Swedish teachers’ and school leaders’ rebellion groups on Facebook- collective formations and administrators as gatekeepers

IF 1.6 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Annica Löfdahl Hultman, A. Bergh, Maria Lennartsdotter, Håkan Löfgren
{"title":"Swedish teachers’ and school leaders’ rebellion groups on Facebook- collective formations and administrators as gatekeepers","authors":"Annica Löfdahl Hultman, A. Bergh, Maria Lennartsdotter, Håkan Löfgren","doi":"10.1080/20004508.2021.2022583","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article explores Swedish teachers’ and school leaders’ Facebook rebellion groups as a medium where professional needs and actions can be formulated. Data consist of interviews with administrators representing the rebellion groups. Based on a theoretical perspective of teacher agency we searched for experiences and visions related to contextual aspects expressed in the groups. The results indicate a common experience of lacking resources among the groups. Through a well-balanced agency, they search for support among politicians in their striving to improve working conditions. However, the groups might develop different conditions for participating due to the formation of group-specific conversational climate about what is desirable and possible to post and discuss. Discussions on work-related issues might certainly be affected and the rebellion groups might contribute to preserve the specificity of each level in the school system. A split in the teachers’ rebellion group indicates virtual relationships between professionals are easy to give up in favour of new formations, making the virtual groups vulnerable. The results raise the question about changing cultural aspects and what it means to be a professional teacher/school leader. Will teacher agency in the future be dependent on participation in such social media groups?","PeriodicalId":37203,"journal":{"name":"Education Inquiry","volume":"14 1","pages":"352 - 366"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education Inquiry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2021.2022583","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article explores Swedish teachers’ and school leaders’ Facebook rebellion groups as a medium where professional needs and actions can be formulated. Data consist of interviews with administrators representing the rebellion groups. Based on a theoretical perspective of teacher agency we searched for experiences and visions related to contextual aspects expressed in the groups. The results indicate a common experience of lacking resources among the groups. Through a well-balanced agency, they search for support among politicians in their striving to improve working conditions. However, the groups might develop different conditions for participating due to the formation of group-specific conversational climate about what is desirable and possible to post and discuss. Discussions on work-related issues might certainly be affected and the rebellion groups might contribute to preserve the specificity of each level in the school system. A split in the teachers’ rebellion group indicates virtual relationships between professionals are easy to give up in favour of new formations, making the virtual groups vulnerable. The results raise the question about changing cultural aspects and what it means to be a professional teacher/school leader. Will teacher agency in the future be dependent on participation in such social media groups?
脸书上的瑞典教师和学校领导叛乱团体-集体组织和管理员充当看门人
本文探讨了瑞典教师和学校领导的Facebook反叛团体作为制定专业需求和行动的媒介。数据包括对代表反叛组织的管理人员的采访。基于教师代理的理论视角,我们寻找与群体中表达的情境方面相关的经验和愿景。结果表明,在这些群体中,缺乏资源是一个共同的经历。通过一个平衡良好的机构,他们寻求政界人士的支持,努力改善工作条件。然而,由于群体特定的对话氛围的形成,关于什么是可取的和可能的发布和讨论,这些群体可能会发展出不同的参与条件。关于工作相关问题的讨论肯定会受到影响,反叛团体可能有助于保持学校系统中每个级别的特殊性。教师反叛团体的分裂表明,专业人士之间的虚拟关系很容易放弃,转而支持新的形式,使虚拟团体变得脆弱。研究结果提出了一个关于文化方面变化的问题,以及成为一名专业教师/学校领导意味着什么。未来的教师代理会依赖于这些社交媒体群的参与吗?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Education Inquiry
Education Inquiry Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信