Japanese version of the Personal Outcomes Scale for persons with intellectual disability: Validity and reliability

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
M. Tatsuta, N. Kawai, M. Ushiyama, M. Lombardi
{"title":"Japanese version of the Personal Outcomes Scale for persons with intellectual disability: Validity and reliability","authors":"M. Tatsuta, N. Kawai, M. Ushiyama, M. Lombardi","doi":"10.3109/13668250.2022.2086109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Background The Personal Outcomes Scale is a measurement tool to examine quality of life among persons with intellectual disability. This paper addressed the validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the scale using both self-reports and reports of others. Method Data were collected from 128 people with intellectual disability (90 men and 38 women; M age = 37.19 ± 11.90 (range = 19–69) years) and 27 support workers. Reliability was examined by Cronbach's alpha coefficients, inter-respondent reliability coefficients, and test-retest reliability. Validity was examined by construct validity and criteria-related validity. Results Self- and other-reported versions showed adequate internal consistency (α = 0.79); however, some domains had relatively low internal consistency. Validity tests showed weak to moderate correlations between the total score and the domain scores in both versions. Conclusions The scale is reliable overall; however, cultural aspects should be considered to bolster its reliability for practical application.","PeriodicalId":51466,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/13668250.2022.2086109","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background The Personal Outcomes Scale is a measurement tool to examine quality of life among persons with intellectual disability. This paper addressed the validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the scale using both self-reports and reports of others. Method Data were collected from 128 people with intellectual disability (90 men and 38 women; M age = 37.19 ± 11.90 (range = 19–69) years) and 27 support workers. Reliability was examined by Cronbach's alpha coefficients, inter-respondent reliability coefficients, and test-retest reliability. Validity was examined by construct validity and criteria-related validity. Results Self- and other-reported versions showed adequate internal consistency (α = 0.79); however, some domains had relatively low internal consistency. Validity tests showed weak to moderate correlations between the total score and the domain scores in both versions. Conclusions The scale is reliable overall; however, cultural aspects should be considered to bolster its reliability for practical application.
智障人士个人成果量表的日文版:有效性和可靠性
摘要背景个人结果量表是一种衡量智障患者生活质量的工具。本文通过自我报告和其他人的报告,探讨了日语版量表的有效性和可靠性。方法收集128名智障患者的数据(男90名,女38名 = 37.19±11.90(范围 = 19–69)岁)和27名护工。信度采用Cronbachα系数、被调查者间信度系数和重测信度进行检验。通过结构有效性和标准相关有效性来检验有效性。结果自我报告和其他报告的版本显示出足够的内部一致性(α = 0.79);然而,一些领域的内部一致性相对较低。有效性测试显示,两个版本的总分和领域得分之间存在弱到中等的相关性。结论该量表总体可靠;然而,应该考虑文化因素,以增强其在实际应用中的可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
7.70%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability (formerly the Australia and New Zealand Journal of Developmental Disabilities) is the official journal of the Australasian Society for the Study of Intellectual Disability (ASSID). JIDD is an international, multidisciplinary journal in the field of intellectual and developmental disability. The journal publishes original qualitative and quantitative research papers, literature reviews, conceptual articles, brief reports, case reports, data briefs, and opinions and perspectives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信