The role of inflated responsibility beliefs in predicting symptoms of generalised anxiety disorder and depression

IF 3.6 4区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Simone Avard, David Garratt-Reed
{"title":"The role of inflated responsibility beliefs in predicting symptoms of generalised anxiety disorder and depression","authors":"Simone Avard, David Garratt-Reed","doi":"10.1080/00049530.2021.1882268","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Objective: Inflated responsibility beliefs encompass responsibility attitudes, the general tendency to accept responsibility, and responsibility interpretations, the appraisals of specific intrusive thoughts as indicating personal responsibility for harm. While inflated responsibility beliefs are central to obsessive-compulsive disorder, it is unclear whether they are also related to other disorder symptomology. Consequently, the current study investigated whether inflated responsibility beliefs predicted unique variance in symptoms of depression and generalised anxiety disorder in a non-clinical sample, after controlling for negative affect. Method: Participants were undergraduate psychology students and community members (N = 182, 43 males, 136 females, 3 non-binary), aged 18-70 years (M = 27.71, SD = 11.86) recruited through convenience and snowball sampling. A cross-sectional, correlational design was employed, whereby participants completed an online questionnaire. Data were analysed using two separate hierarchical multiple regression analyses, one with generalised anxiety disorder symptoms as the criterion and one with depression symptoms as the criterion. Results: After controlling for negative affect and age, an increase in responsibility attitudes uniquely predicted a significant small increase in generalised anxiety disorder symptoms, sr 2 = .03, 95% CI [.02, .08], p < .001, but not depression symptoms. Responsibility interpretations did not predict significant unique variance in depression or generalised anxiety disorder symptoms. Conclusions: Results suggest responsibility attitudes relate to symptoms of some disorders (i.e., generalised anxiety disorder), but not all psychopathology (i.e., depression). Responsibility attitudes should potentially be considered in aetiological models of generalised anxiety disorder. Results suggest responsibility interpretations are not transdiagnostic, although measurement difficulties render this unclear. KEY POINTS What is already known about this topic: Inflated responsibility beliefs were first discussed in relation to obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and have since been established as central to OCD symptomology. However, it remains unclear whether inflated responsibility beliefs are specific to OCD or represent a general cognitive bias, due to inconsistent study methodology and findings. While reasonably strong evidence exists to suggest that inflated responsibility beliefs may be associated with symptoms of generalised anxiety disorder, these studies have used problematic measures. Limited research has examined the association between inflated responsibility beliefs and depression symptoms, and available research has produced conflicting findings. What this topic adds: The current study is the first to examine responsibility beliefs in relation to symptoms of depression and generalised anxiety disorder using the Responsibility Attitudes Scale/Responsibility Interpretations Questionnaire. Increased responsibility attitudes predicted increased generalised anxiety disorder symptoms but did not predict variance in depression symptoms in the current non-clinical sample. Responsibility interpretations did not predict variance in generalised anxiety disorder symptoms or depression symptoms in the current sample. Findings suggest responsibility attitudes may be somewhat transdiagnostic, evident in some disorders (e.g., generalised anxiety disorder) but not all disorders (e.g., depression). Findings are broadly consistent with the idea that responsibility interpretations might be specific to OCD (although this was not assessed directly in the current study).","PeriodicalId":8871,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00049530.2021.1882268","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00049530.2021.1882268","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective: Inflated responsibility beliefs encompass responsibility attitudes, the general tendency to accept responsibility, and responsibility interpretations, the appraisals of specific intrusive thoughts as indicating personal responsibility for harm. While inflated responsibility beliefs are central to obsessive-compulsive disorder, it is unclear whether they are also related to other disorder symptomology. Consequently, the current study investigated whether inflated responsibility beliefs predicted unique variance in symptoms of depression and generalised anxiety disorder in a non-clinical sample, after controlling for negative affect. Method: Participants were undergraduate psychology students and community members (N = 182, 43 males, 136 females, 3 non-binary), aged 18-70 years (M = 27.71, SD = 11.86) recruited through convenience and snowball sampling. A cross-sectional, correlational design was employed, whereby participants completed an online questionnaire. Data were analysed using two separate hierarchical multiple regression analyses, one with generalised anxiety disorder symptoms as the criterion and one with depression symptoms as the criterion. Results: After controlling for negative affect and age, an increase in responsibility attitudes uniquely predicted a significant small increase in generalised anxiety disorder symptoms, sr 2 = .03, 95% CI [.02, .08], p < .001, but not depression symptoms. Responsibility interpretations did not predict significant unique variance in depression or generalised anxiety disorder symptoms. Conclusions: Results suggest responsibility attitudes relate to symptoms of some disorders (i.e., generalised anxiety disorder), but not all psychopathology (i.e., depression). Responsibility attitudes should potentially be considered in aetiological models of generalised anxiety disorder. Results suggest responsibility interpretations are not transdiagnostic, although measurement difficulties render this unclear. KEY POINTS What is already known about this topic: Inflated responsibility beliefs were first discussed in relation to obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and have since been established as central to OCD symptomology. However, it remains unclear whether inflated responsibility beliefs are specific to OCD or represent a general cognitive bias, due to inconsistent study methodology and findings. While reasonably strong evidence exists to suggest that inflated responsibility beliefs may be associated with symptoms of generalised anxiety disorder, these studies have used problematic measures. Limited research has examined the association between inflated responsibility beliefs and depression symptoms, and available research has produced conflicting findings. What this topic adds: The current study is the first to examine responsibility beliefs in relation to symptoms of depression and generalised anxiety disorder using the Responsibility Attitudes Scale/Responsibility Interpretations Questionnaire. Increased responsibility attitudes predicted increased generalised anxiety disorder symptoms but did not predict variance in depression symptoms in the current non-clinical sample. Responsibility interpretations did not predict variance in generalised anxiety disorder symptoms or depression symptoms in the current sample. Findings suggest responsibility attitudes may be somewhat transdiagnostic, evident in some disorders (e.g., generalised anxiety disorder) but not all disorders (e.g., depression). Findings are broadly consistent with the idea that responsibility interpretations might be specific to OCD (although this was not assessed directly in the current study).
