Day-level relationships between work, physical activity, and well-being: Testing the physical activity-mediated demand-control (pamDC) model

IF 5.6 2区心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED

Work and Stress Pub Date : 2021-11-17 DOI:10.1080/02678373.2021.2002971

Sascha Abdel Hadi, A. Mojzisch, Stefan Krumm, J. Häusser

{"title":"Day-level relationships between work, physical activity, and well-being: Testing the physical activity-mediated demand-control (pamDC) model","authors":"Sascha Abdel Hadi, A. Mojzisch, Stefan Krumm, J. Häusser","doi":"10.1080/02678373.2021.2002971","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The physical activity-mediated Demand-Control model (Häusser, J. A., & Mojzisch, A. (2017). The physical activity-mediated Demand–Control (pamDC) model: Linking work characteristics, leisure time physical activity, and well-being. Work & Stress, 31(3), 209–232. doi:10.1080/02678373.2017.1303759) posits that leisure-time physical activity (LTPA) is an important variable mediating the effects of job characteristics on well-being. Building on this model, we hypothesise that day-specific job demands and job control predict LTPA after work (via self-regulation and self-determination). LTPA after work, in turn, is predicted to be positively related to evening well-being. We tested these hypotheses by conducting a 14-day ambulatory assessment study. A sample of 207 employees wore an accelerometer to monitor physical activity and answered, three times a day, questionnaires addressing job characteristics, self-regulatory capacity, self-determination, and well-being. Results show that day-specific job demands were negatively related to LTPA and different indicators of evening well-being. We also found evidence for the mediation of the relationship between day-specific job demands and evening well-being via LTPA after work. However, contrary to our predictions, job control was not related to LTPA on a daily basis. These findings help to advance theory and, in particular, to understand the importance of LTPA for employee well-being.","PeriodicalId":48199,"journal":{"name":"Work and Stress","volume":"36 1","pages":"355 - 376"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Work and Stress","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2021.2002971","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT The physical activity-mediated Demand-Control model (Häusser, J. A., & Mojzisch, A. (2017). The physical activity-mediated Demand–Control (pamDC) model: Linking work characteristics, leisure time physical activity, and well-being. Work & Stress, 31(3), 209–232. doi:10.1080/02678373.2017.1303759) posits that leisure-time physical activity (LTPA) is an important variable mediating the effects of job characteristics on well-being. Building on this model, we hypothesise that day-specific job demands and job control predict LTPA after work (via self-regulation and self-determination). LTPA after work, in turn, is predicted to be positively related to evening well-being. We tested these hypotheses by conducting a 14-day ambulatory assessment study. A sample of 207 employees wore an accelerometer to monitor physical activity and answered, three times a day, questionnaires addressing job characteristics, self-regulatory capacity, self-determination, and well-being. Results show that day-specific job demands were negatively related to LTPA and different indicators of evening well-being. We also found evidence for the mediation of the relationship between day-specific job demands and evening well-being via LTPA after work. However, contrary to our predictions, job control was not related to LTPA on a daily basis. These findings help to advance theory and, in particular, to understand the importance of LTPA for employee well-being.

查看原文本刊更多论文

工作、体力活动和幸福感之间的日常关系：测试体力活动介导的需求控制（pamDC）模型

摘要体力活动中介的需求控制模型（Häusser，J.A.，&Mojzisch，A.（2017）。身体活动介导的需求-控制（pamDC）模型：将工作特征、休闲时间的身体活动和幸福感联系起来。工作与压力，31（3），209–232。doi:10.1080/0267873.2017.1303759）认为，休闲时间体育活动（LTPA）是介导工作特征对幸福感影响的一个重要变量。在这个模型的基础上，我们假设特定日期的工作需求和工作控制可以预测下班后的LTPA（通过自我调节和自决）。反过来，人们预测下班后的LTPA与晚上的幸福感呈正相关。我们通过进行为期14天的动态评估研究来检验这些假设。207名员工的样本佩戴了加速计来监测身体活动，并每天回答三次关于工作特征、自我调节能力、自决能力和幸福感的问卷。结果显示，特定于白天的工作需求与LTPA和晚间幸福感的不同指标呈负相关。我们还发现，有证据表明，通过下班后的LTPA，白天特定的工作需求和晚上的幸福感之间存在中介关系。然而，与我们的预测相反，工作控制与日常LTPA无关。这些发现有助于推进理论，特别是理解LTPA对员工幸福感的重要性。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Work and Stress PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED-

CiteScore

11.70

自引率

3.30%

发文量

期刊介绍： Work & Stress is an international, multidisciplinary quarterly presenting high-quality papers concerned with the psychological, social and organizational aspects of occupational health and well-being, and stress and safety management. It is published in association with the European Academy of Occupational Health Psychology. The journal publishes empirical reports, scholarly reviews and theoretical papers. It is directed at occupational health psychologists, work and organizational psychologists, those involved with organizational development, and all concerned with the interplay of work, health and organisations. Research published in Work & Stress relates psychologically salient features of the work environment to their psychological, behavioural and health consequences, focusing on the underlying psychological processes. The journal has become a natural home for research on the work-family interface, social relations at work (including topics such as bullying and conflict at work, leadership and organizational support), workplace interventions and reorganizations, and dimensions and outcomes of worker stress and well-being. Such dimensions and outcomes, both positive and negative, include stress, burnout, sickness absence, work motivation, work engagement and work performance. Of course, submissions addressing other topics in occupational health psychology are also welcomed.