Students’ and teachers’ critical thinking in science education: are they related to each other and with physics achievement?

IF 1.8 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Xin Ma, Yin Zhang, Xingkai Luo
{"title":"Students’ and teachers’ critical thinking in science education: are they related to each other and with physics achievement?","authors":"Xin Ma, Yin Zhang, Xingkai Luo","doi":"10.1080/02635143.2021.1944078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Background Although there is an increasing recognition of the importance of critical thinking in science education across the world, the relevant research literature is extremely thin. There is an urgent need to generate more empirical evidence. Purpose We examined two essential issues concerning critical thinking (the relationship between students’ and teachers’ critical thinking as well as the relationship between critical thinking and science achievement) in the context of physics education. Sample We utilized data from the 2017 (Chinese) Program for Regional Assessment of Basic Education Quality with 46,820 students under 547 teachers from 128 schools. Design and methods We developed multiple membership multilevel models to account for students from different schools and under multiple teachers (in each school). Results After control over student, teacher, and school characteristics, although Chinese eighth graders demonstrated statistically significant critical thinking, there was not any statistically significant relationship between students’ and teachers’ critical thinking. With the same control, there was a statistically significant relationship between students’ critical thinking and students’ physics achievement among Chinese eighth graders. Meanwhile, there was not any statistically significant relationship between teachers’ critical thinking and students’ physics achievement (over and above the relationship between students’ critical thinking and students’ physics achievement). Conclusion We suggest that critical thinking may need to become an essential and explicit outcome of science education to help establish a relationship between students’ and teachers’ critical thinking and promote the correlation between critical thinking of students and teachers and students’ science achievement.","PeriodicalId":46656,"journal":{"name":"Research in Science & Technological Education","volume":"41 1","pages":"734 - 758"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/02635143.2021.1944078","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Science & Technological Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2021.1944078","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Although there is an increasing recognition of the importance of critical thinking in science education across the world, the relevant research literature is extremely thin. There is an urgent need to generate more empirical evidence. Purpose We examined two essential issues concerning critical thinking (the relationship between students’ and teachers’ critical thinking as well as the relationship between critical thinking and science achievement) in the context of physics education. Sample We utilized data from the 2017 (Chinese) Program for Regional Assessment of Basic Education Quality with 46,820 students under 547 teachers from 128 schools. Design and methods We developed multiple membership multilevel models to account for students from different schools and under multiple teachers (in each school). Results After control over student, teacher, and school characteristics, although Chinese eighth graders demonstrated statistically significant critical thinking, there was not any statistically significant relationship between students’ and teachers’ critical thinking. With the same control, there was a statistically significant relationship between students’ critical thinking and students’ physics achievement among Chinese eighth graders. Meanwhile, there was not any statistically significant relationship between teachers’ critical thinking and students’ physics achievement (over and above the relationship between students’ critical thinking and students’ physics achievement). Conclusion We suggest that critical thinking may need to become an essential and explicit outcome of science education to help establish a relationship between students’ and teachers’ critical thinking and promote the correlation between critical thinking of students and teachers and students’ science achievement.
科学教育中学生与教师的批判性思维:两者是否相互关联,是否与物理成绩相关?
虽然世界各地越来越认识到批判性思维在科学教育中的重要性,但相关的研究文献却非常少。迫切需要产生更多的经验证据。目的探讨在物理教育背景下批判性思维的两个基本问题(学生与教师的批判性思维以及批判性思维与科学成就的关系)。我们使用来自2017年(中文)基础教育质量区域评估项目的数据,来自128所学校的547名教师和46820名学生。设计和方法我们开发了多成员多级模型,以考虑来自不同学校和多名教师(每个学校)的学生。结果在对学生、教师和学校特征进行控制后,尽管中国八年级学生的批判性思维在统计学上显著,但学生和教师的批判性思维之间没有统计学上显著的关系。在相同的控制下,中国八年级学生的批判性思维与学生物理成绩之间存在显著的统计学关系。同时,教师的批判性思维与学生的物理成绩之间没有统计学上的显著关系(高于学生的批判性思维与学生的物理成绩之间的关系)。结论我们认为,批判性思维可能需要成为科学教育的一个基本和明确的结果,以帮助建立学生和教师的批判性思维之间的关系,促进学生和教师的批判性思维与学生的科学成就之间的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Research in Science & Technological Education
Research in Science & Technological Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
39
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信