A chronotype circadian model of charismatic leadership expressions and perceptions

IF 9.1 1区管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT

Leadership Quarterly Pub Date : 2021-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.leaqua.2021.101509

Cristiano L. Guarana , Christopher M. Barnes , Ji Woon Ryu , Rohan Crawley

{"title":"A chronotype circadian model of charismatic leadership expressions and perceptions","authors":"Cristiano L. Guarana , Christopher M. Barnes , Ji Woon Ryu , Rohan Crawley","doi":"10.1016/j.leaqua.2021.101509","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We investigate the impact of the circadian process (24-h biological cycles that influence sleep/wake periods) and chronotypes (individual differences in the timing of those cycles) in charismatic leadership. We theorize that the expressions of charismatic signals by leaders, and the perceptions of those signals by followers are influenced by the circadian process. Moreover, considering that individuals vary in their sleep awake preferences (larks vs. owls), we argue that chronotype interacts with time of day to influence expressions and perceptions of charismatic leadership. In Study 1, we found that synchrony between leader chronotype and time of day affects expressions of charismatic leadership. In Study 2, we turned our attention to the followers' circadian process and found that synchrony between a follower's chronotype and time of day affects follower's perceptions of charismatic leadership. Our new model highlights how charismatic leadership can be driven by circadian process.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48434,"journal":{"name":"Leadership Quarterly","volume":"32 6","pages":"Article 101509"},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.leaqua.2021.101509","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Leadership Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1048984321000151","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Abstract

We investigate the impact of the circadian process (24-h biological cycles that influence sleep/wake periods) and chronotypes (individual differences in the timing of those cycles) in charismatic leadership. We theorize that the expressions of charismatic signals by leaders, and the perceptions of those signals by followers are influenced by the circadian process. Moreover, considering that individuals vary in their sleep awake preferences (larks vs. owls), we argue that chronotype interacts with time of day to influence expressions and perceptions of charismatic leadership. In Study 1, we found that synchrony between leader chronotype and time of day affects expressions of charismatic leadership. In Study 2, we turned our attention to the followers' circadian process and found that synchrony between a follower's chronotype and time of day affects follower's perceptions of charismatic leadership. Our new model highlights how charismatic leadership can be driven by circadian process.

查看原文本刊更多论文

魅力型领导表达和感知的时间型昼夜节律模型

我们研究了昼夜节律过程(影响睡眠/觉醒时间的24小时生物周期)和时间类型(这些周期时间的个体差异)对魅力型领导的影响。我们认为领导者对魅力信号的表达以及追随者对这些信号的感知受到昼夜节律过程的影响。此外，考虑到个体在睡眠和清醒方面的偏好各不相同(云雀和猫头鹰)，我们认为生物钟与一天中的时间相互作用，影响对魅力型领导的表达和看法。在研究1中，我们发现领导者时型和时间的同步性影响魅力型领导的表达。在研究2中，我们将注意力转向追随者的昼夜节律过程，发现追随者的时间类型和一天中的时间之间的同步性影响追随者对魅力型领导的看法。我们的新模型强调了魅力型领导是如何受到昼夜节律过程的驱动的。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Leadership Quarterly Multiple-

CiteScore

15.20

自引率

9.30%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Leadership Quarterly is a social-science journal dedicated to advancing our understanding of leadership as a phenomenon, how to study it, as well as its practical implications. Leadership Quarterly seeks contributions from various disciplinary perspectives, including psychology broadly defined (i.e., industrial-organizational, social, evolutionary, biological, differential), management (i.e., organizational behavior, strategy, organizational theory), political science, sociology, economics (i.e., personnel, behavioral, labor), anthropology, history, and methodology.Equally desirable are contributions from multidisciplinary perspectives.