“The teacher educator’s perceptions of professional agency – a paradox of enabling and hindering digital professional development in higher education”

IF 1.6 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Anna Roumbanis Viberg, K. Forslund Frykedal, Sylvana Sofkova Hashemi
{"title":"“The teacher educator’s perceptions of professional agency – a paradox of enabling and hindering digital professional development in higher education”","authors":"Anna Roumbanis Viberg, K. Forslund Frykedal, Sylvana Sofkova Hashemi","doi":"10.1080/20004508.2021.1984075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The aim of this study was to investigate professional agency in the context of higher education as manifested in Swedish teacher educators’ perceptions regarding their working life in a digital society and to seek to obtain insights on salient factors influencing professional agency and identity. Eighteen semi-structured interviews with teacher educators working at four different universities were analysed using directed content analysis. The theoretical perspective taken is a subject-centred socio-cultural approach to professional agency. This is an approach where the social context (the socio-cultural conditions) and individuals’ agency (professional subjects) are mutually constitutive but analytically separate. Agency is something that is exercised, and in this study, professional agency was explored in the work context, in teaching practice and in relation to the professional identity. The results of this study not only confirm the complexity of being a professional TE in the times of digitalisation but more importantly demonstrate a paradox in the TE’s perceived high agency that both enables and hinders self-development (the individual) as well as development of the working community, the organisation, and the university. The study implies that considerations and understanding of the TE’s autonomy and perceived agency are significant for professional and work development.","PeriodicalId":37203,"journal":{"name":"Education Inquiry","volume":"14 1","pages":"213 - 230"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education Inquiry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2021.1984075","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

ABSTRACT The aim of this study was to investigate professional agency in the context of higher education as manifested in Swedish teacher educators’ perceptions regarding their working life in a digital society and to seek to obtain insights on salient factors influencing professional agency and identity. Eighteen semi-structured interviews with teacher educators working at four different universities were analysed using directed content analysis. The theoretical perspective taken is a subject-centred socio-cultural approach to professional agency. This is an approach where the social context (the socio-cultural conditions) and individuals’ agency (professional subjects) are mutually constitutive but analytically separate. Agency is something that is exercised, and in this study, professional agency was explored in the work context, in teaching practice and in relation to the professional identity. The results of this study not only confirm the complexity of being a professional TE in the times of digitalisation but more importantly demonstrate a paradox in the TE’s perceived high agency that both enables and hinders self-development (the individual) as well as development of the working community, the organisation, and the university. The study implies that considerations and understanding of the TE’s autonomy and perceived agency are significant for professional and work development.
“教师教育工作者对专业代理的看法——促进和阻碍高等教育数字化专业发展的悖论”
摘要本研究的目的是调查高等教育背景下的职业代理,如瑞典教师教育工作者对其在数字社会中的工作生活的看法,并寻求对影响职业代理和身份的显著因素的见解。采用定向内容分析法对四所不同大学的教师教育工作者进行了18次半结构化访谈。所采取的理论观点是以主体为中心的专业代理的社会文化方法。这是一种社会背景(社会文化条件)和个人能动性(专业主体)相互构成,但在分析上是分开的方法。代理是一种被行使的东西,在本研究中,职业代理是在工作环境、教学实践以及与职业身份的关系中进行探索的。这项研究的结果不仅证实了在数字化时代成为一名专业TE的复杂性,而且更重要的是,证明了TE所感知的高度能动性中的一个悖论,这既促进又阻碍了自我发展(个人)以及工作社区、组织和大学的发展。该研究表明,对TE的自主权和感知代理权的考虑和理解对专业和工作发展具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Education Inquiry
Education Inquiry Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信