Beyond HC: More sensitive tests for rare/weak alternatives

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Thomas Porter, M. Stewart
{"title":"Beyond HC: More sensitive tests for rare/weak alternatives","authors":"Thomas Porter, M. Stewart","doi":"10.1214/19-aos1885","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Higher criticism (HC) is a popular method for large-scale inference problems based on identifying unusually high proportions of small pvalues. It has been shown to enjoy a lower-order optimality property in a simple normal location mixture model which is shared by the ‘tailor-made’ parametric generalised likelihood ratio test (GLRT) for the same model, however HC has also been shown to perform well outside this ‘narrow’ model. We develop a higher-order framework for analysing the power of these and similar procedures, which reveals the perhaps unsurprising fact that the GLRT enjoys an edge in power over HC for the normal location mixture model. We also identify a similar parametric mixture model to which HC is similarly ‘tailor-made’ and show that the situation is (at least partly) reversed there. We also show that in the normal location mixture model a procedure based on the empirical moment-generating function enjoys the same local power properties as the GLRT and may be recommended as an easy to implement (and interpret), complementary procedure to HC. Some other practical advice regarding the implementation of these procedures is provided. Finally we provide some simulation results to help interpret our theoretical findings.","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1214/19-aos1885","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Higher criticism (HC) is a popular method for large-scale inference problems based on identifying unusually high proportions of small pvalues. It has been shown to enjoy a lower-order optimality property in a simple normal location mixture model which is shared by the ‘tailor-made’ parametric generalised likelihood ratio test (GLRT) for the same model, however HC has also been shown to perform well outside this ‘narrow’ model. We develop a higher-order framework for analysing the power of these and similar procedures, which reveals the perhaps unsurprising fact that the GLRT enjoys an edge in power over HC for the normal location mixture model. We also identify a similar parametric mixture model to which HC is similarly ‘tailor-made’ and show that the situation is (at least partly) reversed there. We also show that in the normal location mixture model a procedure based on the empirical moment-generating function enjoys the same local power properties as the GLRT and may be recommended as an easy to implement (and interpret), complementary procedure to HC. Some other practical advice regarding the implementation of these procedures is provided. Finally we provide some simulation results to help interpret our theoretical findings.
超越HC:罕见/弱替代品的更敏感测试
高等批评(HC)是一种基于识别异常高比例的小p值的大规模推理问题的流行方法。在一个简单的正态位置混合模型中,它被证明具有较低阶的最优性性质,这是同一模型的“量身定制”参数广义似然比检验(GLRT)所共享的,然而HC也被证明在这个“窄”模型之外表现良好。我们开发了一个高阶框架来分析这些和类似程序的功率,这揭示了一个可能并不令人惊讶的事实,即对于正常位置混合模型,GLRT在功率上优于HC。我们还确定了一个类似的参数混合物模型,HC与该模型类似地“量身定制”,并表明情况(至少部分)在那里发生了逆转。我们还表明,在正常位置混合模型中,基于经验矩生成函数的程序与GLRT具有相同的局部功率特性,并且可以被推荐为易于实现(和解释)的HC补充程序。还提供了关于执行这些程序的一些其他实际建议。最后,我们提供了一些模拟结果来帮助解释我们的理论发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信