Unequal Reach: Cyclical and Amplifying Ties Among Agricultural and Oilfield Workers in Texas

IF 4.4 2区 社会学 Q1 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR
K. Griesbach
{"title":"Unequal Reach: Cyclical and Amplifying Ties Among Agricultural and Oilfield Workers in Texas","authors":"K. Griesbach","doi":"10.1177/07308884211034208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"What kinds of ties do agricultural and oil and gas workers form in the field, and how do they use them later on? Why do they use them differently? Scholarship highlights how weak ties can link people to valuable information, while strong ties can be critical for day-to-day survival. Yet many mechanisms affect how workers form and use social networks over time and space. Drawing on 60 interviews and observations with agricultural and oilfield workers in Texas, I examine how both groups form strong ties of fictive kinship when living together in the field far from home—pooling resources, sharing reproductive labor, and using the discourse of family to describe these relationships. Then I examine how they use these ties very differently later in practice. Oilfield workers often use their fictive kin ties to move up and around the industry across space, time, and companies: amplifying ties. In contrast, agricultural workers renew the same strong ties for survival from season to season, maintaining cyclical ties. The comparison highlights how industry mobility ladders, tempos, and geographies affect how workers can use their networks in practice. While both agricultural and oilfield workers become fictive kin in situations of intense proximity, structural differences give their networks unequal reach.","PeriodicalId":47716,"journal":{"name":"Work and Occupations","volume":"49 1","pages":"3 - 44"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Work and Occupations","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/07308884211034208","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

What kinds of ties do agricultural and oil and gas workers form in the field, and how do they use them later on? Why do they use them differently? Scholarship highlights how weak ties can link people to valuable information, while strong ties can be critical for day-to-day survival. Yet many mechanisms affect how workers form and use social networks over time and space. Drawing on 60 interviews and observations with agricultural and oilfield workers in Texas, I examine how both groups form strong ties of fictive kinship when living together in the field far from home—pooling resources, sharing reproductive labor, and using the discourse of family to describe these relationships. Then I examine how they use these ties very differently later in practice. Oilfield workers often use their fictive kin ties to move up and around the industry across space, time, and companies: amplifying ties. In contrast, agricultural workers renew the same strong ties for survival from season to season, maintaining cyclical ties. The comparison highlights how industry mobility ladders, tempos, and geographies affect how workers can use their networks in practice. While both agricultural and oilfield workers become fictive kin in situations of intense proximity, structural differences give their networks unequal reach.
不平等的影响:得克萨斯州农业和油田工人之间的循环和扩大关系
农业、石油和天然气工人在现场形成了什么样的联系,他们以后如何利用这种联系?为什么它们的使用方式不同?学术研究强调,弱关系可以将人们与有价值的信息联系起来,而强关系对日常生存至关重要。然而,随着时间和空间的推移,许多机制会影响员工如何形成和使用社交网络。通过对德克萨斯州农业和油田工人的60次访谈和观察,我研究了这两个群体在远离家乡的田野里共同生活时是如何形成强大的实际亲属关系的——共享资源,分享生殖劳动,并使用家庭话语来描述这些关系。然后,我研究了他们在后来的实践中如何使用这些领带。油田工人经常利用他们有效的亲属关系,跨越空间、时间和公司,在行业中向上移动,扩大联系。相比之下,农业工人为了生存,一个季节又一个季节地更新着同样牢固的联系,保持着周期性的联系。这一对比凸显了行业流动阶梯、节奏和地域如何影响员工在实践中如何使用他们的网络。虽然农业和油田工人在高度接近的情况下都成为有效的亲属,但结构差异使他们的网络覆盖范围不平等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
24.10%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: For over 30 years, Work and Occupations has published rigorous social science research on the human dynamics of the workplace, employment, and society from an international, interdisciplinary perspective. Work and Occupations provides you with a broad perspective on the workplace, examining international approaches to work-related issues as well as insights from scholars in a variety of fields, including: anthropology, demography, education, government administration, history, industrial relations, labour economics, management, psychology, and sociology. In addition to regular features including research notes, review essays, and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信