Guest editorial “Knowledge management systems in the digital age”

IF 3.2 4区 管理学 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
D. Carlucci, D. Kudryavtsev, C. Bratianu
{"title":"Guest editorial “Knowledge management systems in the digital age”","authors":"D. Carlucci, D. Kudryavtsev, C. Bratianu","doi":"10.1080/14778238.2022.2129495","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research and practice have long acknowledged the importance of managing knowledge as a strategic source for organisational growth, competitiveness, sustainability, and innovation (e.g., Boisot, 1998; Bolisani & Bratianu, 2018; Carayannis et al., 2021; Carlucci & Schiuma, 2007; Grant, 1996; Heisig et al., 2016; Holsapple, 2005; Nonaka & Takeuchi, 2019; Schiuma et al., 2012; Sirmon et al., 2011; Teece, 2007). In today’s digital age technological advances have further pushed the need for Knowledge Management (KM) to the forefront. Data “explosion” and the development of advanced technologies are changing the way organisations manage, combine and deploy data, information and knowledge, take strategic decisions, operate their business models, and drive value creation mechanisms to meet diversified stakeholders’ wants and needs (Gavrilova et al., 2017). Additionally, the recent fastpaced changes of socio-economic scenario are forcing organisations to ensure optimal utilisation of critical knowledge and search for more efficient and agile approaches to knowledge creation and management (Bratianu, 2020; Bratianu & Bejinaru, 2021). Thus, organisations are rethinking their ways of acquiring or generating new knowledge, applying current knowledge, retaining and storing existing knowledge, sharing and transferring knowledge, and handling obsolete or invalid knowledge. In other terms, they are rethinking their KM systems (KMSs) to face the pervasive digitalisation with its challenges and opportunities and to thrive in the VUCA world. KMS has been conceptualised in different ways over the years. KMS has been defined as a collection of techniques and strategies to analyse, organise, improve, distribute, maintain, and share knowledge and experience in an organisation (e.g., Massingham, 2014; Nainar, 2016; Singh, 2007). Focusing on the tacit or explicit nature of knowledge, KMS has been also described as a system that, through information technology, facilitates the capture, storage, search, transfer and reuse of tacit and explicit knowledge in an organisation and can aid an organisation to transform tacit knowledge into explicit knowledge (Alavi & Leidner, 2001; Wang et al., 2016). Recently, the inclusion of knowledge and KMS within the released ISO 9001 and ISO 30401 (International Standards Organization (ISO), 2015; International Standards Organization (ISO), 2018), has marked a further change for KMS and has provided a long-awaited level of legitimacy also for this management system (Kudryavtsev and Sadykova, 2019; Pawlowsky et al., 2021). According to ISO 30401 (International Standards Organization (ISO), 2018) the purpose of this standard for KM is to support organisations to develop a KMS that effectively promotes and enables value-creation through knowledge. For this reason, an organisation shall establish, implement, maintain, and continually improve a KMS, which is understood as a part of a management system concerning knowledge, where system elements include the organisation’s KM culture, structure, governance and leadership, roles and responsibilities, planning, technology, processes and operation, etc. (International Standards Organization (ISO), 2018). Nowadays the development and exploitation of a well-thought KMS are essential to harness the real potential of the digital revolution and allow an organisation to have an integrated strategy and a holistic approach towards KM in the digital era. Moreover, because of the accelerating pace of change in competitive scenarios, organisations have to continuously rethink their KMS, in order to become more and more resilient and respond to unexpected challenges, by properly exploiting opportunities offered by digital technologies. This special issue aimed to attract rigorous research studies from scholars all over the world providing fresh insights about approaches, models, processes, and tools of KMSs for the timely and effective harnessing of the potential of such systems in the digital era. The papers of the special issue could not have been more diverse. This is clearly related to the far-reaching of ongoing various changes in the socio-economic scenario and the comprehensive role of digital technology in influencing and dealing with them. The studies reflect this variety and make the special issue particularly rich. Although the papers deal with many different specific issues and adopt different perspectives of analysis, the underlying theme is the role of KMS and digital technology in helping individuals and organisations survive, adapt to, or even take advantage of this new and more and more unpredictable digital age. The next section presents the synopsis of the papers included