Laying a foundation for critical professional development through a research–practice partnership

IF 2.1 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
H. Parkhouse, Jesse Senechal, Elizabeth Severson-Irby
{"title":"Laying a foundation for critical professional development through a research–practice partnership","authors":"H. Parkhouse, Jesse Senechal, Elizabeth Severson-Irby","doi":"10.1080/19415257.2023.2193198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Much of the formal professional development teachers experience consists of short-term workshops that maintain – rather than disrupt – the systems of power that reproduce educational inequities. In response, some scholars have advocated critical professional development (PD) as a means of supporting teachers’ interrogation of these inequities and empowerment to effect change. Critical PD is based on Paulo Freire’s ideas of dialogue, problem-posing, and praxis, and it tends to emerge within grassroots organisations that function independently from the school systems. There are two drawbacks to this autonomous structure, however: the legitimacy problem, or the fact that the pedagogies advocated within these groups may be difficult to implement without the institutional support of participants’ districts; and the resource problem, or the fact that teachers’ time and efforts within these independent organisations is typically uncompensated. In this essay, we describe a research – practice partnership in which we co-developed critical PD on culturally responsive teaching with district leaders. The form of the PD, critical action research, allowed the participants to engage in problem-posing and praxis in order to analyse systems of power and their own positionalities within these systems. Recommendations for those with and without access to research – practice partnerships are offered.","PeriodicalId":47497,"journal":{"name":"Professional Development in Education","volume":"49 1","pages":"725 - 738"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Professional Development in Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2023.2193198","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Much of the formal professional development teachers experience consists of short-term workshops that maintain – rather than disrupt – the systems of power that reproduce educational inequities. In response, some scholars have advocated critical professional development (PD) as a means of supporting teachers’ interrogation of these inequities and empowerment to effect change. Critical PD is based on Paulo Freire’s ideas of dialogue, problem-posing, and praxis, and it tends to emerge within grassroots organisations that function independently from the school systems. There are two drawbacks to this autonomous structure, however: the legitimacy problem, or the fact that the pedagogies advocated within these groups may be difficult to implement without the institutional support of participants’ districts; and the resource problem, or the fact that teachers’ time and efforts within these independent organisations is typically uncompensated. In this essay, we describe a research – practice partnership in which we co-developed critical PD on culturally responsive teaching with district leaders. The form of the PD, critical action research, allowed the participants to engage in problem-posing and praxis in order to analyse systems of power and their own positionalities within these systems. Recommendations for those with and without access to research – practice partnerships are offered.
通过研究与实践的合作关系为关键的专业发展奠定基础
摘要教师的大部分正式专业发展经历都是短期研讨会,这些研讨会维护而不是破坏了再现教育不平等的权力体系。作为回应,一些学者主张批判性专业发展(PD)作为一种手段,支持教师对这些不公平现象的审问,并赋予教师权力以实现变革。批判性PD基于保罗·弗雷尔的对话、提出问题和实践理念,它往往出现在独立于学校系统运作的基层组织中。然而,这种自治结构有两个缺点:合法性问题,或者如果没有参与者所在地区的制度支持,这些群体内倡导的教学法可能很难实施;以及资源问题,或者教师在这些独立组织中的时间和精力通常是无偿的。在这篇文章中,我们描述了一种研究-实践伙伴关系,在这种伙伴关系中,我们与地区领导人共同开发了关于文化响应教学的批判性PD。PD的形式,即批判性行动研究,允许参与者参与问题提出和实践,以分析权力体系及其在这些体系中的地位。为那些有机会和没有机会获得研究-实践伙伴关系的人提供了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Professional Development in Education
Professional Development in Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
27
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信