Owners' nonfinancial objectives and the diversification and internationalization of business groups

IF 4.6 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Alvaro Cuervo-Cazurra, Asli M. Colpan
{"title":"Owners' nonfinancial objectives and the diversification and internationalization of business groups","authors":"Alvaro Cuervo-Cazurra,&nbsp;Asli M. Colpan","doi":"10.1111/corg.12507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Research Question/Issue</h3>\n \n <p>Studies on business groups, a collection of legally separate firms operating in unrelated industries under common control, tend to compare the behavior of firms affiliated with business groups and firms that are independent companies. Unfortunately, this ignores the diversity among business groups based on their controlling owner. Hence, in this conceptual article, we study how the types of controlling owners impact the diversification and internationalization of business groups.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Research Findings/Insights</h3>\n \n <p>Building on agency theory, we separate business groups into five types based on their ultimate controlling owners (state, labor, family, mutual, and bank) and identify their nonfinancial objectives. We argue that their nonfinancial objectives result in diverging levels of diversification and internationalization of business groups across owner types. Specifically, we propose that state-owned and bank-owned business groups have a relatively high level of diversification, labor-owned and mutual-owned business groups have a relatively moderate level, and family-owned business groups have a relatively low level. We also argue that state-owned and labor-owned business groups have a relatively low level of internationalization, family-owned business groups have a relatively moderate level, and mutual-owned and bank-owned business groups have a relatively high level. We add depth to these ideas by proposing that pro-market reforms alter owners' ability to achieve their nonfinancial objectives, leading to diverging changes in business groups' diversification and internationalization across owner types. Specifically, we propose that following pro-market reforms, state-owned and bank-owned business groups experience a large decrease in their level of diversification, labor-owned and mutual-owned business groups see a moderate decrease, and family-owned business groups have a small decrease. We also argue that pro-market reforms lead state-owned and labor-owned business groups to have a small increase in their level of internationalization, family-owned a moderate increase, and mutual-owned and bank-owned to experience a large increase.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Theoretical/Academic Implications</h3>\n \n <p>To the business groups literature, we highlight the importance of controlling owners and their nonfinancial objectives as the drivers of business group diversification and internationalization, complementing the usual focus on market imperfections. To agency theory, we highlight the diversity of owners' nonfinancial objectives and explain how these affect strategy, complementing the traditional focus on differences in objectives between owners and professional managers driving strategy.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Practitioner/Policy Implications</h3>\n \n <p>Managers can defend decisions based on the often-unstated nonfinancial objectives of the controlling owners, countering external investors' criticisms of managers misbehaving by not aiming to maximize profits.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48209,"journal":{"name":"Corporate Governance-An International Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corporate Governance-An International Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/corg.12507","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Research Question/Issue

Studies on business groups, a collection of legally separate firms operating in unrelated industries under common control, tend to compare the behavior of firms affiliated with business groups and firms that are independent companies. Unfortunately, this ignores the diversity among business groups based on their controlling owner. Hence, in this conceptual article, we study how the types of controlling owners impact the diversification and internationalization of business groups.

Research Findings/Insights

Building on agency theory, we separate business groups into five types based on their ultimate controlling owners (state, labor, family, mutual, and bank) and identify their nonfinancial objectives. We argue that their nonfinancial objectives result in diverging levels of diversification and internationalization of business groups across owner types. Specifically, we propose that state-owned and bank-owned business groups have a relatively high level of diversification, labor-owned and mutual-owned business groups have a relatively moderate level, and family-owned business groups have a relatively low level. We also argue that state-owned and labor-owned business groups have a relatively low level of internationalization, family-owned business groups have a relatively moderate level, and mutual-owned and bank-owned business groups have a relatively high level. We add depth to these ideas by proposing that pro-market reforms alter owners' ability to achieve their nonfinancial objectives, leading to diverging changes in business groups' diversification and internationalization across owner types. Specifically, we propose that following pro-market reforms, state-owned and bank-owned business groups experience a large decrease in their level of diversification, labor-owned and mutual-owned business groups see a moderate decrease, and family-owned business groups have a small decrease. We also argue that pro-market reforms lead state-owned and labor-owned business groups to have a small increase in their level of internationalization, family-owned a moderate increase, and mutual-owned and bank-owned to experience a large increase.

Theoretical/Academic Implications

To the business groups literature, we highlight the importance of controlling owners and their nonfinancial objectives as the drivers of business group diversification and internationalization, complementing the usual focus on market imperfections. To agency theory, we highlight the diversity of owners' nonfinancial objectives and explain how these affect strategy, complementing the traditional focus on differences in objectives between owners and professional managers driving strategy.

Practitioner/Policy Implications

Managers can defend decisions based on the often-unstated nonfinancial objectives of the controlling owners, countering external investors' criticisms of managers misbehaving by not aiming to maximize profits.

业主的非财务目标与企业集团的多元化和国际化
企业集团是指在共同控制下,在不相关的行业中经营的合法独立企业的集合,对企业集团的研究倾向于比较隶属于企业集团的企业和独立企业的行为。不幸的是,这忽略了基于控股所有者的商业集团之间的多样性。因此,在这篇概念性的文章中,我们研究了控股所有者类型如何影响企业集团的多元化和国际化。在代理理论的基础上,我们根据企业集团的最终控股所有者(国家、劳工、家庭、互助和银行)将其分为五类,并确定了它们的非财务目标。我们认为,它们的非财务目标导致了不同所有者类型的企业集团多元化和国际化水平的差异。具体而言,我们提出国有企业集团和银行企业集团多元化程度较高,劳动企业集团和互助企业集团多元化程度相对适中,家族企业集团多元化程度相对较低。我们还认为,国有企业集团和劳动企业集团的国际化水平相对较低,家族企业集团的国际化水平相对中等,互助企业集团和银行企业集团的国际化水平相对较高。我们通过提出亲市场改革改变了所有者实现其非财务目标的能力,从而导致商业集团在不同所有者类型的多元化和国际化方面的不同变化,从而进一步深化了这些观点。具体而言,我们提出,在市场化改革后,国有和银行企业集团的多元化水平大幅下降,劳动和互助企业集团的多元化水平适度下降,家族企业集团的多元化水平小幅下降。我们还认为,市场化改革导致国有企业集团和劳动企业集团的国际化水平小幅提高,家族企业集团的国际化水平适度提高,共同企业集团和银行企业集团的国际化水平大幅提高。对于商业集团文献,我们强调了控股所有者及其非财务目标作为商业集团多元化和国际化驱动因素的重要性,补充了通常对市场不完善的关注。对于代理理论,我们强调了所有者非财务目标的多样性,并解释了这些目标如何影响战略,补充了传统的关注所有者和职业经理人驱动战略之间目标差异的观点。从业者/政策影响管理者可以根据通常未说明的控股所有者的非财务目标为决策辩护,反击外部投资者对管理者行为不当的批评,因为他们没有以利润最大化为目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
11.30%
发文量
79
期刊介绍: The mission of Corporate Governance: An International Review is to publish cutting-edge international business research on the phenomena of comparative corporate governance throughout the global economy. Our ultimate goal is a rigorous and relevant global theory of corporate governance. We define corporate governance broadly as the exercise of power over corporate entities so as to increase the value provided to the organization"s various stakeholders, as well as making those stakeholders accountable for acting responsibly with regard to the protection, generation, and distribution of wealth invested in the firm. Because of this broad conceptualization, a wide variety of academic disciplines can contribute to our understanding.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信