Majority members’ acculturation: How proximal-acculturation relates to expectations of immigrants and intergroup ideologies over time

IF 4 2区心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL

Group Processes & Intergroup Relations Pub Date : 2022-05-13 DOI:10.1177/13684302221096324

Katharina Lefringhausen, T. Marshall, Nelli Ferenczi, Hanna Zagefka, J. Kunst

{"title":"Majority members’ acculturation: How proximal-acculturation relates to expectations of immigrants and intergroup ideologies over time","authors":"Katharina Lefringhausen, T. Marshall, Nelli Ferenczi, Hanna Zagefka, J. Kunst","doi":"10.1177/13684302221096324","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"How do English majority members’ national culture maintenance and immigrant culture adoption (i.e., globalisation-based proximal-acculturation) predict their acculturation expectations (i.e., how they think immigrants should acculturate) and intergroup ideologies (i.e., how they think society should manage diversity)? Cross-sectional results (N = 220) supported hypothesised relationships using a variable- and person-centred approach: welcoming expectations/ideologies related positively to immigrant culture adoption (or an integration/assimilation strategy) and negatively to national culture maintenance (or a separation strategy), whilst the reverse was true for unwelcoming expectations/ideologies. Notably, colourblindness showed only weak correlations with/differences across acculturation orientations/strategies. In longitudinal analyses, adopting immigrants’ cultures increased the intergroup ideologies polyculturalism and multiculturalism whilst reducing support for assimilation over time, whereas national culture maintenance had the opposite effect. Meanwhile, the expectation integration-transformation was especially related to higher odds of following an integration rather than separation strategy over time. Overall, results advance the psychological study of multiculturalism, providing first longitudinal insights on majority members’ acculturation.","PeriodicalId":48099,"journal":{"name":"Group Processes & Intergroup Relations","volume":"26 1","pages":"953 - 984"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Group Processes & Intergroup Relations","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13684302221096324","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 7

Abstract

How do English majority members’ national culture maintenance and immigrant culture adoption (i.e., globalisation-based proximal-acculturation) predict their acculturation expectations (i.e., how they think immigrants should acculturate) and intergroup ideologies (i.e., how they think society should manage diversity)? Cross-sectional results (N = 220) supported hypothesised relationships using a variable- and person-centred approach: welcoming expectations/ideologies related positively to immigrant culture adoption (or an integration/assimilation strategy) and negatively to national culture maintenance (or a separation strategy), whilst the reverse was true for unwelcoming expectations/ideologies. Notably, colourblindness showed only weak correlations with/differences across acculturation orientations/strategies. In longitudinal analyses, adopting immigrants’ cultures increased the intergroup ideologies polyculturalism and multiculturalism whilst reducing support for assimilation over time, whereas national culture maintenance had the opposite effect. Meanwhile, the expectation integration-transformation was especially related to higher odds of following an integration rather than separation strategy over time. Overall, results advance the psychological study of multiculturalism, providing first longitudinal insights on majority members’ acculturation.

查看原文本刊更多论文

多数成员的文化适应：随着时间的推移，近端文化适应如何与移民和群体间意识形态的期望相关

英语多数派成员的民族文化维护和移民文化采纳(即基于全球化的近文化适应)如何预测他们的文化适应期望(即他们认为移民应该如何适应文化)和群体间意识形态(即他们认为社会应该如何管理多样性)?横断面结果(N = 220)使用变量和以人为中心的方法支持假设的关系:欢迎期望/意识形态与移民文化采用(或整合/同化策略)呈正相关，与国家文化维护(或分离策略)负相关，而不欢迎期望/意识形态则相反。值得注意的是，色盲与文化适应取向/策略之间的差异只有微弱的相关性。在纵向分析中，接受移民文化增加了群体间意识形态的多元文化主义和多元文化主义，同时随着时间的推移减少了对同化的支持，而维持民族文化则具有相反的效果。同时，随着时间的推移，期望集成-转换尤其与遵循集成而不是分离策略的更高几率相关。总体而言，研究结果推动了多元文化主义的心理学研究，首次提供了大多数成员文化适应的纵向见解。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Group Processes & Intergroup Relations PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL-

CiteScore

8.50

自引率

4.50%

发文量

期刊介绍： Group Processes & Intergroup Relations is a scientific social psychology journal dedicated to research on social psychological processes within and between groups. It provides a forum for and is aimed at researchers and students in social psychology and related disciples (e.g., organizational and management sciences, political science, sociology, language and communication, cross cultural psychology, international relations) that have a scientific interest in the social psychology of human groups. The journal has an extensive editorial team that includes many if not most of the leading scholars in social psychology of group processes and intergroup relations from around the world.