in this special issue.","PeriodicalId":51497,"journal":{"name":"Knowledge Management Research & Practice","volume":"20 1","pages":"793 - 796"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knowledge Management Research & Practice","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14778238.2022.2129495","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research and practice have long acknowledged the importance of managing knowledge as a strategic source for organisational growth, competitiveness, sustainability, and innovation (e.g., Boisot, 1998; Bolisani & Bratianu, 2018; Carayannis et al., 2021; Carlucci & Schiuma, 2007; Grant, 1996; Heisig et al., 2016; Holsapple, 2005; Nonaka & Takeuchi, 2019; Schiuma et al., 2012; Sirmon et al., 2011; Teece, 2007). In today’s digital age technological advances have further pushed the need for Knowledge Management (KM) to the forefront. Data “explosion” and the development of advanced technologies are changing the way organisations manage, combine and deploy data, information and knowledge, take strategic decisions, operate their business models, and drive value creation mechanisms to meet diversified stakeholders’ wants and needs (Gavrilova et al., 2017). Additionally, the recent fastpaced changes of socio-economic scenario are forcing organisations to ensure optimal utilisation of critical knowledge and search for more efficient and agile approaches to knowledge creation and management (Bratianu, 2020; Bratianu & Bejinaru, 2021). Thus, organisations are rethinking their ways of acquiring or generating new knowledge, applying current knowledge, retaining and storing existing knowledge, sharing and transferring knowledge, and handling obsolete or invalid knowledge. In other terms, they are rethinking their KM systems (KMSs) to face the pervasive digitalisation with its challenges and opportunities and to thrive in the VUCA world. KMS has been conceptualised in different ways over the years. KMS has been defined as a collection of techniques and strategies to analyse, organise, improve, distribute, maintain, and share knowledge and experience in an organisation (e.g., Massingham, 2014; Nainar, 2016; Singh, 2007). Focusing on the tacit or explicit nature of knowledge, KMS has been also described as a system that, through information technology, facilitates the capture, storage, search, transfer and reuse of tacit and explicit knowledge in an organisation and can aid an organisation to transform tacit knowledge into explicit knowledge (Alavi & Leidner, 2001; Wang et al., 2016). Recently, the inclusion of knowledge and KMS within the released ISO 9001 and ISO 30401 (International Standards Organization (ISO), 2015; International Standards Organization (ISO), 2018), has marked a further change for KMS and has provided a long-awaited level of legitimacy also for this management system (Kudryavtsev and Sadykova, 2019; Pawlowsky et al., 2021). According to ISO 30401 (International Standards Organization (ISO), 2018) the purpose of this standard for KM is to support organisations to develop a KMS that effectively promotes and enables value-creation through knowledge. For this reason, an organisation shall establish, implement, maintain, and continually improve a KMS, which is understood as a part of a management system concerning knowledge, where system elements include the organisation’s KM culture, structure, governance and leadership, roles and responsibilities, planning, technology, processes and operation, etc. (International Standards Organization (ISO), 2018). Nowadays the development and exploitation of a well-thought KMS are essential to harness the real potential of the digital revolution and allow an organisation to have an integrated strategy and a holistic approach towards KM in the digital era. Moreover, because of the accelerating pace of change in competitive scenarios, organisations have to continuously rethink their KMS, in order to become more and more resilient and respond to unexpected challenges, by properly exploiting opportunities offered by digital technologies. This special issue aimed to attract rigorous research studies from scholars all over the world providing fresh insights about approaches, models, processes, and tools of KMSs for the timely and effective harnessing of the potential of such systems in the digital era. The papers of the special issue could not have been more diverse. This is clearly related to the far-reaching of ongoing various changes in the socio-economic scenario and the comprehensive role of digital technology in influencing and dealing with them. The studies reflect this variety and make the special issue particularly rich. Although the papers deal with many different specific issues and adopt different perspectives of analysis, the underlying theme is the role of KMS and digital technology in helping individuals and organisations survive, adapt to, or even take advantage of this new and more and more unpredictable digital age. The next section presents the synopsis of the papers included in this special issue.
