The Diagnosis of Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis and the Role of Lung Biopsy

Q4 Medicine
E. Seixas, P. Serra, R. Aguiar, Margarida Ferreira, P. Ferreira
{"title":"The Diagnosis of Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis and the Role of Lung Biopsy","authors":"E. Seixas, P. Serra, R. Aguiar, Margarida Ferreira, P. Ferreira","doi":"10.1097/CPM.0000000000000385","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) refers to a collective noun of diffuse lung diseases encompassing some degree of bronchiolar and interstitial granulomatous inflammation that results from persistent inhalation exposure and consequent immune sensitization to a large potential diversity of (predominantly) organic antigens in predisposed individuals. In suspected cases of HP, forceps transbronchial lung biopsy (TBLB) has been traditionally performed on a case-by-case basis along with bronchoalveolar lavage. This option has been subject to some debate and its use is more restrained in the presence of a chronic fibrotic form of HP—where surgical lung biopsy is classically recommended in the face of the need for a more reliable differentiation from fibrotic idiopathic interstitial pneumonias. We intended to assess the diagnostic contribution of conventional TBLB in the combined multidisciplinary diagnosis of an HP patient cohort. A retrospective evaluation of all the diagnostic elements and level of confidence from all HP cases followed in an interstitial lung disease ILD outpatient clinic of a district hospital center (Centro Hospitalar do Baixo Vouga), from June 2015 to August 2019, and simultaneously evaluated in a multidisciplinary team discussion of the same hospital, comprising an interstitial lung disease dedicated lung physician, a chest radiologist, 2 rheumatologists, and a pathologist. We identified 78 patients (mean age: 70.5 y, interquartile range: 58.5 to 78.0) with a slight female predominance. Most of the patients (61.5%) had chronic/fibrotic HP. The most frequently identified inducing antigens were avian antigens in 59.0% of cases, followed by molds in 20.5%. Of the 72 patients who underwent bronchofibroscopy, 36.1% (n=26) conventional TBLB performed, predominantly in the segments of the right lower lobe with an average number of 3.9 biopsies (SD±1.4) accomplished per patient. In 50.0% of the cases submitted to TBLB, the biopsies showed representative material with histologic features (definite or supportive) which had some degree of contribution for the diagnostic discussion. Among the patients where TBLBs were not performed or whose results were found to be devoid of significant findings, 73.1% were still diagnosed as HP without the need for surgical video-assisted thoracoscopic lung biopsy/transbronchial lung cryobiopsy (VATS/TBLCB) on the grounds of other diagnostic elements; 15.4% of patients were diagnosed with HP after a VATS/TBLCB procedure. Lastly, around 11.5% of patients were considered to have an unacceptable risk for VATS/TBLCB but, on the basis of clinical, radiologic, and immunologic elements received a multidisciplinary provisional diagnosis still with a reasonable level of confidence. Regarding complications with TBLB, there were 2 cases of moderate bleeding (7.6%) and 1 pneumothorax (3.8%) that did not require drainage. Notwithstanding its limitations, TBLB can still have a role in the diagnostic workup of HP, namely in acute/inflammatory HP, adding definite or supportive histologic information for multidisciplinary discussion in up to 50% of cases. TBLB can augment diagnostic yield at the expense of only a minimal increase of risk, as it is a universally available technique that can be performed along with bronchoalveolar lavage. This has important implications, particularly in centers devoid of TBLCB, as a surgical biopsy can be avoided in approximately half of patients who are eventually diagnosed with HP.","PeriodicalId":10393,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pulmonary Medicine","volume":"27 1","pages":"193 - 197"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Pulmonary Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CPM.0000000000000385","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) refers to a collective noun of diffuse lung diseases encompassing some degree of bronchiolar and interstitial granulomatous inflammation that results from persistent inhalation exposure and consequent immune sensitization to a large potential diversity of (predominantly) organic antigens in predisposed individuals. In suspected cases of HP, forceps transbronchial lung biopsy (TBLB) has been traditionally performed on a case-by-case basis along with bronchoalveolar lavage. This option has been subject to some debate and