Examining the Use of Video Analysis on Teacher Instruction and Teacher Outcomes

IF 1.4 4区教育学 Q3 EDUCATION, SPECIAL

Journal of Special Education Pub Date : 2022-11-24 DOI:10.1177/00224669221133773

McKenzie Meline, Beth A. Harn, Elisa M. Jamgochian, M. K. Stickland-Cohen, Sylvia Linan-Thompson, Audrey Lucero

{"title":"Examining the Use of Video Analysis on Teacher Instruction and Teacher Outcomes","authors":"McKenzie Meline, Beth A. Harn, Elisa M. Jamgochian, M. K. Stickland-Cohen, Sylvia Linan-Thompson, Audrey Lucero","doi":"10.1177/00224669221133773","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this meta-analysis was to examine the literature base of single-case research design studies using video analysis to determine its effectiveness on teacher outcomes. Primary, ancestral, citation, and first author searches identified 12,047 dissertations and peer-reviewed articles published from 2010 to 2020. Each study (n = 24) was scored on its adherence to the What Works Clearinghouse design quality standards. A total of 16 articles were reviewed for statistical analysis, in which a between-case standardized mean difference was used to calculate effect sizes. Results indicate praise (n = 6; g = 2.66–0.37) and implementation (n = 6; g = 3.64–1.07) had effect sizes that continue to define video analysis as a promising practice. Recommendations for future practice include improving the methodological rigor of studies and increasing sample size to prove the generalizability of video analysis. Addressing these recommendations will support video analysis becoming an evidence-based practice (EBP) for educator development.","PeriodicalId":47783,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Special Education","volume":"57 1","pages":"83 - 93"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Special Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00224669221133773","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Abstract

The purpose of this meta-analysis was to examine the literature base of single-case research design studies using video analysis to determine its effectiveness on teacher outcomes. Primary, ancestral, citation, and first author searches identified 12,047 dissertations and peer-reviewed articles published from 2010 to 2020. Each study (n = 24) was scored on its adherence to the What Works Clearinghouse design quality standards. A total of 16 articles were reviewed for statistical analysis, in which a between-case standardized mean difference was used to calculate effect sizes. Results indicate praise (n = 6; g = 2.66–0.37) and implementation (n = 6; g = 3.64–1.07) had effect sizes that continue to define video analysis as a promising practice. Recommendations for future practice include improving the methodological rigor of studies and increasing sample size to prove the generalizability of video analysis. Addressing these recommendations will support video analysis becoming an evidence-based practice (EBP) for educator development.

查看原文本刊更多论文

考察视频分析在教师教学和教师成果中的应用

本荟萃分析的目的是使用视频分析检查单例研究设计研究的文献基础，以确定其对教师成果的有效性。主要、祖先、引用和第一作者搜索确定了2010年至2020年发表的12047篇论文和同行评议文章。每个研究(n = 24)根据其对What Works Clearinghouse设计质量标准的遵守程度进行评分。共回顾了16篇文章进行统计分析，其中使用病例间标准化平均差来计算效应量。结果表明表扬(n = 6;G = 2.66-0.37)和执行情况(n = 6;G = 3.64-1.07)的效应值继续将视频分析定义为一种有前途的实践。对未来实践的建议包括改进研究方法的严谨性和增加样本量以证明视频分析的普遍性。解决这些建议将支持视频分析成为教育工作者发展的循证实践(EBP)。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Special Education EDUCATION, SPECIAL-

CiteScore

4.30

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Journal of Special Education (JSE) is a multidisciplinary publication presenting primary research and scholarly reviews related to special education. The goal of this journal is to add to current scholarship and provide a sense of emerging directions in the field. Manuscripts initially are screened for (a) appropriateness of content for JSE, (b) adherence to guidelines specified in the APA publication manual, (c) readability of text, and (d) explicit statement of implications for the practice of special education.