Investigação sob a ótica da judicialização da saúde sobre Unidade de Terapia Intensiva no Município de São Luís/MA

IF 0.1 Q4 LAW
Adriana Alves Fernandes Costa, A. M. Pitta, E. Ramos
{"title":"Investigação sob a ótica da judicialização da saúde sobre Unidade de Terapia Intensiva no Município de São Luís/MA","authors":"Adriana Alves Fernandes Costa, A. M. Pitta, E. Ramos","doi":"10.11606/issn.2316-9044.v20i2p69-89","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Study on the judicialization of health relative to the granting of beds of adult intensive care units, through the Judicial Power in the Brazilian state of Maranhao. The objective of this study is to understand the phenomenon of judicialization, based on the characteristics of the lawsuits in relation to claimant, defendant and process, understanding the judges’ criteria for their decisions and verifying compliance with these decisions, due to the significant increase in the number of lawsuits originated by the demand of beds in adult intensive care units in Sao Luis, capital of the state of Maranhao. It is a documentary study, with a selection of 25 legal cases with final judgments, containing an intensive care unit request, occurred between January 2009 and February 2016. The results showed that individual actions with an adult intensive care unit demand corresponded to 100%; actions with the representation of a private lawyer, 60%; from the public health service, 64%; male gender, 56%; and elderly people in the age range between 80-99 years, 44% being these the revailing processes among those selected and analyzed. The majority of judges used the BrazilianConstitution of 1988 markedly the right to health, as the criterion for decision-making. In compliance with the decisions, a greater number of patients had access to intensive care units. In view of the need for dialogue between the Executive and Judicial powers, to expedite the fulfillment of demands, the importance of the sanitary mediation institute is increasing as a more effective alternative of negotiation between public and private health systems and the Judicial Poweror all.","PeriodicalId":42266,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Direito Sanitario-Journal of Health Law","volume":"20 1","pages":"69-89"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Direito Sanitario-Journal of Health Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2316-9044.v20i2p69-89","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Study on the judicialization of health relative to the granting of beds of adult intensive care units, through the Judicial Power in the Brazilian state of Maranhao. The objective of this study is to understand the phenomenon of judicialization, based on the characteristics of the lawsuits in relation to claimant, defendant and process, understanding the judges’ criteria for their decisions and verifying compliance with these decisions, due to the significant increase in the number of lawsuits originated by the demand of beds in adult intensive care units in Sao Luis, capital of the state of Maranhao. It is a documentary study, with a selection of 25 legal cases with final judgments, containing an intensive care unit request, occurred between January 2009 and February 2016. The results showed that individual actions with an adult intensive care unit demand corresponded to 100%; actions with the representation of a private lawyer, 60%; from the public health service, 64%; male gender, 56%; and elderly people in the age range between 80-99 years, 44% being these the revailing processes among those selected and analyzed. The majority of judges used the BrazilianConstitution of 1988 markedly the right to health, as the criterion for decision-making. In compliance with the decisions, a greater number of patients had access to intensive care units. In view of the need for dialogue between the Executive and Judicial powers, to expedite the fulfillment of demands, the importance of the sanitary mediation institute is increasing as a more effective alternative of negotiation between public and private health systems and the Judicial Poweror all.
从sao luis /MA市重症监护室健康合法化的角度进行的调查
通过巴西马拉尼昂州的司法权,研究与授予成人重症监护病房床位有关的健康司法化问题。由于马拉尼昂州首府圣路易斯因成人重症监护病房床位需求而引发的诉讼数量大幅增加,本研究的目的是了解司法化现象,基于与原告、被告和程序有关的诉讼特征,了解法官的判决标准并验证这些判决的遵守情况。这是一项文献研究,选择了2009年1月至2016年2月期间发生的25起具有最终判决的法律案件,其中包含重症监护病房请求。结果表明,个体行为与成人重症监护病房需求的对应率为100%;由私人律师代理的诉讼占60%;来自公共卫生服务,64%;男性占56%;年龄在80-99岁之间的老年人中,44%的人在这些被选择和分析的人群中出现了这些症状。多数法官将1988年《巴西宪法》中明确规定的健康权作为决策标准。根据这些决定,更多的病人可以进入重症监护病房。鉴于行政权力和司法权力之间需要对话,以加快满足要求,卫生调解机构的重要性日益增加,因为它是公共和私人保健系统与司法权力之间谈判的更有效的替代办法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
52 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信