Retaining the learning professional: A survival study on workplace learning in professional service firms

IF 4 3区 管理学 Q1 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR
Therese Grohnert, Roger H. G. Meuwissen, Wim H. Gijselaers
{"title":"Retaining the learning professional: A survival study on workplace learning in professional service firms","authors":"Therese Grohnert,&nbsp;Roger H. G. Meuwissen,&nbsp;Wim H. Gijselaers","doi":"10.1002/hrdq.21436","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Lowering professional turnover is of paramount importance for professional service firms, as with each professional, crucial proprietary knowledge leaves the firm. Based on the need to retain this crucial knowledge in the firm, this study explores whether factors that drive learning at work also mitigate professionals' turnover behavior. Building on insights from both workplace learning and turnover research, this study follows 96 professional auditors across a period of 5 years to determine how drivers for workplace learning at the organizational, the social interaction, and the individual level relate to turnover behavior. Through survival analysis, we find that those auditors who experience a supportive learning climate at the organizational level were less likely to leave their firm and profession, while those who score high on individual-level reflection were more likely to leave their firm and profession. We also found that professionals scoring high on reflection leave more quickly when they perceive to work in an unsupportive learning climate—when they experience low synergy across workplace learning levels. Especially observable behaviors, such as providing help and feedback, discussing errors, and building trust, made a significant difference. This study adds to extant research in three principal ways: exploring actual turnover behavior, approaching turnover behavior through a lens of workplace learning, and analyzing interactions between individual-, social- and organizational-level learning. The findings of this study lead to specific insights for HRD practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":47803,"journal":{"name":"Human Resource Development Quarterly","volume":"32 4","pages":"577-595"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/hrdq.21436","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Resource Development Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hrdq.21436","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Lowering professional turnover is of paramount importance for professional service firms, as with each professional, crucial proprietary knowledge leaves the firm. Based on the need to retain this crucial knowledge in the firm, this study explores whether factors that drive learning at work also mitigate professionals' turnover behavior. Building on insights from both workplace learning and turnover research, this study follows 96 professional auditors across a period of 5 years to determine how drivers for workplace learning at the organizational, the social interaction, and the individual level relate to turnover behavior. Through survival analysis, we find that those auditors who experience a supportive learning climate at the organizational level were less likely to leave their firm and profession, while those who score high on individual-level reflection were more likely to leave their firm and profession. We also found that professionals scoring high on reflection leave more quickly when they perceive to work in an unsupportive learning climate—when they experience low synergy across workplace learning levels. Especially observable behaviors, such as providing help and feedback, discussing errors, and building trust, made a significant difference. This study adds to extant research in three principal ways: exploring actual turnover behavior, approaching turnover behavior through a lens of workplace learning, and analyzing interactions between individual-, social- and organizational-level learning. The findings of this study lead to specific insights for HRD practice.

Abstract Image

保留学习专业人员:专业服务公司工作场所学习的生存研究
对于专业服务公司来说,降低专业人员流动率是至关重要的,因为对于每个专业人员来说,关键的专有知识都会离开公司。基于在公司中保留这些关键知识的需求,本研究探讨了推动工作中学习的因素是否也会减轻专业人员的离职行为。基于工作场所学习和人员流失研究的见解,本研究在5年的时间里跟踪调查了96名专业审计师,以确定组织、社会互动和个人层面的工作场所学习驱动因素与人员流失行为的关系。通过生存分析,我们发现那些在组织层面经历支持性学习氛围的审计师不太可能离开他们的公司和职业,而那些在个人层面反思得分高的审计师更有可能离开他们的公司和职业。我们还发现,在反思方面得分高的专业人士,当他们感觉到在一个不受支持的学习环境中工作时,当他们在工作场所的学习水平上感受到低协同作用时,他们会更快地离开。尤其是可观察的行为,如提供帮助和反馈、讨论错误和建立信任,产生了显著的影响。本研究在三个主要方面对现有研究进行了补充:探索实际的离职行为,通过工作场所学习的视角来研究离职行为,以及分析个人、社会和组织层面学习之间的相互作用。本研究的发现为人力资源开发实践提供了具体的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
6.10%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: Human Resource Development Quarterly (HRDQ) is the first scholarly journal focused directly on the evolving field of human resource development (HRD). It provides a central focus for research on human resource development issues as well as the means for disseminating such research. HRDQ recognizes the interdisciplinary nature of the HRD field and brings together relevant research from the related fields, such as economics, education, management, sociology, and psychology. It provides an important link in the application of theory and research to HRD practice. HRDQ publishes scholarly work that addresses the theoretical foundations of HRD, HRD research, and evaluation of HRD interventions and contexts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信