Students' beliefs about the nature of intelligence (mindset).

IF 2.2 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Journal of Adolescent Research Pub Date : 2022-07-01 Epub Date: 2020-10-26 DOI:10.1177/0743558420967113
Emmy de Kraker-Pauw, Floryt van Wesel, Lydia Krabbendam, Nienke van Atteveldt
{"title":"Students' beliefs about the nature of intelligence (mindset).","authors":"Emmy de Kraker-Pauw, Floryt van Wesel, Lydia Krabbendam, Nienke van Atteveldt","doi":"10.1177/0743558420967113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Important adolescents' career-related decisions might be influenced by their beliefs about malleability of intelligence and learning (mindset). We combined quantitative and qualitative data to provide in-depth insights in the beliefs that 13-14-year-olds hold about learning and intelligence, the factors influencing these beliefs, and the consequences of these beliefs in relation to classroom behaviour and study choices. To establish students' mindsets quantitatively, we categorised theory of intelligence questionnaire (TOI; Dweck, 1999) averaged scores into three levels: entity, intermediate or incremental mindsets, to provide insight into the distribution of the different mindset types in our sample (N = 492). The results of this quantitative study show that more than half of the students believed intelligence is \"fixed\" (entity mindset), these data showed no effect of gender. To gain more in-depth insight in the views of these students, focus groups about mindset and its influences and consequences were held in a subsample (n = 176). The qualitative data provide more nuanced insights, for example they reveal subtle gender differences regarding effort beliefs and motivation. Integrated discussion of the quantitative and qualitative results demonstrates that this multi-method approach reflects the complexity of the concept mindset better than only the widely used TOI questionnaire.</p>","PeriodicalId":47949,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Adolescent Research","volume":"37 1","pages":"607-636"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7612839/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Adolescent Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0743558420967113","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/10/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Important adolescents' career-related decisions might be influenced by their beliefs about malleability of intelligence and learning (mindset). We combined quantitative and qualitative data to provide in-depth insights in the beliefs that 13-14-year-olds hold about learning and intelligence, the factors influencing these beliefs, and the consequences of these beliefs in relation to classroom behaviour and study choices. To establish students' mindsets quantitatively, we categorised theory of intelligence questionnaire (TOI; Dweck, 1999) averaged scores into three levels: entity, intermediate or incremental mindsets, to provide insight into the distribution of the different mindset types in our sample (N = 492). The results of this quantitative study show that more than half of the students believed intelligence is "fixed" (entity mindset), these data showed no effect of gender. To gain more in-depth insight in the views of these students, focus groups about mindset and its influences and consequences were held in a subsample (n = 176). The qualitative data provide more nuanced insights, for example they reveal subtle gender differences regarding effort beliefs and motivation. Integrated discussion of the quantitative and qualitative results demonstrates that this multi-method approach reflects the complexity of the concept mindset better than only the widely used TOI questionnaire.

学生对智力本质的看法(心态)
重要青少年的职业相关决策可能会受到他们对智力和学习(心态)可塑性的信念的影响。我们结合了定量和定性数据,对13岁和14岁的青少年对学习和智力的信念、影响这些信念的因素以及这些信念与课堂行为和学习选择的关系提供了深入的见解。为了定量地建立学生的心态,我们将智力理论(TOI)问卷的平均得分分为三个层次:实体心态、中间心态或增量心态,以深入了解样本中不同心态类型的分布(N=492)。这项定量研究的结果表明,超过一半的学生认为智力是“固定的”(实体心态),这些数据没有显示性别的影响。为了更深入地了解这些学生的观点,在一个子样本中举行了关于心态及其影响和后果的焦点小组(n=176)。定性数据提供了更细微的见解,例如,它们揭示了在努力信念和动机方面的细微性别差异。对定量和定性结果的综合讨论表明,这种多方法比仅广泛使用的TOI问卷更能反映概念心态的复杂性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Adolescent Research
Journal of Adolescent Research PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
5.00%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: The aim of the Journal of Adolescent Research is to publish lively, creative, and informative articles on development during adolescence (ages 10-18) and emerging adulthood (ages 18-25). The journal encourages papers that use qualitative, ethnographic, or other methods that present the voices of adolescents. Few strictly quantitative, questionnaire-based articles are published in the Journal of Adolescent Research, unless they break new ground in a previously understudied area. However, papers that combine qualitative and quantitative data are especially welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信