Antecedents of Work Engagement in the Public Sector: A Systematic Literature Review

IF 4.2 3区管理学 Q1 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION

Review of Public Personnel Administration Pub Date : 2022-06-14 DOI:10.1177/0734371X221106792

N. Zahari, Maniam Kaliannan

{"title":"Antecedents of Work Engagement in the Public Sector: A Systematic Literature Review","authors":"N. Zahari, Maniam Kaliannan","doi":"10.1177/0734371X221106792","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article systematically reviewed the body of literature concerning work engagement in public organizations, aiming to examine the antecedents of work engagement in the public sector. Web of Science and Scopus, two prominent journal databases, were utilized to identify relevant literature. Adopting the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) approach, a final of 48 articles were systematically analyzed as research samples. The review identified five main themes: organizational and team factors, perceived leadership, job-related experience, individual, and organizational intervention factors. Generally, most studies reviewed emphasized individual and job-design-related factors as antecedents of work engagement in the public sector. Only minimal emphasis has been placed on organizational intervention compared to the other factors. This study also found that most literature addressed a single or a few themes of work engagement antecedents instead of a comprehensive work engagement model comprising all related aspects. This systematic review ends with directions for future studies to aid future scholars.","PeriodicalId":47609,"journal":{"name":"Review of Public Personnel Administration","volume":"43 1","pages":"557 - 582"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Public Personnel Administration","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X221106792","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 9

Abstract

This article systematically reviewed the body of literature concerning work engagement in public organizations, aiming to examine the antecedents of work engagement in the public sector. Web of Science and Scopus, two prominent journal databases, were utilized to identify relevant literature. Adopting the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) approach, a final of 48 articles were systematically analyzed as research samples. The review identified five main themes: organizational and team factors, perceived leadership, job-related experience, individual, and organizational intervention factors. Generally, most studies reviewed emphasized individual and job-design-related factors as antecedents of work engagement in the public sector. Only minimal emphasis has been placed on organizational intervention compared to the other factors. This study also found that most literature addressed a single or a few themes of work engagement antecedents instead of a comprehensive work engagement model comprising all related aspects. This systematic review ends with directions for future studies to aid future scholars.

查看原文本刊更多论文

公共部门工作投入的前因:系统的文献回顾

本文系统地回顾了有关公共组织工作参与的大量文献，旨在考察公共部门工作参与的前因。利用Web of Science和Scopus这两个著名的期刊数据库来识别相关文献。采用系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目（PRISMA）方法，对48篇文章作为研究样本进行了系统分析。该综述确定了五个主要主题：组织和团队因素、感知领导力、工作相关经验、个人和组织干预因素。一般来说，所审查的大多数研究都强调个人和工作设计相关因素是公共部门工作参与的前因。与其他因素相比，对组织干预的重视程度最低。这项研究还发现，大多数文献都涉及工作参与前因的单个或几个主题，而不是包括所有相关方面的综合工作参与模型。这篇系统的综述最后指出了未来研究的方向，以帮助未来的学者。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Review of Public Personnel Administration PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION-

CiteScore

9.70

自引率

7.70%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Review of Public Personnel Administration publishes articles that reflect the varied approaches and methodologies used in the study and practice of public human resources management and labor.