When investors meet consumers: The roles and interactions of different backers in the crowdfunding market

IF 2.8 4区 管理学 Q2 MANAGEMENT
Feiqiong Wei, Yinliang (Ricky) Tan, Haibing Gao, Huazhong Zhao
{"title":"When investors meet consumers: The roles and interactions of different backers in the crowdfunding market","authors":"Feiqiong Wei,&nbsp;Yinliang (Ricky) Tan,&nbsp;Haibing Gao,&nbsp;Huazhong Zhao","doi":"10.1111/deci.12612","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>By harnessing the power of the crowd, crowdfunding has changed the way startup ventures, innovation-minded entrepreneurs, and private individuals raise capital. Reward-based crowdfunding is an established and attractive fundraising option for entrepreneurs with creative projects, while investment-based crowdfunding has also gained popularity thanks to the progress of related regulations. Both types of crowdfunding are drawing a growing number of startups that seek funding opportunities, although backers on different types of crowdfunding platforms exhibit distinct motivations. Understanding the behavior and interaction of different types of backers is thus critical for a startup to launch a successful crowdfunding campaign across distinct platforms.</p><p>To address this issue, we conduct a field study on a popular crowdfunding platform, where each campaign offered both reward- and investment-based funding. Interestingly, we find a positive relationship between investor contributions in the early stage of the campaign and the likelihood of the campaign's success. Our empirical analysis reveals that investor–consumer interaction mediates the main effect of early investor contributions. Moreover, the positive main effect is stronger when a larger amount of project-relevant information is released and when a higher level of customization (using price discrimination or product differentiation) is offered in reward-based funding options. These results are consistent with several robustness checks. Our findings provide relevant managerial implications for entrepreneurs and valuable insights regarding platform design.</p>","PeriodicalId":48256,"journal":{"name":"DECISION SCIENCES","volume":"55 5","pages":"474-490"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DECISION SCIENCES","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/deci.12612","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

By harnessing the power of the crowd, crowdfunding has changed the way startup ventures, innovation-minded entrepreneurs, and private individuals raise capital. Reward-based crowdfunding is an established and attractive fundraising option for entrepreneurs with creative projects, while investment-based crowdfunding has also gained popularity thanks to the progress of related regulations. Both types of crowdfunding are drawing a growing number of startups that seek funding opportunities, although backers on different types of crowdfunding platforms exhibit distinct motivations. Understanding the behavior and interaction of different types of backers is thus critical for a startup to launch a successful crowdfunding campaign across distinct platforms.

To address this issue, we conduct a field study on a popular crowdfunding platform, where each campaign offered both reward- and investment-based funding. Interestingly, we find a positive relationship between investor contributions in the early stage of the campaign and the likelihood of the campaign's success. Our empirical analysis reveals that investor–consumer interaction mediates the main effect of early investor contributions. Moreover, the positive main effect is stronger when a larger amount of project-relevant information is released and when a higher level of customization (using price discrimination or product differentiation) is offered in reward-based funding options. These results are consistent with several robustness checks. Our findings provide relevant managerial implications for entrepreneurs and valuable insights regarding platform design.

当投资者遇到消费者:众筹市场中不同支持者的角色和互动
通过利用大众的力量,众筹改变了初创企业、有创新意识的企业家和个人筹集资金的方式。对于有创意项目的企业家来说,基于奖励的众筹是一种成熟且有吸引力的筹资选择,而基于投资的众筹也因相关法规的进展而广受欢迎。这两种类型的众筹都吸引了越来越多寻求融资机会的初创公司,尽管不同类型众筹平台上的支持者表现出不同的动机。因此,了解不同类型支持者的行为和互动对于初创公司在不同平台上成功发起众筹活动至关重要。为了解决这个问题,我们在一个受欢迎的众筹平台上进行了实地研究,在该平台上,每个活动都提供基于奖励和投资的资金。有趣的是,我们发现投资者在活动早期的贡献与活动成功的可能性之间存在正相关关系。我们的实证分析表明,投资者与消费者的互动调节了早期投资者贡献的主要影响。此外,当发布更多与项目相关的信息时,以及当在基于奖励的资金选择中提供更高水平的定制(使用价格歧视或产品差异化)时,积极的主效应更强。这些结果与几个稳健性检查一致。我们的研究结果为企业家提供了相关的管理启示,并为平台设计提供了宝贵的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
DECISION SCIENCES
DECISION SCIENCES MANAGEMENT-
CiteScore
12.40
自引率
1.80%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Decision Sciences, a premier journal of the Decision Sciences Institute, publishes scholarly research about decision making within the boundaries of an organization, as well as decisions involving inter-firm coordination. The journal promotes research advancing decision making at the interfaces of business functions and organizational boundaries. The journal also seeks articles extending established lines of work assuming the results of the research have the potential to substantially impact either decision making theory or industry practice. Ground-breaking research articles that enhance managerial understanding of decision making processes and stimulate further research in multi-disciplinary domains are particularly encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信