夸大的责任信念在预测广泛性焦虑症和抑郁症症状中的作用
摘要目的:夸大的责任信念包括责任态度、接受责任的普遍倾向和责任解释,即对特定侵入性思想的评价,表明个人对伤害负有责任。虽然夸大的责任信念是强迫症的核心,但尚不清楚它们是否也与其他强迫症症状有关。因此,目前的研究调查了在控制负面影响后,膨胀的责任信念是否预测了非临床样本中抑郁症和广泛性焦虑症症状的独特差异。方法:参与者为心理学本科生和社区成员(N=182,43名男性,136名女性,3名非二进制),年龄18-70岁(M=27.71,SD=11.86)。采用横断面相关设计,参与者完成在线问卷调查。数据采用两种独立的分层多元回归分析进行分析,一种以广泛性焦虑症症状为标准,另一种以抑郁症状为标准。结果:在控制了负面情绪和年龄后,责任态度的增加唯一地预测了广泛性焦虑症症状的显著小幅增加,sr2=.03,95%CI[.02,.08],p<.001,但不是抑郁症状。责任解释不能预测抑郁症或广泛性焦虑症症状的显著独特差异。结论:研究结果表明,责任态度与某些疾病(即广泛性焦虑症)的症状有关,但并非所有精神病理学(即抑郁症)都有关系。在广泛性焦虑症的病因模型中,应潜在地考虑责任态度。结果表明,责任解释不是跨诊断的,尽管测量困难使其不清楚。关键点关于这个话题已经知道的内容:膨胀的责任信念最初被讨论与强迫症(OCD)有关,后来被确立为强迫症症状学的核心。然而,由于研究方法和结果不一致,目前尚不清楚夸大的责任信念是强迫症特有的,还是代表了普遍的认知偏见。虽然有相当有力的证据表明,夸大的责任信念可能与广泛性焦虑症的症状有关,但这些研究使用了有问题的测量方法。有限的研究考察了夸大的责任信念和抑郁症状之间的联系,现有的研究产生了相互矛盾的结果。本主题补充道:本研究首次使用责任态度量表/责任解释问卷调查了责任信念与抑郁症和广泛性焦虑症症状的关系。在当前的非临床样本中,责任态度的增加预测了广泛性焦虑症症状的增加,但没有预测抑郁症状的变化。责任解释无法预测当前样本中普遍性焦虑症症状或抑郁症状的差异。研究结果表明,责任态度可能在某种程度上是跨诊断的,在某些疾病(如广泛性焦虑症)中很明显,但并非所有疾病(如抑郁症)都很明显。研究结果与责任解释可能是强迫症特有的观点大致一致(尽管目前的研究没有直接评估这一点)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Australian Journal of Psychology
Australian Journal of Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: Australian Journal of Psychology is the premier scientific journal of the Australian Psychological Society. It covers the entire spectrum of psychological research and receives articles on all topics within the broad scope of the discipline. The journal publishes high quality peer-reviewed articles with reviewers and associate editors providing detailed assistance to authors to reach publication. The journal publishes reports of experimental and survey studies, including reports of qualitative investigations, on pure and applied topics in the field of psychology. Articles on clinical psychology or on the professional concerns of applied psychology should be submitted to our sister journals, Australian Psychologist or Clinical Psychologist. The journal publishes occasional reviews of specific topics, theoretical pieces and commentaries on methodological issues. There are also solicited book reviews and comments Annual special issues devoted to a single topic, and guest edited by a specialist editor, are published. The journal regards itself as international in vision and will accept submissions from psychologists in all countries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信