Favoritism in the Federal Workplace: Are Rules the Solution?

IF 4.2 3区 管理学 Q1 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
J. Pearce, Carrie Wang
{"title":"Favoritism in the Federal Workplace: Are Rules the Solution?","authors":"J. Pearce, Carrie Wang","doi":"10.1177/0734371x231155359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We develop and test a more comprehensive theory of the sources and effects of workplace favoritism by drawing on a large, agency-wide sample of U.S. Federal Aviation Administration employees. We report how members of various underrepresented groups differ in their perceptions of a variety of sources of favoritism. We find that their perceptions of friendship favoritism are an important source of perception of workplace favoritism for all employees. We show that perceptions of favoritism are negatively associated with employee trust in their organizations and coworkers, commitment to their organizations, willingness to speak up, and pay satisfaction, with friendship favoritism significantly dominating over most other sources. Further, we find that team leaders, supervisors, managers, and executives, with their greater knowledge of organizational processes, report less favoritism. This and previous research provide practical guidance on how greater transparency may reduce employee perceptions of favoritism in the federal workforce while avoiding discredited formalistic constraints.","PeriodicalId":47609,"journal":{"name":"Review of Public Personnel Administration","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Public Personnel Administration","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371x231155359","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We develop and test a more comprehensive theory of the sources and effects of workplace favoritism by drawing on a large, agency-wide sample of U.S. Federal Aviation Administration employees. We report how members of various underrepresented groups differ in their perceptions of a variety of sources of favoritism. We find that their perceptions of friendship favoritism are an important source of perception of workplace favoritism for all employees. We show that perceptions of favoritism are negatively associated with employee trust in their organizations and coworkers, commitment to their organizations, willingness to speak up, and pay satisfaction, with friendship favoritism significantly dominating over most other sources. Further, we find that team leaders, supervisors, managers, and executives, with their greater knowledge of organizational processes, report less favoritism. This and previous research provide practical guidance on how greater transparency may reduce employee perceptions of favoritism in the federal workforce while avoiding discredited formalistic constraints.
联邦工作场所的偏袒:规则是解决方案吗?
我们通过对美国联邦航空管理局员工的大量机构样本进行研究,开发并测试了一个关于工作场所偏袒的来源和影响的更全面的理论。我们报告了不同代表性不足群体的成员对各种偏袒来源的看法如何不同。我们发现,他们对友谊偏好的感知是所有员工对工作场所偏好感知的重要来源。我们发现,对偏袒的看法与员工对组织和同事的信任、对组织的承诺、敢于发声的意愿和薪酬满意度呈负相关,友谊偏袒显著高于大多数其他来源。此外,我们发现,团队领导者、主管、经理和高管对组织流程的了解越多,他们报告的偏袒就越少。这项研究和之前的研究为提高透明度如何减少员工对联邦劳动力中偏袒的看法,同时避免不可信的形式主义限制提供了实际指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: The Review of Public Personnel Administration publishes articles that reflect the varied approaches and methodologies used in the study and practice of public human resources management and labor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信