客座编辑“数字时代的知识管理系统”
长期以来,研究和实践都认识到管理知识作为组织成长、竞争力、可持续性的战略来源的重要性,和创新(例如,Boisot,1998;Bolisani和Bratianu,2018;Carayannis等人,2021;Carlucci和Schiuma,2007;Grant,1996;Heisig等人,2016;Holsapple,2005;野中和竹内,2019;Schiuma等人,2012;Sirmon等人,2011;Teece,2007)。在当今的数字时代,技术进步进一步将知识管理(KM)的需求推向了前沿。数据“爆炸”和先进技术的发展正在改变组织管理、组合和部署数据、信息和知识、做出战略决策、运营其商业模式以及推动价值创造机制的方式,以满足多元化利益相关者的愿望和需求(Gavrilova et al.,2017)。此外,最近社会经济形势的快速变化迫使组织确保关键知识的最佳利用,并寻求更高效、更敏捷的知识创造和管理方法(Bratianu,2020;Bratianu和Bejinaru,2021)。因此,组织正在重新思考获取或生成新知识、应用当前知识、保留和存储现有知识、共享和转移知识以及处理过时或无效知识的方式。换言之,他们正在重新思考他们的知识管理系统(KMS),以应对无处不在的数字化及其挑战和机遇,并在VUCA世界中蓬勃发展。多年来,KMS以不同的方式被概念化。KMS被定义为一组技术和战略,用于分析、组织、改进、分发、维护和分享组织中的知识和经验(例如,Massingham,2014;Nainar,2016;Singh,2007)。关注知识的隐性或显性本质,KMS也被描述为一种通过信息技术促进组织中隐性和显性知识的捕获、存储、搜索、转移和重用的系统,并可以帮助组织将隐性知识转化为显性知识(Alavi&Leidner,2001;王等人,2016)。最近,将知识和KMS纳入发布的ISO 9001和ISO 30401(国际标准化组织(ISO),2015;国际标准组织(ISO),2018)标志着KMS的进一步变革,并为该管理体系提供了期待已久的合法性水平(Kudryavtsev和Sadykova,2019;Pawlowsky等人,2021)。根据ISO 30401(国际标准化组织(ISO),2018),本KM标准的目的是支持组织开发KMS,通过知识有效促进和实现价值创造。因此,组织应建立、实施、维护和持续改进知识管理系统,该系统被理解为知识管理系统的一部分,其中系统元素包括组织的知识管理文化、结构、治理和领导、角色和责任、规划、技术、过程和运营,等(国际标准组织(ISO),2018)。如今,开发和利用一个经过深思熟虑的知识管理系统对于利用数字革命的真正潜力至关重要,并使一个组织能够在数字时代制定综合战略和全面的知识管理方法。此外,由于竞争场景的变化速度不断加快,组织必须不断反思其KMS,以便通过适当利用数字技术提供的机会,变得越来越有弹性,并应对意想不到的挑战。这期特刊旨在吸引世界各地学者的严谨研究,为KMS的方法、模型、过程和工具提供新的见解,以便在数字时代及时有效地利用此类系统的潜力。特刊的论文种类再丰富不过了。这显然与社会经济形势中正在发生的各种变化的深远影响以及数字技术在影响和应对这些变化方面的全面作用有关。这些研究反映了这种多样性,使特刊特别丰富。尽管这些论文涉及许多不同的具体问题,并采用了不同的分析视角,但其主题是KMS和数字技术在帮助个人和组织生存、适应甚至利用这个新的、越来越不可预测的数字时代方面的作用。下一节介绍本特刊所载论文的概要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
15.60%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: Knowledge management is a term that has worked its way into the mainstream of both academic and business arenas since it was first coined in the 1980s. Interest has increased rapidly during the last decade and shows no signs of abating. The current state of the knowledge management field is that it encompasses four overlapping areas: •Managing knowledge (creating/acquiring, sharing, retaining, storing, using, updating, retiring) •Organisational learning •Intellectual capital •Knowledge economics Within (and across) these, knowledge management has to address issues relating to technology, people, culture and systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信