Ummah Imaginations in Plural Kerala: Being International in the Traditional Way

Q4 Arts and Humanities
Ulumuna Pub Date : 2021-12-31 DOI:10.20414/ujis.v25i2.456
M. A. Fathah
{"title":"Ummah Imaginations in Plural Kerala: Being International in the Traditional Way","authors":"M. A. Fathah","doi":"10.20414/ujis.v25i2.456","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Quranic ‘Ummah’ with its political and social sensibilities in a period of authoritatively heterogenetic counter-resurgences is significant for Muslims constituting minority in Kerala, India. However, ‘Ummah’ as an euphemism for state-centered political aspirations become endemic to them only in the last century. This tendency could be linked to literal scriptural interpretations, contempt for the technocratic and mystic traditions and the idea of sacred-geographies pushed inward by reformist movements since 1920s, which disjuncts with classical hermeneutic traditions followed by Keralite Ulama by their distinctive longue-durée to mainstream Muslims lands. Recently through a revivalist campaign, the traditional Ulama refurnished their monolithic concept of Ummah by reimagining and re-appropriating those sacred imaginaries from the puritanical-Islamist claim of the pure. An embedded Ummah locality – a mixture of local products and global variants – thus piggybacked on the structural and cultural forces of globalization, allowing Ulama to prudently redraw the boundaries of national culture and its ally, local Islam. Through this paper, I try to explicate how traditional Muslim scholarship in Kerala employed Quranic Ummah in the plural society while structurally re-embedding it with the global Muslim whole. A short reflection on the interpretive paradigm of puritanical-Islamist orientations on the concept of Ummah will be given along to place various paradigms in a comparative framework.","PeriodicalId":55654,"journal":{"name":"Ulumuna","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ulumuna","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20414/ujis.v25i2.456","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Quranic ‘Ummah’ with its political and social sensibilities in a period of authoritatively heterogenetic counter-resurgences is significant for Muslims constituting minority in Kerala, India. However, ‘Ummah’ as an euphemism for state-centered political aspirations become endemic to them only in the last century. This tendency could be linked to literal scriptural interpretations, contempt for the technocratic and mystic traditions and the idea of sacred-geographies pushed inward by reformist movements since 1920s, which disjuncts with classical hermeneutic traditions followed by Keralite Ulama by their distinctive longue-durée to mainstream Muslims lands. Recently through a revivalist campaign, the traditional Ulama refurnished their monolithic concept of Ummah by reimagining and re-appropriating those sacred imaginaries from the puritanical-Islamist claim of the pure. An embedded Ummah locality – a mixture of local products and global variants – thus piggybacked on the structural and cultural forces of globalization, allowing Ulama to prudently redraw the boundaries of national culture and its ally, local Islam. Through this paper, I try to explicate how traditional Muslim scholarship in Kerala employed Quranic Ummah in the plural society while structurally re-embedding it with the global Muslim whole. A short reflection on the interpretive paradigm of puritanical-Islamist orientations on the concept of Ummah will be given along to place various paradigms in a comparative framework.
多元喀拉拉邦的乌玛想象:以传统方式国际化
古兰经的“Ummah”及其政治和社会敏感性,在一个权威性的异质性反复兴时期,对印度喀拉拉邦的穆斯林来说意义重大。然而,“Ummah”作为以国家为中心的政治愿望的委婉说法,直到上个世纪才在他们身上流行起来。这种趋势可能与字面上的圣经解释、对技术官僚和神秘主义传统的蔑视以及自20世纪20年代以来改革派运动向内推动的神圣地理思想有关,这与喀拉拉邦人乌拉玛所遵循的经典解释学传统相脱节,因为他们对主流穆斯林土地的独特理解。最近,通过一场复兴运动,传统的乌拉马人通过重新想象和挪用清教伊斯兰主义者对纯洁的主张中的神圣想象,来驳斥他们对乌玛的单一概念。一个嵌入的乌玛地方——当地产品和全球变体的混合体——因此借助了全球化的结构和文化力量,使乌拉玛能够谨慎地重新划定民族文化及其盟友——当地伊斯兰教的边界。通过本文,我试图解释喀拉拉邦的传统穆斯林学术如何在多元社会中使用《古兰经》,同时在结构上将其重新融入全球穆斯林整体。对清教-伊斯兰主义取向对“世界”概念的解释范式进行简短反思,将各种范式置于一个比较框架中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
22 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信