Varying the Number of FOP Warnings on Hedonic and Utilitarian Food Products: Evidence from Chile

IF 3.6 Q2 BUSINESS
R. Uribe, Enrique Manzur, C. Cornejo
{"title":"Varying the Number of FOP Warnings on Hedonic and Utilitarian Food Products: Evidence from Chile","authors":"R. Uribe, Enrique Manzur, C. Cornejo","doi":"10.1080/10454446.2020.1738971","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT FOP food-labeling systems seek to inform on a product`s healthy/unhealthy state and signal a product`s healthiness level. Research in this area has focused primarily on exploring the healthy/unhealthy dimension, leaving the effect of FOP schemes on the perception of healthiness under-researched. The objective of this study is to evaluate how an increase or decrease in the number of warning signs in the packaging of food products affects the healthiness perception of the consumer and the subsequent purchase intention. This examination is developed by comparing utilitarian and utilitarian food products as a means to examine whether FOP labeling effects are moderated by prior buying motivations. Results show that a different number of warnings is correctly perceived and used by consumers. Results also reveal that utilitarian products are more affected by the presence of one warning and in the case of these products these differences disappear when the number of warnings increases.","PeriodicalId":15827,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Food Products Marketing","volume":"26 1","pages":"123 - 143"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10454446.2020.1738971","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Food Products Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10454446.2020.1738971","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

ABSTRACT FOP food-labeling systems seek to inform on a product`s healthy/unhealthy state and signal a product`s healthiness level. Research in this area has focused primarily on exploring the healthy/unhealthy dimension, leaving the effect of FOP schemes on the perception of healthiness under-researched. The objective of this study is to evaluate how an increase or decrease in the number of warning signs in the packaging of food products affects the healthiness perception of the consumer and the subsequent purchase intention. This examination is developed by comparing utilitarian and utilitarian food products as a means to examine whether FOP labeling effects are moderated by prior buying motivations. Results show that a different number of warnings is correctly perceived and used by consumers. Results also reveal that utilitarian products are more affected by the presence of one warning and in the case of these products these differences disappear when the number of warnings increases.
享乐主义和功利主义食品的FOP警告数量的变化:来自智利的证据
FOP食品标签系统旨在告知产品的健康/不健康状态,并表明产品的健康水平。该领域的研究主要集中在探索健康/不健康维度,而FOP方案对健康感知的影响尚待研究。本研究的目的是评估食品包装中警告标志数量的增加或减少如何影响消费者的健康感知和随后的购买意愿。这项检验是通过比较实用性和实用性食品来进行的,以此来检验FOP标签效应是否受到先前购买动机的调节。结果表明,不同数量的警告被消费者正确感知和使用。结果还表明,实用产品更容易受到一个警告的影响,在这些产品的情况下,当警告数量增加时,这些差异就会消失。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
6.90%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: From food promotion and advertising through new food product development and consumer behavior research, the Journal of Food Products Marketing provides timely, practical articles that keep food marketers on the cutting edge of their profession. The journal includes refereed research studies as well as opinions, guidelines, and speeches by practitioners that contribute to the better practice and understanding of food marketing. The journal provides a single forum for both food marketing academicians and food marketing practitioners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信