Waiting during disasters: Negotiating the spatio-temporalities of resilience and recovery

IF 2.9 2区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Gemma Sou, Kirsten Howarth
{"title":"Waiting during disasters: Negotiating the spatio-temporalities of resilience and recovery","authors":"Gemma Sou,&nbsp;Kirsten Howarth","doi":"10.1111/1745-5871.12583","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Always spatial, <i>waiting time</i> is the observation of past-present-future, and <i>temporality</i> is the condition of being bounded by time. Both are mechanisms of state governance that control how and when families recover from rapid-onset humanitarian disasters. Analysing these <i>spatio-temporalities</i> reveals how families leverage resources to engage in acts of resilience that challenge the state’s spatio-temporal control of recovery. A case study focuses on the aftermath of Hurricane Maria, which devastated Puerto Rico in 2017. We draw on qualitative longitudinal research to explore politicised spatio-temporal experiences of waiting for the state to fix public infrastructures; approve financial support; and provide access to affordable consumables—which all shape families’ recovery rates and pathways. Disaster-affected families do not passively wait for the state and often leverage their incomes and social networks to engage in resilience-based strategies that ease their everyday lives and enable recovery while waiting for the state. Waiting feels more arduous for families with fewer resources and when there is uncertainty about access to the state and how and when to begin certain recovery activities. Waiting in disasters can also provide space for collective socio-political practices such as community gardening to emerge in neighbourhoods. For researchers of disasters, this article highlights the spatio-temporal dimensions of grassroots resilience and the ways in which state power and citizen agency interact in ways that subvert state control of families’ recovery rates in heterogeneous ways. Research on waiting during disasters has great potential to inform and reform governance for resilience and recovery.</p>","PeriodicalId":47233,"journal":{"name":"Geographical Research","volume":"61 2","pages":"273-284"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1745-5871.12583","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geographical Research","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1745-5871.12583","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Always spatial, waiting time is the observation of past-present-future, and temporality is the condition of being bounded by time. Both are mechanisms of state governance that control how and when families recover from rapid-onset humanitarian disasters. Analysing these spatio-temporalities reveals how families leverage resources to engage in acts of resilience that challenge the state’s spatio-temporal control of recovery. A case study focuses on the aftermath of Hurricane Maria, which devastated Puerto Rico in 2017. We draw on qualitative longitudinal research to explore politicised spatio-temporal experiences of waiting for the state to fix public infrastructures; approve financial support; and provide access to affordable consumables—which all shape families’ recovery rates and pathways. Disaster-affected families do not passively wait for the state and often leverage their incomes and social networks to engage in resilience-based strategies that ease their everyday lives and enable recovery while waiting for the state. Waiting feels more arduous for families with fewer resources and when there is uncertainty about access to the state and how and when to begin certain recovery activities. Waiting in disasters can also provide space for collective socio-political practices such as community gardening to emerge in neighbourhoods. For researchers of disasters, this article highlights the spatio-temporal dimensions of grassroots resilience and the ways in which state power and citizen agency interact in ways that subvert state control of families’ recovery rates in heterogeneous ways. Research on waiting during disasters has great potential to inform and reform governance for resilience and recovery.

Abstract Image

灾害期间的等待:谈判复原力和恢复的时空性
等待的时间总是空间的,是对过去-现在-未来的观察,而时间性是受时间限制的条件。两者都是国家治理机制,控制家庭如何以及何时从迅速发生的人道主义灾难中恢复过来。分析这些时空性揭示了家庭如何利用资源参与挑战国家对恢复的时空控制的弹性行为。一个案例研究的重点是飓风玛丽亚的后果,飓风玛丽亚在2017年摧毁了波多黎各。我们利用定性纵向研究来探索等待国家修复公共基础设施的政治化时空经验;批准财政支持;并提供负担得起的消耗品——这些都影响着家庭的康复率和康复途径。受灾家庭不会被动地等待政府救援,他们往往会利用自己的收入和社会网络,采取基于韧性的战略,在等待政府救援的同时,缓解日常生活的压力,实现灾后恢复。对于资源较少的家庭来说,当不确定是否能获得政府救助以及如何以及何时开始某些恢复活动时,等待会变得更加艰难。灾难中的等待也可以为社区出现社区园艺等集体社会政治实践提供空间。对于灾害研究人员来说,本文强调了基层恢复力的时空维度,以及国家权力和公民机构相互作用的方式,这些方式以不同的方式颠覆了国家对家庭恢复率的控制。对灾害期间等待的研究具有很大的潜力,可以为抗灾能力和恢复的治理提供信息和改革。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
12.10%
发文量
0
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信