Impact of Concrete-Pictorial-Abstract Approach with Collaborative Lesson Research on Year Four Pupils’ Proficiency in Volume

Q4 Social Sciences
Mohd Shafian Shafiee, Chew Cheng Meng
{"title":"Impact of Concrete-Pictorial-Abstract Approach with Collaborative Lesson Research on Year Four Pupils’ Proficiency in Volume","authors":"Mohd Shafian Shafiee, Chew Cheng Meng","doi":"10.21315/apjee2023.38.1.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to determine the impact of concrete-pictorial-abstract (CPA) approach with collaborative lesson research (CLR) on Year Four pupils’ proficiency in volume. The counterbalanced research design, which consisted of three different groups of year four pupils with three treatments applied to each group, was used with the Proficiency in Volume Test (PVT) administered before and after each of the three CLR cycles. Cluster sampling was used to select three groups of 115 Year Four pupils consisting of 59 males and 56 females. PVT consisted of five questions based on the five strands of proficiency in volume: Q1 (conceptual understanding), Q2 (procedural fluency), Q3 (strategic competence), Q4 (adaptive reasoning), and Q5 (productive disposition). It has a total score of 15 and the indicators of proficiency in volume are low proficiency (0–4), average proficiency (5–10), and high proficiency (11–15). The data were analysed using the paired-sampleCLR cycles-test and one-way ANOVA in SPSS version 24. The results of the paired-sample t-test showed that there was a significant difference between the mean scores of the pre- and post-tests for each CLR cycle. The results of the paired-sample t-test for cube in the first, second and third cycles of CLR were: t = –6.74, df = 37, p < 0.05; t = –19.82, df = 37, p < 0.05; and t = –22.10, df = 38, p < 0.05, respectively. The results of the paired-sample t-test for cuboid in the first, second and third cycles of CLR were: t = 3.15, df = 37, p < 0.05; t = 9.87, df = 38, p < 0.05; and t = 20.76, df = 37, p < 0.05, respectively. The results of oneway ANOVA showed that there was a significant in the post-test mean scores between the first, second and third CLR cycles. The result of one-way ANOVA for cube was F (2,112) = 53.32, p < 0.05, while for cuboid it was F (2,112) = 71.16, p < 0.05. The CLR cycles carried out helped teachers in developing better teaching plans based on the CPA approach as well as enhancing Year Four pupils’ proficiency in volume.","PeriodicalId":36930,"journal":{"name":"Asia Pacific Journal of Educators and Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Pacific Journal of Educators and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21315/apjee2023.38.1.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the impact of concrete-pictorial-abstract (CPA) approach with collaborative lesson research (CLR) on Year Four pupils’ proficiency in volume. The counterbalanced research design, which consisted of three different groups of year four pupils with three treatments applied to each group, was used with the Proficiency in Volume Test (PVT) administered before and after each of the three CLR cycles. Cluster sampling was used to select three groups of 115 Year Four pupils consisting of 59 males and 56 females. PVT consisted of five questions based on the five strands of proficiency in volume: Q1 (conceptual understanding), Q2 (procedural fluency), Q3 (strategic competence), Q4 (adaptive reasoning), and Q5 (productive disposition). It has a total score of 15 and the indicators of proficiency in volume are low proficiency (0–4), average proficiency (5–10), and high proficiency (11–15). The data were analysed using the paired-sampleCLR cycles-test and one-way ANOVA in SPSS version 24. The results of the paired-sample t-test showed that there was a significant difference between the mean scores of the pre- and post-tests for each CLR cycle. The results of the paired-sample t-test for cube in the first, second and third cycles of CLR were: t = –6.74, df = 37, p < 0.05; t = –19.82, df = 37, p < 0.05; and t = –22.10, df = 38, p < 0.05, respectively. The results of the paired-sample t-test for cuboid in the first, second and third cycles of CLR were: t = 3.15, df = 37, p < 0.05; t = 9.87, df = 38, p < 0.05; and t = 20.76, df = 37, p < 0.05, respectively. The results of oneway ANOVA showed that there was a significant in the post-test mean scores between the first, second and third CLR cycles. The result of one-way ANOVA for cube was F (2,112) = 53.32, p < 0.05, while for cuboid it was F (2,112) = 71.16, p < 0.05. The CLR cycles carried out helped teachers in developing better teaching plans based on the CPA approach as well as enhancing Year Four pupils’ proficiency in volume.
具象抽象教学法与合作课研究对四年级学生卷能力的影响
本研究旨在确定具体图像抽象(CPA)方法与合作课堂研究(CLR)对四年级学生卷能力的影响。平衡研究设计由三组不同的四年级学生组成,每组接受三种治疗,并在三个CLR周期前后进行容量能力测试(PVT)。采用整群抽样法选择了三组115名四年级学生,其中包括59名男性和56名女性。PVT由五个基于卷熟练程度的问题组成:Q1(概念理解)、Q2(程序流畅性)、Q3(战略能力)、Q4(适应性推理)和Q5(生产性倾向)。它的总分为15,音量熟练度指标为低熟练度(0-4)、平均熟练度(5-10)和高熟练度(11-15)。使用SPSS 24版中的配对样本CLR循环检验和单因素方差分析对数据进行分析。配对样本t检验的结果表明,每个CLR周期的测试前和测试后的平均得分之间存在显著差异。CLR第一、第二和第三周期立方体的配对样本t检验结果为:t=–6.74,df=37,p<0.05;t=–19.82,df=37,p<0.05;t=–22.10,df=38,p<0.05。CLR第一、第二和第三周期长方体的配对样本t检验结果为:t=3.15,df=37,p<0.05;t=9.87,df=38,p<0.05;t=20.76,df=37,p<0.05。单因素方差分析的结果表明,在第一、第二和第三个CLR周期之间,测试后的平均得分存在显著差异。立方体的单因素方差分析结果为F(2112)=53.32,p<0.05,而长方体的单因素变异分析结果为F。开展的CLR周期有助于教师根据CPA方法制定更好的教学计划,并提高四年级学生的音量熟练度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信