对学习过程的满意度和学习动机有关。本研究的启示,例如社会知识建构的五个阶段,可以用来加强反思和协作之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Studies in Continuing Education
Studies in Continuing Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: Studies in Continuing Education is a scholarly journal concerned with all aspects of continuing, professional and lifelong learning. It aims to be of special interest to those involved in: •continuing professional education •adults learning •staff development •training and development •human resource development
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信