Amy C. Crosson, Pui‐wa Lei, Weiyi Cheng, Margaret G. McKeown
{"title":"The Curious Role of Morphological Family Size in Language Minority Learners’ Problem Solving of Unfamiliar Words","authors":"Amy C. Crosson, Pui‐wa Lei, Weiyi Cheng, Margaret G. McKeown","doi":"10.1080/10888438.2019.1701475","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Given that words from the academic layer of English typically carry bound roots (min in diminish) rather than free-standing base words (small in smaller), there is a need to understand the factors that make bound roots more or less accessible for morphological problem-solving unfamiliar words. We investigated the contributions of learner characteristics and morpheme/word characteristics to the morphological problem-solving skill of 87 language minority learners. Participants analyzed 18 morphologically complex, unfamiliar words on a Morphological Analysis Task. Among learner characteristics, results from multilevel logistic models indicated that only English proficiency predicted difficulty. For root characteristics, semantic opaqueness, phonological shift, and orthographic neighborhood size predicted difficulty as expected. Morphological family size also predicted difficulty, but in unexpected ways, with larger family size predicting greater difficulty. Exploratory analyses suggested that family size may interact with other root characteristics to further influence difficulty. Findings hold implications for models of morphological processing and literacy intervention design.","PeriodicalId":48032,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Studies of Reading","volume":"24 1","pages":"445 - 461"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10888438.2019.1701475","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Studies of Reading","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2019.1701475","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
ABSTRACT Given that words from the academic layer of English typically carry bound roots (min in diminish) rather than free-standing base words (small in smaller), there is a need to understand the factors that make bound roots more or less accessible for morphological problem-solving unfamiliar words. We investigated the contributions of learner characteristics and morpheme/word characteristics to the morphological problem-solving skill of 87 language minority learners. Participants analyzed 18 morphologically complex, unfamiliar words on a Morphological Analysis Task. Among learner characteristics, results from multilevel logistic models indicated that only English proficiency predicted difficulty. For root characteristics, semantic opaqueness, phonological shift, and orthographic neighborhood size predicted difficulty as expected. Morphological family size also predicted difficulty, but in unexpected ways, with larger family size predicting greater difficulty. Exploratory analyses suggested that family size may interact with other root characteristics to further influence difficulty. Findings hold implications for models of morphological processing and literacy intervention design.
考虑到来自英语学术层的单词通常带有束缚词根(min in reduce),而不是独立的基词(small in small),有必要了解使束缚词根或多或少地被用于解决形态学问题的陌生单词的因素。本文研究了学习者特征和语素/词特征对87名少数民族语言学习者词素问题解决能力的影响。参与者在形态学分析任务中分析了18个形态学复杂、不熟悉的单词。在学习者特征中,多层逻辑模型的结果显示,只有英语熟练程度可以预测难度。对于词根特征,语义不透明,音位移位和正字法邻域大小预测了预期的难度。形态学家族的大小也能预测难度,但以意想不到的方式,更大的家族规模预测更大的难度。探索性分析表明,家庭规模可能与其他根特征相互作用,进一步影响难度。研究结果对形态学处理模型和识字干预设计具有启示意义。
期刊介绍:
This journal publishes original empirical investigations dealing with all aspects of reading and its related areas, and, occasionally, scholarly reviews of the literature, papers focused on theory development, and discussions of social policy issues. Papers range from very basic studies to those whose main thrust is toward educational practice. The journal also includes work on "all aspects of reading and its related areas," a phrase that is sufficiently general to encompass issues related to word recognition, comprehension, writing, intervention, and assessment involving very young children and/or adults.