Institutionalized Education: Journalism and Mass Communication Education in Pakistan

Q2 Social Sciences

Asia Pacific Media Educator Pub Date : 2021-06-01 DOI:10.1177/1326365x211009631

David Bockino, A. Ilyas

引用次数: 1

Abstract

This article uses an examination of journalism and mass communication (JMC) education in Pakistan as a case study to explore the consequences of increased homogenization of JMC education around the world. Anchored by a qualitative method that relies heavily on actor-network theory, the study identifies key moments and people in the trajectory of five Pakistani programmes and explores the connection between these programmes and the larger JMC organizational field. The study concludes by questioning the efficacy of the current power structures within the supranational JMC organizational field before discussing how these influences could potentially be mitigated moving forward.

查看原文本刊更多论文

制度化的教育:巴基斯坦的新闻与大众传播教育

本文以巴基斯坦新闻与大众传播(JMC)教育为例，探讨世界各地新闻与大众传播教育日益同质化的后果。该研究以一种严重依赖行动者网络理论的定性方法为基础，确定了五个巴基斯坦项目轨迹中的关键时刻和关键人物，并探讨了这些项目与更大的JMC组织领域之间的联系。在讨论如何潜在地减轻这些影响之前，该研究通过质疑超国家JMC组织领域内当前权力结构的有效性来结束。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Asia Pacific Media Educator COMMUNICATION-

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Asia Pacific Media Educator is an international refereed journal published twice a year by SAGE Publications (New Delhi) in collaboration with the School of the Arts, English and Media, Faculty of Law, Humanities and the Arts, University of Wollongong in Australia. The journal follows international norms and procedures of blind peer reviewing by scholars representing a wide range of multi-disciplinary areas. APME focuses on generating discussions and dialogues among media educators, researchers and journalists. Content ranges from critical commentaries and essays to research reports and papers that contribute to journalism theory development and offer innovative ideas in improving the standard and currency of media reportage, teaching and training specific to the Asia Pacific region. Papers that integrate media theories with applications to professional practice, media training and journalism education are usually selected for peer review. APME also carries a Q&A section with book authors. APME takes conventional book reviews to a more creative level where reviewers directly engage with authors to understand the process that authors take in researching and writing the book, clarify their assumptions and pose critical questions.