The place of master theses in music performance education in Sweden: subjects, purposes, justifications

IF 1.8 3区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Nadia Moberg
{"title":"The place of master theses in music performance education in Sweden: subjects, purposes, justifications","authors":"Nadia Moberg","doi":"10.1080/14613808.2023.2167966","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT While writing is undeniably an essential part of higher education, in music education, musical performance skills form the core of assessing students’ results. However, higher music education is experiencing growing demands on research activities parallel to heightened requirements on music performance students’ abilities to formulate themselves around their main field of study. This paper turns to theses as discursive acts embedded in higher music education. The present study investigates how master theses construct educational ideals by analysing written components of successfully completed theses within music performance programmes in Sweden. The paper shows that the theses treat a variety of subjects which are justified from five different perspectives: Improve, Succeed, Share, Acclaim or to Discover. Two diametrically opposed kinds of purpose statements are revealed; they appear as either impersonal and distanced or intimate and personal. Influences of traditional academic writing manifest themselves while conservatory ideals around craft, individualism and hierarchies are reproduced. It is argued that the self-exploratory approach – which is a characteristic feature on an overall level – excludes collective knowledge building as well as social perspectives on art and music.","PeriodicalId":46798,"journal":{"name":"Music Education Research","volume":"25 1","pages":"24 - 35"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Music Education Research","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14613808.2023.2167966","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT While writing is undeniably an essential part of higher education, in music education, musical performance skills form the core of assessing students’ results. However, higher music education is experiencing growing demands on research activities parallel to heightened requirements on music performance students’ abilities to formulate themselves around their main field of study. This paper turns to theses as discursive acts embedded in higher music education. The present study investigates how master theses construct educational ideals by analysing written components of successfully completed theses within music performance programmes in Sweden. The paper shows that the theses treat a variety of subjects which are justified from five different perspectives: Improve, Succeed, Share, Acclaim or to Discover. Two diametrically opposed kinds of purpose statements are revealed; they appear as either impersonal and distanced or intimate and personal. Influences of traditional academic writing manifest themselves while conservatory ideals around craft, individualism and hierarchies are reproduced. It is argued that the self-exploratory approach – which is a characteristic feature on an overall level – excludes collective knowledge building as well as social perspectives on art and music.
瑞典音乐表演教育硕士论文的地位:主题、目的、理由
不可否认,写作是高等教育的重要组成部分,而在音乐教育中,音乐表演技能是评估学生成绩的核心。然而,高等音乐教育对研究活动的要求越来越高,同时对音乐表演学生围绕其主要研究领域形成自己的能力的要求也越来越高。本文将论文作为话语行为嵌入高等音乐教育。本研究通过分析瑞典音乐表演项目中成功完成的论文的书面组成部分,调查硕士论文如何构建教育理想。论文从改进、成功、分享、赞誉和发现五个不同的角度对各种主题进行了论证。揭示了两种截然相反的目的陈述;它们要么是非个人的、疏远的,要么是亲密的、个人化的。传统学术写作的影响体现在艺术、个人主义和等级观念的再现上。有人认为,自我探索的方法——这是一个整体层面上的特征——排除了集体知识的建立以及对艺术和音乐的社会观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
8.70%
发文量
50
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信