Occupational self-efficacy and work engagement as moderators in the stressor-detachment model

IF 5.6 2区心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED

Work and Stress Pub Date : 2020-03-31 DOI:10.1080/02678373.2020.1743790

Elisa Clauss, A. Hoppe, Vivian Schachler, Deirdre O’Shea

{"title":"Occupational self-efficacy and work engagement as moderators in the stressor-detachment model","authors":"Elisa Clauss, A. Hoppe, Vivian Schachler, Deirdre O’Shea","doi":"10.1080/02678373.2020.1743790","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Psychological detachment from work is crucial for employees to replenish resources and maintain well-being. In this study, we tested the stressor detachment model (Sonnentag & Fritz, 2015. Recovery from job stress: The stressor-detachment model as an integrative framework. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(S1), S72–S103. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1924) by examining the mediation of psychological detachment between workload and emotional exhaustion. Furthermore, we investigated work engagement and occupational self-efficacy as moderators in the stressor-detachment model Our study comprised a 3-wave lagged design with 257 participants with flexible working hours. The results show that psychological detachment mediated the workload-exhaustion relationship and that work engagement buffered the negative effect of workload on psychological detachment. We found no moderated mediation for occupational self-efficacy; however, occupational self-efficacy significantly predicted psychological detachment. Our findings suggest that research should conceive a broader stressor-detachment model that considers different paths (i.e. moderators, mediators, and predictors). Moreover, organisations should support engagement and resource replenishment to ensure detachment from work.","PeriodicalId":48199,"journal":{"name":"Work and Stress","volume":"35 1","pages":"74 - 92"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/02678373.2020.1743790","citationCount":"21","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Work and Stress","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2020.1743790","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 21

Abstract

ABSTRACT Psychological detachment from work is crucial for employees to replenish resources and maintain well-being. In this study, we tested the stressor detachment model (Sonnentag & Fritz, 2015. Recovery from job stress: The stressor-detachment model as an integrative framework. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(S1), S72–S103. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1924) by examining the mediation of psychological detachment between workload and emotional exhaustion. Furthermore, we investigated work engagement and occupational self-efficacy as moderators in the stressor-detachment model Our study comprised a 3-wave lagged design with 257 participants with flexible working hours. The results show that psychological detachment mediated the workload-exhaustion relationship and that work engagement buffered the negative effect of workload on psychological detachment. We found no moderated mediation for occupational self-efficacy; however, occupational self-efficacy significantly predicted psychological detachment. Our findings suggest that research should conceive a broader stressor-detachment model that considers different paths (i.e. moderators, mediators, and predictors). Moreover, organisations should support engagement and resource replenishment to ensure detachment from work.

查看原文本刊更多论文

职业自我效能感和工作投入在压力源-脱离模型中的调节作用

摘要：脱离工作的心理对于员工补充资源和保持健康至关重要。在这项研究中，我们测试了压力源分离模型（Sonnentag&Fritz，2015。从工作压力中恢复：压力源分离模型作为一个综合框架。组织行为杂志，36（S1），S72–S103。https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1924)通过考察工作量和情绪衰竭之间的心理脱离的中介作用。此外，我们在压力源分离模型中调查了作为调节因素的工作投入和职业自我效能感。我们的研究包括一个3波滞后设计，257名参与者具有灵活的工作时间。结果表明，心理超脱介导了工作量耗竭关系，工作投入缓冲了工作量对心理超脱的负面影响。我们没有发现职业自我效能的调节中介；然而，职业自我效能感对心理脱离有显著的预测作用。我们的研究结果表明，研究应该构思一个更广泛的压力源分离模型，考虑不同的路径（即调节因子、中介因子和预测因子）。此外，组织应支持参与和资源补充，以确保脱离工作。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Work and Stress PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED-

CiteScore

11.70

自引率

3.30%

发文量

期刊介绍： Work & Stress is an international, multidisciplinary quarterly presenting high-quality papers concerned with the psychological, social and organizational aspects of occupational health and well-being, and stress and safety management. It is published in association with the European Academy of Occupational Health Psychology. The journal publishes empirical reports, scholarly reviews and theoretical papers. It is directed at occupational health psychologists, work and organizational psychologists, those involved with organizational development, and all concerned with the interplay of work, health and organisations. Research published in Work & Stress relates psychologically salient features of the work environment to their psychological, behavioural and health consequences, focusing on the underlying psychological processes. The journal has become a natural home for research on the work-family interface, social relations at work (including topics such as bullying and conflict at work, leadership and organizational support), workplace interventions and reorganizations, and dimensions and outcomes of worker stress and well-being. Such dimensions and outcomes, both positive and negative, include stress, burnout, sickness absence, work motivation, work engagement and work performance. Of course, submissions addressing other topics in occupational health psychology are also welcomed.