Menahem Yeari, Tal Lavi, Atalia Rasouly-Balfer, Liron Shalev
{"title":"Meta-strategic Learning of Structure Strategies in Reading Comprehension of Expository Texts","authors":"Menahem Yeari, Tal Lavi, Atalia Rasouly-Balfer, Liron Shalev","doi":"10.1080/02702711.2023.2253219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Meta-strategic learning refers to a mediated construction of knowledge regarding when, why and how to apply a group of strategies for accomplishing cognitive tasks. This study examined the effect of meta-strategic learning of structure strategies on reading comprehension of expository texts by secondary school students under whole-class instruction conditions. The effect of a meta-strategic intervention program was compared to that of a strategic program, which focused on a direct (unmediated) instruction of how to apply each structure strategy separately, and to a control group. Moreover, we explored the role of students’ engagement in class discussions and tasks in meta-strategic learning. Three structure strategies using texts from three school domains were taught during 9 double lessons. Programs’ effectiveness was examined by near- and far-transference reading comprehension tasks, and a strategic knowledge questionnaire given before and after intervention. Findings indicated that both programs were similarly effective in enhancing students’ reading comprehension skills and strategic knowledge. The unique benefits of meta-strategic learning were apparent particularly for high-engaged students in far-transference tasks and for all students in overt application of strategic elements during task completion. More research is required to explore further benefits for meta-strategic learning in small groups and over the long-term.","PeriodicalId":46567,"journal":{"name":"Reading Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reading Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2023.2253219","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract Meta-strategic learning refers to a mediated construction of knowledge regarding when, why and how to apply a group of strategies for accomplishing cognitive tasks. This study examined the effect of meta-strategic learning of structure strategies on reading comprehension of expository texts by secondary school students under whole-class instruction conditions. The effect of a meta-strategic intervention program was compared to that of a strategic program, which focused on a direct (unmediated) instruction of how to apply each structure strategy separately, and to a control group. Moreover, we explored the role of students’ engagement in class discussions and tasks in meta-strategic learning. Three structure strategies using texts from three school domains were taught during 9 double lessons. Programs’ effectiveness was examined by near- and far-transference reading comprehension tasks, and a strategic knowledge questionnaire given before and after intervention. Findings indicated that both programs were similarly effective in enhancing students’ reading comprehension skills and strategic knowledge. The unique benefits of meta-strategic learning were apparent particularly for high-engaged students in far-transference tasks and for all students in overt application of strategic elements during task completion. More research is required to explore further benefits for meta-strategic learning in small groups and over the long-term.
期刊介绍:
Prepared exclusively by professionals, this refereed journal publishes original manuscripts in the fields of literacy, reading, and related psychology disciplines. Articles appear in the form of completed research; practitioner-based "experiential" methods or philosophical statements; teacher and counselor preparation services for guiding all levels of reading skill development, attitudes, and interests; programs or materials; and literary or humorous contributions.