Dissociable impairments of verbal learning differentiate childhood risk profiles for schizophrenia

IF 2.3 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Emma J. Carpendale , Alexis E. Cullen , Hannah Dickson , Kristin R. Laurens
{"title":"Dissociable impairments of verbal learning differentiate childhood risk profiles for schizophrenia","authors":"Emma J. Carpendale ,&nbsp;Alexis E. Cullen ,&nbsp;Hannah Dickson ,&nbsp;Kristin R. Laurens","doi":"10.1016/j.scog.2022.100239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Poor verbal learning and memory function is well-documented among individuals with schizophrenia and those at clinical high-risk for psychosis. This study aimed to identify these impairments among children aged 9–12 years with different schizophrenia risk profiles (family history or antecedents of schizophrenia, each of higher<sup>[H]</sup> or lower<sup>[L]</sup> risk load) relative to typically developing peers. These three groups were recruited via community-screening, and differentiated for analysis into: typically developing children (TD = 45); children who had 1 first- or ≥2 second-degree affected relatives (FHx<sup>H</sup> = 16) or one second-degree relative (FHx<sup>L</sup> = 15); and children presenting multiple replicated antecedents of schizophrenia whose clinical symptoms persisted at 2- and/or 4-year follow-up (ASz<sup>H</sup> = 16) or remitted during follow-up (ASz<sup>L</sup> = 16). Verbal learning/memory measures assessed at baseline (age 9–12 years) included: (i) total recall; (ii) trial 1 recall; (iii) learning score; (iv) intrusions; (v) total words lost; and (vi) serial position patterns. Analyses of variance indicated that FHx<sup>H</sup> and ASz<sup>H</sup> youth demonstrated impaired total recall compared to TD and ASz<sup>L</sup> children and lost significantly more words between trials than TD and FHx<sup>L</sup> children. Learning score was impaired among both FHx<sup>H</sup> and FHx<sup>L</sup> relative to TD and ASz<sup>L</sup> children. Thus, among putatively at-risk children, total words recalled and lost distinguished those with higher risk load (by family history or persistent antecedent symptomology), whereas learning score indexed familial vulnerability. Follow-up of the sample is needed to determine the capacity of verbal learning deficits to predict later illness and provide a potential avenue for early remediation to improve clinical or functional outcomes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38119,"journal":{"name":"Schizophrenia Research-Cognition","volume":"28 ","pages":"Article 100239"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221500132200004X/pdfft?md5=3af2156704bcee4fcee81e79ad395d55&pid=1-s2.0-S221500132200004X-main.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Schizophrenia Research-Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221500132200004X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Poor verbal learning and memory function is well-documented among individuals with schizophrenia and those at clinical high-risk for psychosis. This study aimed to identify these impairments among children aged 9–12 years with different schizophrenia risk profiles (family history or antecedents of schizophrenia, each of higher[H] or lower[L] risk load) relative to typically developing peers. These three groups were recruited via community-screening, and differentiated for analysis into: typically developing children (TD = 45); children who had 1 first- or ≥2 second-degree affected relatives (FHxH = 16) or one second-degree relative (FHxL = 15); and children presenting multiple replicated antecedents of schizophrenia whose clinical symptoms persisted at 2- and/or 4-year follow-up (ASzH = 16) or remitted during follow-up (ASzL = 16). Verbal learning/memory measures assessed at baseline (age 9–12 years) included: (i) total recall; (ii) trial 1 recall; (iii) learning score; (iv) intrusions; (v) total words lost; and (vi) serial position patterns. Analyses of variance indicated that FHxH and ASzH youth demonstrated impaired total recall compared to TD and ASzL children and lost significantly more words between trials than TD and FHxL children. Learning score was impaired among both FHxH and FHxL relative to TD and ASzL children. Thus, among putatively at-risk children, total words recalled and lost distinguished those with higher risk load (by family history or persistent antecedent symptomology), whereas learning score indexed familial vulnerability. Follow-up of the sample is needed to determine the capacity of verbal learning deficits to predict later illness and provide a potential avenue for early remediation to improve clinical or functional outcomes.

言语学习的可分离性损伤区分儿童精神分裂症的风险概况
不良的语言学习和记忆功能在精神分裂症患者和临床精神病高危人群中是有充分证据的。本研究旨在确定具有不同精神分裂症风险概况的9-12岁儿童(精神分裂症家族史或既往病史,每一个风险负荷都比正常发育的同龄人高[H]或低[L])的这些障碍。这三组是通过社区筛查招募的,并被区分为:典型发育儿童(TD = 45);有1个或≥2个二级亲属(FHxH = 16)或1个二级亲属(FHxL = 15)的儿童;出现多个重复的精神分裂症前因的儿童,其临床症状在2年和/或4年随访期间持续存在(ASzH = 16)或在随访期间缓解(ASzL = 16)。在基线(9-12岁)评估的言语学习/记忆测量包括:(i)总回忆;(二)一审召回;(三)学习成绩;(四)入侵;(五)丢失字数总数;(六)序列位置模式。方差分析表明,与TD和ASzL儿童相比,FHxH和ASzH青年表现出总体记忆受损,并且在试验之间比TD和FHxL儿童丢失了更多的单词。与TD和ASzL儿童相比,FHxH和FHxL儿童的学习成绩均有所下降。因此,在假定有风险的儿童中,总单词回忆和丢失区分了那些具有较高风险负荷的儿童(通过家族史或持续的先前症状),而学习分数则反映了家庭脆弱性。需要对样本进行随访,以确定言语学习缺陷的能力,以预测以后的疾病,并为早期补救提供潜在的途径,以改善临床或功能结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
10.70%
发文量
54
审稿时长
67 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信