its use is more restrained in the presence of a chronic fibrotic form of HP—where surgical lung biopsy is classically recommended in the face of the need for a more reliable differentiation from fibrotic idiopathic interstitial pneumonias. We intended to assess the diagnostic contribution of conventional TBLB in the combined multidisciplinary diagnosis of an HP patient cohort. A retrospective evaluation of all the diagnostic elements and level of confidence from all HP cases followed in an interstitial lung disease ILD outpatient clinic of a district hospital center (Centro Hospitalar do Baixo Vouga), from June 2015 to August 2019, and simultaneously evaluated in a multidisciplinary team discussion of the same hospital, comprising an interstitial lung disease dedicated lung physician, a chest radiologist, 2 rheumatologists, and a pathologist. We identified 78 patients (mean age: 70.5 y, interquartile range: 58.5 to 78.0) with a slight female predominance. Most of the patients (61.5%) had chronic/fibrotic HP. The most frequently identified inducing antigens were avian antigens in 59.0% of cases, followed by molds in 20.5%. Of the 72 patients who underwent bronchofibroscopy, 36.1% (n=26) conventional TBLB performed, predominantly in the segments of the right lower lobe with an average number of 3.9 biopsies (SD±1.4) accomplished per patient. In 50.0% of the cases submitted to TBLB, the biopsies showed representative material with histologic features (definite or supportive) which had some degree of contribution for the diagnostic discussion. Among the patients where TBLBs were not performed or whose results were found to be devoid of significant findings, 73.1% were still diagnosed as HP without the need for surgical video-assisted thoracoscopic lung biopsy/transbronchial lung cryobiopsy (VATS/TBLCB) on the grounds of other diagnostic elements; 15.4% of patients were diagnosed with HP after a VATS/TBLCB procedure. Lastly, around 11.5% of patients were considered to have an unacceptable risk for VATS/TBLCB but, on the basis of clinical, radiologic, and immunologic elements received a multidisciplinary provisional diagnosis still with a reasonable level of confidence. Regarding complications with TBLB, there were 2 cases of moderate bleeding (7.6%) and 1 pneumothorax (3.8%) that did not require drainage. Notwithstanding its limitations, TBLB can still have a role in the diagnostic workup of HP, namely in acute/inflammatory HP, adding definite or supportive histologic information for multidisciplinary discussion in up to 50% of cases. TBLB can augment diagnostic yield at the expense of only a minimal increase of risk, as it is a universally available technique that can be performed along with bronchoalveolar lavage. This has important implications, particularly in centers devoid of TBLCB, as a surgical biopsy can be avoided in approximately half of patients who are eventually diagnosed with HP.
超敏性肺炎的诊断及肺活检的作用
超敏性肺炎(HP)是指弥漫性肺部疾病的统称,包括一定程度的细支气管和间质性肉芽肿性炎症,这些炎症是由持续吸入暴露和易感个体对大量潜在多样性(主要是)有机抗原的免疫增敏引起的。在疑似HP病例中,传统上是在个案基础上进行钳式经支气管肺活检(TBLB)和支气管肺泡灌洗。这一选择一直存在一些争议,在存在慢性纤维化形式的HP的情况下,它的使用更受限制——在需要更可靠地与纤维化特发性间质性肺炎进行鉴别时,通常建议进行外科肺活检。我们打算评估传统TBLB在HP患者队列的多学科联合诊断中的诊断作用。2015年6月至2019年8月,在地区医院中心(Centro Hospitalar do Baixo Vouga)的间质性肺病ILD门诊对所有HP病例的所有诊断要素和置信水平进行了回顾性评估,并在同一医院的多学科团队讨论中同时进行了评估,包括一名间质性肺病专职肺部医生、一名胸部放射科医生、两名风湿病学家和一名病理学家。我们确定了78名患者(平均年龄:70.5岁) y、 四分位间距:58.5至78.0),女性略占优势。大多数患者(61.5%)患有慢性/纤维化HP。最常见的诱导抗原是59.0%的病例中的禽抗原,其次是20.5%的霉菌。在接受支气管纤维镜检查的72名患者中,36.1%(n=26)的患者进行了常规TBLB,主要在右下叶节段,平均每位患者完成3.9次活组织检查(SD±1.4)。在提交给TBLB的50.0%的病例中,活检显示具有组织学特征(明确或支持性)的代表性材料,这对诊断讨论有一定程度的贡献。在未进行TBLB或其结果没有显著发现的患者中,73.1%的患者仍被诊断为HP,而无需基于其他诊断因素进行手术电视胸腔镜肺活检/经支气管肺冷冻活检(VATS/TBLCB);15.4%的患者在VATS/TBLCB手术后被诊断为HP。最后,约11.5%的患者被认为有不可接受的VATS/TBLCB风险,但根据临床、放射学和免疫学因素,接受了多学科的临时诊断,仍具有合理的置信水平。关于TBLB的并发症,有2例中度出血(7.6%)和1例不需要引流的肺气肿(3.8%)。尽管有局限性,TBLB仍然可以在HP的诊断检查中发挥作用,即在急性/炎症性HP中,为高达50%的病例的多学科讨论增加明确或支持性的组织学信息。TBLB可以以最小的风险增加为代价提高诊断效率,因为它是一种普遍可用的技术,可以与支气管肺泡灌洗一起进行。这具有重要意义,特别是在没有TBLCB的中心,因为大约一半最终被诊断为HP的患者可以避免手术活检。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Pulmonary Medicine
Clinical Pulmonary Medicine Medicine-Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Clinical Pulmonary Medicine provides a forum for the discussion of important new knowledge in the field of pulmonary medicine that is of interest and relevance to the practitioner. This goal is achieved through mini-reviews on focused sub-specialty topics in areas covered within the journal. These areas include: Obstructive Airways Disease; Respiratory Infections; Interstitial, Inflammatory, and Occupational Diseases; Clinical Practice Management; Critical Care/Respiratory Care; Colleagues in Respiratory Medicine; and Topics in Respiratory Medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信