Journalism Education in India: The Widening Gap Between Research and Practice

Q2 Social Sciences

Asia Pacific Media Educator Pub Date : 2020-11-25 DOI:10.1177/1326365X20970419

Aditya Sinha, D. Basu

引用次数: 1

Abstract

This article is based on reviews of studies in the field of journalism education in India after the proliferation of the Internet, particularly after the year 2010. The journalism practices have undergone a significant change in the past two decades, with the enabling of new information technologies, resulting in increased feedback from the audiences as well as globalized education opportunities for the content creators. The article is based on the content analysis, using grounded theory as the qualitative research method, to identify various themes in journalism researches, from Indian universities during the same period. The implications of the results suggest that there is a wide gap between the research conducted in the educational institutions and the prevailing pattern in the journalism industry in the country.

查看原文本刊更多论文

印度新闻教育:研究与实践之间日益扩大的差距

这篇文章是基于对印度新闻教育领域研究的回顾，在互联网普及之后，特别是在2010年之后。在过去的二十年中，随着新的信息技术的出现，新闻实践发生了重大变化，受众的反馈增加了，内容创作者也有了全球化的教育机会。本文以内容分析为基础，运用扎根理论作为定性研究方法，对同一时期印度大学新闻学研究的不同主题进行梳理。结果表明，在教育机构进行的研究与该国新闻业的普遍模式之间存在很大差距。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Asia Pacific Media Educator COMMUNICATION-

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Asia Pacific Media Educator is an international refereed journal published twice a year by SAGE Publications (New Delhi) in collaboration with the School of the Arts, English and Media, Faculty of Law, Humanities and the Arts, University of Wollongong in Australia. The journal follows international norms and procedures of blind peer reviewing by scholars representing a wide range of multi-disciplinary areas. APME focuses on generating discussions and dialogues among media educators, researchers and journalists. Content ranges from critical commentaries and essays to research reports and papers that contribute to journalism theory development and offer innovative ideas in improving the standard and currency of media reportage, teaching and training specific to the Asia Pacific region. Papers that integrate media theories with applications to professional practice, media training and journalism education are usually selected for peer review. APME also carries a Q&A section with book authors. APME takes conventional book reviews to a more creative level where reviewers directly engage with authors to understand the process that authors take in researching and writing the book, clarify their assumptions and pose critical questions.