Blackwomen* Academics as Contemporary Anti-Slavery Rebels: Breachers of the Intersecting Contract in Tenure Denial Lawsuits

IF 1.3 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
LaWanda W. M. Ward, Chayla Haynes, Raya Petty, Tierra Walters Mackie
{"title":"Blackwomen* Academics as Contemporary Anti-Slavery Rebels: Breachers of the Intersecting Contract in Tenure Denial Lawsuits","authors":"LaWanda W. M. Ward, Chayla Haynes, Raya Petty, Tierra Walters Mackie","doi":"10.1080/00131946.2023.2194537","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract White men who enslaved people of African descent and wrote the U.S. Constitution never imagined Blackwomen as persons who would become educated citizens. Acknowledgments and legal interpretations to affirm Blackwomen’s personhood are absent from the romanticized document. We argue that in academia the intersecting contract is imposed on Blackwomen’s bodies when their worth, qualifications, and potential are overly scrutinized, and they experience epistemic and physical violence within PWIs and in society writ large. The intersecting contract, through plantation politics, further helps to explain why Blackwomen academics who are seeking tenure are expected to overextend themselves by doing extra work without fair compensation. We use intersectionality methodology in our application of Angela Davis’ framework, Blackwomen as contemporary anti-slavery rebels, to illuminate how three Blackwomen academics breach the intersecting contract that undergirds discriminatory practices enacted by institutional actors to deprive them of tenure and promotion and trample on their dignity. We conclude by inviting Blackwomen academics to embody a maroon logic for rest, healing, and protection as PWIs cannot be coconspirators in our liberation.","PeriodicalId":46285,"journal":{"name":"Educational Studies-AESA","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Studies-AESA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00131946.2023.2194537","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract White men who enslaved people of African descent and wrote the U.S. Constitution never imagined Blackwomen as persons who would become educated citizens. Acknowledgments and legal interpretations to affirm Blackwomen’s personhood are absent from the romanticized document. We argue that in academia the intersecting contract is imposed on Blackwomen’s bodies when their worth, qualifications, and potential are overly scrutinized, and they experience epistemic and physical violence within PWIs and in society writ large. The intersecting contract, through plantation politics, further helps to explain why Blackwomen academics who are seeking tenure are expected to overextend themselves by doing extra work without fair compensation. We use intersectionality methodology in our application of Angela Davis’ framework, Blackwomen as contemporary anti-slavery rebels, to illuminate how three Blackwomen academics breach the intersecting contract that undergirds discriminatory practices enacted by institutional actors to deprive them of tenure and promotion and trample on their dignity. We conclude by inviting Blackwomen academics to embody a maroon logic for rest, healing, and protection as PWIs cannot be coconspirators in our liberation.
作为当代反奴隶制反叛者的黑人女性学术界:否认终身监禁诉讼中的交叉合同违约者
奴役非洲人后裔和撰写美国宪法的白人从来没有想到黑人妇女会成为受过教育的公民。在这份浪漫化的文件中,没有对黑人妇女人格的承认和法律解释。我们认为,在学术界,当黑人女性的价值、资格和潜力被过度审视时,这种交叉契约就被强加于她们的身体上,她们在pwi和社会中经历了认知和身体上的暴力。这种相互交织的契约,通过种植园政治,进一步帮助解释了为什么寻求终身教职的黑人女性学者会在没有公平报酬的情况下做额外的工作,从而过度扩张自己。我们在安吉拉·戴维斯的框架——黑人女性作为当代反奴隶制的反叛者——的应用中使用了交叉性方法,以阐明三位黑人女性学者是如何违反交叉契约的,这种交叉契约是由制度参与者制定的,以剥夺她们的终身职位和晋升为基础的歧视性做法,并践踏她们的尊严。最后,我们邀请黑人女性学者来体现一种关于休息、治疗和保护的栗色逻辑,因为黑人女性不能成为我们解放的同谋。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Educational Studies-AESA
Educational Studies-AESA EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
33
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信