Relationship Between State-Level Developmental Screening and IDEA Part C Early Intervention Rates

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
D. Traube, M. R. Mamey
{"title":"Relationship Between State-Level Developmental Screening and IDEA Part C Early Intervention Rates","authors":"D. Traube, M. R. Mamey","doi":"10.1177/10538151211028232","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was to explore whether a relationship exists between the rates of state-level developmental screening by a health care provider and state-level provision of Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, Part C (IDEA Part C) early intervention services. This is an important first step in determining whether states have the capacity to deal with a potential influx of newly identified children. This analysis compared screening rates from the 2016 National Survey of Children’s Health with service rates from the Department of Education’s 2016 IDEA Part C data. There was no significant relationship between rates of screening by a health care provider and receipt of IDEA Part C services (r = .13, p = .366). Those who identified as White were screened and provided with IDEA services at a higher percentage than non-White (r = .80, p < .001). There was a significant relationship between region and receipt of IDEA Part C services, F(3) = 8.14, p < .001, with the Northeast region (M = 4.95, SD = 1.85) having higher percent served via IDEA Part C services. Results indicate no relationship between state levels of screening by a health care provider and receipt of IDEA Part C services. Efforts to increase developmental screening may require strategies to ensure adequate service access.","PeriodicalId":47360,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Early Intervention","volume":"44 1","pages":"299 - 310"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/10538151211028232","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Early Intervention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10538151211028232","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to explore whether a relationship exists between the rates of state-level developmental screening by a health care provider and state-level provision of Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, Part C (IDEA Part C) early intervention services. This is an important first step in determining whether states have the capacity to deal with a potential influx of newly identified children. This analysis compared screening rates from the 2016 National Survey of Children’s Health with service rates from the Department of Education’s 2016 IDEA Part C data. There was no significant relationship between rates of screening by a health care provider and receipt of IDEA Part C services (r = .13, p = .366). Those who identified as White were screened and provided with IDEA services at a higher percentage than non-White (r = .80, p < .001). There was a significant relationship between region and receipt of IDEA Part C services, F(3) = 8.14, p < .001, with the Northeast region (M = 4.95, SD = 1.85) having higher percent served via IDEA Part C services. Results indicate no relationship between state levels of screening by a health care provider and receipt of IDEA Part C services. Efforts to increase developmental screening may require strategies to ensure adequate service access.
国家级发育筛查与IDEA Part C早期干预率的关系
本研究的目的是探讨医疗保健提供者的州级发展筛查率与州级《残疾人教育法》第C部分(IDEA第C部分)早期干预服务之间是否存在关系。这是确定各州是否有能力应对可能涌入的新确认儿童的重要第一步。该分析将2016年全国儿童健康调查的筛查率与教育部2016年IDEA C部分数据的服务率进行了比较。医疗保健提供者的筛查率与接受IDEA C部分服务的比率之间没有显著关系(r=.13,p=.366)。那些被认定为白人的人接受了筛查,并以高于非白人的百分比提供了IDEA服务(r=.80,p<.001)。地区与接受IDEA C部分服务之间存在显著关系,F(3)=8.14,p<0.001,其中东北地区(M=4.95、SD=1.85)具有通过IDEA部分C服务提供的更高百分比。结果表明,卫生保健提供者的州筛查水平与接受IDEA C部分服务之间没有关系。增加发育筛查的努力可能需要制定战略,以确保获得充分的服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: The Journal of Early Intervention (JEI) publishes articles related to research and practice in early intervention for infants and young children with special needs and their families. Early intervention is defined broadly as procedures that facilitate the development of infants and young children who have special needs or who are at risk for developmental disabilities. The childhood years in which early intervention might occur begin at birth, or before birth for some prevention programs, and extend through the years in which children traditionally begin elementary school.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信