“But it wasn’t like that”: The impact of visits to community-based museums on young people’s understanding of the commemorated past in a divided society

IF 2.5 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
A. McCully, Magdalena Weiglhofer, Jessica Bates
{"title":"“But it wasn’t like that”: The impact of visits to community-based museums on young people’s understanding of the commemorated past in a divided society","authors":"A. McCully, Magdalena Weiglhofer, Jessica Bates","doi":"10.1080/00933104.2021.1899090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article reports on the impact visits to community-based museums in a divided society, Northern Ireland, had on young people’s historical, political, and cultural understanding of the commemorated past. It examines the responses of two student groups, one predominantly Protestant and the other Catholic, to two museums, each presenting its own community’s perspective on one contentious aspect of Derry/Londonderry’s past. Data were collected through observation, focus groups, and semi-structured interviews from students, teachers, and museum staff. In the emotive environments of the two museums, findings indicated that community background remained important in shaping responses, but critical thinking allied to personal engagement with testimony and artifacts, particularly related to the recent, contentious past, was also influential. In one group, the experience was powerful in causing affective disruption, which challenged established positions, but in the other, it largely consolidated existing norms.","PeriodicalId":46808,"journal":{"name":"Theory and Research in Social Education","volume":"49 1","pages":"510 - 539"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00933104.2021.1899090","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theory and Research in Social Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2021.1899090","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article reports on the impact visits to community-based museums in a divided society, Northern Ireland, had on young people’s historical, political, and cultural understanding of the commemorated past. It examines the responses of two student groups, one predominantly Protestant and the other Catholic, to two museums, each presenting its own community’s perspective on one contentious aspect of Derry/Londonderry’s past. Data were collected through observation, focus groups, and semi-structured interviews from students, teachers, and museum staff. In the emotive environments of the two museums, findings indicated that community background remained important in shaping responses, but critical thinking allied to personal engagement with testimony and artifacts, particularly related to the recent, contentious past, was also influential. In one group, the experience was powerful in causing affective disruption, which challenged established positions, but in the other, it largely consolidated existing norms.
“但事实并非如此”:在一个分裂的社会中,参观社区博物馆对年轻人理解被纪念的过去的影响
摘要本文报道了在北爱尔兰一个分裂的社会中,参观以社区为基础的博物馆对年轻人对被纪念的过去的历史、政治和文化理解的影响。它考察了两个学生团体,一个主要是新教徒,另一个是天主教徒,对两个博物馆的反应,每个博物馆都展示了自己社区对德里/伦敦德里过去一个有争议的方面的看法。数据是通过观察、焦点小组和半结构化访谈从学生、教师和博物馆工作人员那里收集的。在这两个博物馆的情感环境中,研究结果表明,社区背景在形成反应方面仍然很重要,但与个人参与证词和文物相关的批判性思维,特别是与最近有争议的过去有关的批判性思维也很有影响力。在一组人中,这种经历在很大程度上导致了情感上的破坏,这对既定的立场提出了挑战,但在另一组人身上,它在很大程度上将现有的规范整合在一起。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Theory and Research in Social Education
Theory and Research in Social Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
30.80%
发文量
36
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信