Educational ICT use outside school in the European Union: disparities by social origin, immigrant background, and gender

IF 2.1 3区 心理学 Q2 COMMUNICATION
Birgit Becker
{"title":"Educational ICT use outside school in the European Union: disparities by social origin, immigrant background, and gender","authors":"Birgit Becker","doi":"10.1080/17482798.2021.1902359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper analyzes inequalities in using information and communication technologies (ICTs) for educational activities outside school by social origin, immigrant background, and gender. It examines whether these inequalities just work additively or whether certain combinations of these groups are associated with specific advantages or disadvantages and which factors drive these differences. Data from the EU sample of the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2018 are used for the empirical analyses. The results show that male students with immigrant background and highly educated parents have the highest frequency of educational ICT use, while native female students with less educated parents show the lowest frequency. However, the group categories also interact: An academic family background is more advantageous for students with immigrant background and for boys than for native students and girls. The male advantage can be attributed to a general higher frequency of boys using ICTs in their free time, while the advantage of an academic family background is mainly due to a better endowment with educational resources at home. Implications for research and practice are discussed. IMPACT SUMMARY a. Prior State of Knowledge: Inequalities in students’ (offline) educational activities according to their social origin, immigrant background, and gender are well known. Differences in students’ ICT usage have been documented as well. However, the two literatures have hardly been combined so far. b. Novel Contributions: The paper examines whether inequalities in adolescents’ ICT use for educational purposes outside school exist according to social origin, immigrant background, and gender. It also analyzes how far these inequalities interact and which factors drive these inequalities. c. Practical Implications: As some social groups were shown to be less familiar with educational ICT use at home, all students should be supported in acquiring familiarity in using ICTs for educational purposes, e.g., by strengthening the inclusion of ICTs at school.","PeriodicalId":46908,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Children and Media","volume":"16 1","pages":"1 - 20"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17482798.2021.1902359","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Children and Media","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2021.1902359","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper analyzes inequalities in using information and communication technologies (ICTs) for educational activities outside school by social origin, immigrant background, and gender. It examines whether these inequalities just work additively or whether certain combinations of these groups are associated with specific advantages or disadvantages and which factors drive these differences. Data from the EU sample of the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2018 are used for the empirical analyses. The results show that male students with immigrant background and highly educated parents have the highest frequency of educational ICT use, while native female students with less educated parents show the lowest frequency. However, the group categories also interact: An academic family background is more advantageous for students with immigrant background and for boys than for native students and girls. The male advantage can be attributed to a general higher frequency of boys using ICTs in their free time, while the advantage of an academic family background is mainly due to a better endowment with educational resources at home. Implications for research and practice are discussed. IMPACT SUMMARY a. Prior State of Knowledge: Inequalities in students’ (offline) educational activities according to their social origin, immigrant background, and gender are well known. Differences in students’ ICT usage have been documented as well. However, the two literatures have hardly been combined so far. b. Novel Contributions: The paper examines whether inequalities in adolescents’ ICT use for educational purposes outside school exist according to social origin, immigrant background, and gender. It also analyzes how far these inequalities interact and which factors drive these inequalities. c. Practical Implications: As some social groups were shown to be less familiar with educational ICT use at home, all students should be supported in acquiring familiarity in using ICTs for educational purposes, e.g., by strengthening the inclusion of ICTs at school.
欧洲联盟校外教育信息和通信技术使用情况:按社会出身、移民背景和性别划分的差异
摘要本文分析了社会出身、移民背景和性别在校外教育活动中使用信息和通信技术的不平等现象。它考察了这些不平等是否只是相加作用,或者这些群体的某些组合是否与特定的优势或劣势有关,以及哪些因素导致了这些差异。来自2018年国际学生评估计划(PISA)欧盟样本的数据用于实证分析。研究结果表明,移民背景和父母受过高等教育的男生使用教育信息通信技术的频率最高,而父母受教育程度较低的本土女生使用教育信息通讯技术的频率最低。然而,群体类别也相互作用:学术家庭背景对移民背景的学生和男孩来说比对本地学生和女孩更有利。男性的优势可归因于男孩在空闲时间使用信息和通信技术的频率普遍较高,而学术家庭背景的优势主要是因为家里有更好的教育资源。讨论了对研究和实践的启示。影响总结a.先前的知识状况:众所周知,根据社会出身、移民背景和性别,学生(离线)教育活动中的不平等现象。学生使用信息和通信技术的差异也有记录。然而,到目前为止,这两篇文献几乎没有结合在一起。b.新的贡献:该论文根据社会出身、移民背景和性别,研究了青少年在校外用于教育目的的信息和通信技术方面是否存在不平等。它还分析了这些不平等在多大程度上相互作用,以及哪些因素导致了这些不公平。c.实际影响:由于一些社会群体不太熟悉在家中使用教育信息和通信技术,因此应支持所有学生熟悉将信息和通信科技用于教育目的,例如,加强在学校使用信息和通信技能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.30%
发文量
26
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信