The representation of laboratory activities in Indonesian physics textbooks: a content analysis

IF 1.8 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
S. Gumilar, A. Ismail
{"title":"The representation of laboratory activities in Indonesian physics textbooks: a content analysis","authors":"S. Gumilar, A. Ismail","doi":"10.1080/02635143.2021.1928045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Background Physics textbooks are a learning resource for students to acquire knowledge and information. The findings of previous studies on physics textbooks analysis have mostly focused on representations of gender, the nature of science, and scientific literacy. This study, therefore, extends the critical content analysis of physics textbooks to examine the levels of laboratory activities as empirical evidence among domination of previous studies in analysing physics textbooks. Purpose To investigate the representation of the laboratory activities in Indonesian physics textbooks and teachers’ perspectives on the use of the textbooks in facilitating laboratory activities. Method Content analysis was used to elicit data on laboratory activities and the semi-structured interview was used to reveal teachers’ perspectives on the use of the textbooks. The Inquiry Level Index and Laboratory Assessment Inventory were used as the main analytical framework for distinguishing levels of these activities. In addition, thematic analysis was adopted to analyse teachers’ perspectives on the use of textbooks in the classroom. Results A dominant type of laboratory activity was Level One, which presents questions and methods as a guide for conducting laboratory activities, whereby students have to find solutions to problems. Concerning teachers’ perspectives, the use of physics textbooks was found to not align with curriculum needs, which emphasise open laboratory activities. Conclusion The representation of laboratory activities in textbooks encourages students to develop a low level of inquiry. Textbooks do not facilitate students in developing their understanding through hands-on activities. This is supported by the role of teachers who use laboratory activities only to verify concepts learned in the classroom. Consequently, several changes are required to underpin the implementation of open laboratory activities, such as the role of teachers in designing these activities and the assessments used.","PeriodicalId":46656,"journal":{"name":"Research in Science & Technological Education","volume":"41 1","pages":"614 - 634"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/02635143.2021.1928045","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Science & Technological Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2021.1928045","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Physics textbooks are a learning resource for students to acquire knowledge and information. The findings of previous studies on physics textbooks analysis have mostly focused on representations of gender, the nature of science, and scientific literacy. This study, therefore, extends the critical content analysis of physics textbooks to examine the levels of laboratory activities as empirical evidence among domination of previous studies in analysing physics textbooks. Purpose To investigate the representation of the laboratory activities in Indonesian physics textbooks and teachers’ perspectives on the use of the textbooks in facilitating laboratory activities. Method Content analysis was used to elicit data on laboratory activities and the semi-structured interview was used to reveal teachers’ perspectives on the use of the textbooks. The Inquiry Level Index and Laboratory Assessment Inventory were used as the main analytical framework for distinguishing levels of these activities. In addition, thematic analysis was adopted to analyse teachers’ perspectives on the use of textbooks in the classroom. Results A dominant type of laboratory activity was Level One, which presents questions and methods as a guide for conducting laboratory activities, whereby students have to find solutions to problems. Concerning teachers’ perspectives, the use of physics textbooks was found to not align with curriculum needs, which emphasise open laboratory activities. Conclusion The representation of laboratory activities in textbooks encourages students to develop a low level of inquiry. Textbooks do not facilitate students in developing their understanding through hands-on activities. This is supported by the role of teachers who use laboratory activities only to verify concepts learned in the classroom. Consequently, several changes are required to underpin the implementation of open laboratory activities, such as the role of teachers in designing these activities and the assessments used.
印尼物理教科书中实验活动的表现:内容分析
物理教材是学生获取知识和信息的学习资源。以往对物理教科书分析的研究结果主要集中在性别表征、科学本质和科学素养方面。因此,本研究扩展了物理教科书的批判性内容分析,在以往分析物理教科书的研究中,作为经验证据来检验实验室活动的水平。目的调查印尼物理教科书中实验活动的表现,以及教师使用教科书促进实验活动的观点。方法采用内容分析方法获取实验活动数据,采用半结构化访谈法了解教师对教材使用的看法。调查水平指数和实验室评估清单被用作区分这些活动水平的主要分析框架。此外,采用主题分析法分析教师对课堂教材使用的看法。结果一级实验活动占主导地位,提出问题和方法,指导学生进行实验活动,学生必须找到问题的解决方案。从教师的角度来看,物理教科书的使用与强调开放实验室活动的课程需求不一致。结论教科书中对实验活动的描述鼓励学生发展低水平的探究。课本不能帮助学生通过实践活动来发展他们的理解。这得到了教师角色的支持,他们使用实验室活动只是为了验证在课堂上学到的概念。因此,需要进行一些改变来支持开放实验室活动的实施,例如教师在设计这些活动和使用评估中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Research in Science & Technological Education
Research in Science & Technological Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
39
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信