{"title":"Kepimpinan Transformasional Pengetua dan Efikasi Kendiri Guru: Satu Kajian Empirikal di Sekolah Menengah Persendirian Cina di Pulau Pinang, Malaysia","authors":"Bee Chen Wong, Lei Mee Thien","doi":"10.21315/apjee2020/35.2.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was to identify the relationships between transformational leadership dimensions and the dimensions of teacher self-efficacy in Malaysian Chinese Independent High Schools (CIHS) in Malaysia. This study employed a cross-sectional quantitative survey research design. Data were collected from five CIHS in Pulau Pinang. A total of 384 respondents from CIHS were participated in this study. This study used partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) approaches for data analysis. Findings showed that the charisma dimension has significant relationship with each dimensions of teacher self-efficacy: instructional strategies (β = 0.244, p < 0.05), classroom management (β = 0.264, p < 0.05), and student engagement (β = 0.192, p < 0.05). However, dimension of motivation inspiration has no significant relationships with each dimension of teacher self-efficacy: instructional strategies (β = −0.159, p = 0.061), classroom management (β = −0.185, p = 0.066), and student engagement (β = −0.195, p = 0.068). The dimension of individualised consideration has no significant positive relationship with instructional strategic (β = 0.109, p = 0.130). However, individualised consideration has significant positive relationship with classroom management (β = 0.309, p = 0.001) and student engagement (β = 0.336, p < 0.001). The dimension of intellectual motivation has significant positive relationship with instructional strategic (β = 0.225, p = 0.016). In contrast, no significant relationships were found between intellectual motivation and classroom management (β = 0.100, p = 0.162) as well as intellectual motivation and student engagement (β = 0.336, p < 0.001). Transformational leadership contributed 16.1% variance explained on instructional strategies, 15.8% variance explained on classroom management, and 18.1% variance explained on student engagement dimension. Implications and direction for future studies were discussed.","PeriodicalId":36930,"journal":{"name":"Asia Pacific Journal of Educators and Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Pacific Journal of Educators and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21315/apjee2020/35.2.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to identify the relationships between transformational leadership dimensions and the dimensions of teacher self-efficacy in Malaysian Chinese Independent High Schools (CIHS) in Malaysia. This study employed a cross-sectional quantitative survey research design. Data were collected from five CIHS in Pulau Pinang. A total of 384 respondents from CIHS were participated in this study. This study used partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) approaches for data analysis. Findings showed that the charisma dimension has significant relationship with each dimensions of teacher self-efficacy: instructional strategies (β = 0.244, p < 0.05), classroom management (β = 0.264, p < 0.05), and student engagement (β = 0.192, p < 0.05). However, dimension of motivation inspiration has no significant relationships with each dimension of teacher self-efficacy: instructional strategies (β = −0.159, p = 0.061), classroom management (β = −0.185, p = 0.066), and student engagement (β = −0.195, p = 0.068). The dimension of individualised consideration has no significant positive relationship with instructional strategic (β = 0.109, p = 0.130). However, individualised consideration has significant positive relationship with classroom management (β = 0.309, p = 0.001) and student engagement (β = 0.336, p < 0.001). The dimension of intellectual motivation has significant positive relationship with instructional strategic (β = 0.225, p = 0.016). In contrast, no significant relationships were found between intellectual motivation and classroom management (β = 0.100, p = 0.162) as well as intellectual motivation and student engagement (β = 0.336, p < 0.001). Transformational leadership contributed 16.1% variance explained on instructional strategies, 15.8% variance explained on classroom management, and 18.1% variance explained on student engagement dimension. Implications and direction for future studies were discussed.