Gain and loss spirals: Reciprocal relationships between resources and job insecurity

IF 4.9 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT
Lixin Jiang, Xiaohong Xu, Elena Zubielevitch, Chris G. Sibley
{"title":"Gain and loss spirals: Reciprocal relationships between resources and job insecurity","authors":"Lixin Jiang,&nbsp;Xiaohong Xu,&nbsp;Elena Zubielevitch,&nbsp;Chris G. Sibley","doi":"10.1111/joop.12440","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Based on gain and loss spiral principles from Conservation of Resources (COR) theory, we examined change-related reciprocal relations between three key resources (i.e. self-esteem, sense of belonging and perceived social support) and job insecurity. We adopted a latent change score (LCS) approach and examined the loss and gain spirals with a seven-wave longitudinal dataset from the New Zealand Attitudes and Values Study (<i>N</i> = 6518). The LCS models indicated that: (1) self-esteem predicts decreased job insecurity, but not vice versa, (2) sense of belonging predicts decreased job insecurity, but not vice versa and (3) there is a change-related reciprocal relationship between perceived social support and job insecurity. Inconsistent with the primacy of resource loss proposed by COR theory, we also confirm that the effects of self-esteem, sense of belonging and perceived social support on changes in job insecurity (i.e., gain spirals) are stronger than the effects of job insecurity on changes in these three resources (i.e., loss spirals). These findings provide a cautionary note to previous research based on cross-sectional or lagged designs and using regression or (traditional or random intercept) cross-lagged analyses. By taking a resource perspective, our research provides an impetus for understanding change-related reciprocal relations between resources and job insecurity.</p>","PeriodicalId":48330,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology","volume":"96 3","pages":"646-668"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/joop.12440","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/joop.12440","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Based on gain and loss spiral principles from Conservation of Resources (COR) theory, we examined change-related reciprocal relations between three key resources (i.e. self-esteem, sense of belonging and perceived social support) and job insecurity. We adopted a latent change score (LCS) approach and examined the loss and gain spirals with a seven-wave longitudinal dataset from the New Zealand Attitudes and Values Study (N = 6518). The LCS models indicated that: (1) self-esteem predicts decreased job insecurity, but not vice versa, (2) sense of belonging predicts decreased job insecurity, but not vice versa and (3) there is a change-related reciprocal relationship between perceived social support and job insecurity. Inconsistent with the primacy of resource loss proposed by COR theory, we also confirm that the effects of self-esteem, sense of belonging and perceived social support on changes in job insecurity (i.e., gain spirals) are stronger than the effects of job insecurity on changes in these three resources (i.e., loss spirals). These findings provide a cautionary note to previous research based on cross-sectional or lagged designs and using regression or (traditional or random intercept) cross-lagged analyses. By taking a resource perspective, our research provides an impetus for understanding change-related reciprocal relations between resources and job insecurity.

Abstract Image

得失螺旋:资源和工作不安全感之间的相互关系
基于资源守恒(COR)理论的得失螺旋原理,我们研究了自尊、归属感和感知社会支持这三种关键资源与工作不安全感之间的变化相关互惠关系。我们采用了潜在变化评分(LCS)方法,并使用来自新西兰态度和价值观研究(N = 6518)的七波纵向数据集检查了损失和收益螺旋。LCS模型表明:(1)自尊能预测工作不安全感的降低,反之不能;(2)归属感能预测工作不安全感的降低,反之不能;(3)感知社会支持与工作不安全感之间存在变化相关的互惠关系。自尊、归属感和感知社会支持对工作不安全感变化(即获得螺旋)的影响强于工作不安全感对这三种资源变化(即损失螺旋)的影响,这与COR理论提出的资源损失的首要性不一致。这些发现为以前基于横截面或滞后设计以及使用回归或(传统或随机截距)交叉滞后分析的研究提供了警示。通过资源视角,我们的研究为理解资源与工作不安全感之间的变化相关互惠关系提供了动力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
4.80%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: The Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology aims to increase understanding of people and organisations at work including: - industrial, organizational, work, vocational and personnel psychology - behavioural and cognitive aspects of industrial relations - ergonomics and human factors Innovative or interdisciplinary approaches with a psychological emphasis are particularly welcome. So are papers which develop the links between occupational/organisational psychology and other areas of the discipline, such as social and cognitive psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信