Special Issue on Chinese Culinary Regionalism: Introduction

M. King
{"title":"Special Issue on Chinese Culinary Regionalism: Introduction","authors":"M. King","doi":"10.1080/20549547.2020.1770490","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Wherever we go in the world, culinary regionalism appears as a potent (and delicious) form of local pride. Here in North Carolina, where I live, aficionados passionately defend the merits of their particular style of barbecue, complete with guides, maps, festivals, and smoke-offs. Eastern Carolina barbecue centers on smoking a whole hog over a wood fire, finished with a vinegar and pepper sauce, while Western Carolina barbecue (also known as Lexington or Piedmont-style) uses only pork shoulder, with a red sauce featuring ketchup, vinegar, and other spices. Either way, real barbecue for partisans in this state means pulled pork – if you’re looking for beef, head west out of the state toward Kansas City or Texas. Yet culinary regionalism offers more than just opportunities for local boosterism and friendly rivalries: it deserves closer consideration as a general phenomenon within food studies and food history. First, though, we need to make a basic distinction between the explanatory potential of culinary regions vs. culinary regionalism. The perspective of the former is enumerative and descriptive, while the perspective of the latter is systemic and comprehensive. Understanding culinary regionalism as a phenomenon goes far beyond naming the seven culinary regions of Mexico, for example, or listing the specialty dishes of each of India’s twenty-eight states. Instead, investigating culinary regionalism involves posing questions such as: Who gets to define culinary regions? When do specific culinary regions matter and why? How do culinary regions and identities emerge, and how do they change? How is culinary regionalism distinct from or related to other forms of regionalism, such as linguistic, ethnic, or economic? Of particular interest here is the relationship between culinary regions and culinary nation: do regional culinary identities rival national culinary identities, or are they mutually constitutive? How do regional and national identities affect one another, and what about the interactions between regional cuisines? Moreover, how are all of these culinary relationships expressed or shaped on the ground by different groups, at different points time? This special issue of Global Food History is devoted to an examination of the dynamics of culinary regionalism in China, through four separate case studies. Globally, one could argue that culinary regionalism reaches its apogee in China: it is the most populous and fourth-largest country in the world, boasting dozens of distinct and historic regional cuisines scattered over a diverse landscape of rice paddies in the east and south, wheat fields in the north, and mountainous pasturelands in the west. This welter of food identities and regions is often defined by province (Sichuanese, Hunanese, Cantonese, etc.), city (Shanghainese, Beijing, Hong Kong, etc.), ethnic groups concentrated in specific regions (Hakka, Uyghur, etc.), or even specific dishes (knife-shaved noodles of Shanxi, Peking roast duck, West Lake vinegar fish, etc.). GLOBAL FOOD HISTORY 2020, VOL. 6, NO. 2, 85–88 https://doi.org/10.1080/20549547.2020.1770490","PeriodicalId":92780,"journal":{"name":"Global food history","volume":"6 1","pages":"85 - 88"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/20549547.2020.1770490","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global food history","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20549547.2020.1770490","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Wherever we go in the world, culinary regionalism appears as a potent (and delicious) form of local pride. Here in North Carolina, where I live, aficionados passionately defend the merits of their particular style of barbecue, complete with guides, maps, festivals, and smoke-offs. Eastern Carolina barbecue centers on smoking a whole hog over a wood fire, finished with a vinegar and pepper sauce, while Western Carolina barbecue (also known as Lexington or Piedmont-style) uses only pork shoulder, with a red sauce featuring ketchup, vinegar, and other spices. Either way, real barbecue for partisans in this state means pulled pork – if you’re looking for beef, head west out of the state toward Kansas City or Texas. Yet culinary regionalism offers more than just opportunities for local boosterism and friendly rivalries: it deserves closer consideration as a general phenomenon within food studies and food history. First, though, we need to make a basic distinction between the explanatory potential of culinary regions vs. culinary regionalism. The perspective of the former is enumerative and descriptive, while the perspective of the latter is systemic and comprehensive. Understanding culinary regionalism as a phenomenon goes far beyond naming the seven culinary regions of Mexico, for example, or listing the specialty dishes of each of India’s twenty-eight states. Instead, investigating culinary regionalism involves posing questions such as: Who gets to define culinary regions? When do specific culinary regions matter and why? How do culinary regions and identities emerge, and how do they change? How is culinary regionalism distinct from or related to other forms of regionalism, such as linguistic, ethnic, or economic? Of particular interest here is the relationship between culinary regions and culinary nation: do regional culinary identities rival national culinary identities, or are they mutually constitutive? How do regional and national identities affect one another, and what about the interactions between regional cuisines? Moreover, how are all of these culinary relationships expressed or shaped on the ground by different groups, at different points time? This special issue of Global Food History is devoted to an examination of the dynamics of culinary regionalism in China, through four separate case studies. Globally, one could argue that culinary regionalism reaches its apogee in China: it is the most populous and fourth-largest country in the world, boasting dozens of distinct and historic regional cuisines scattered over a diverse landscape of rice paddies in the east and south, wheat fields in the north, and mountainous pasturelands in the west. This welter of food identities and regions is often defined by province (Sichuanese, Hunanese, Cantonese, etc.), city (Shanghainese, Beijing, Hong Kong, etc.), ethnic groups concentrated in specific regions (Hakka, Uyghur, etc.), or even specific dishes (knife-shaved noodles of Shanxi, Peking roast duck, West Lake vinegar fish, etc.). GLOBAL FOOD HISTORY 2020, VOL. 6, NO. 2, 85–88 https://doi.org/10.1080/20549547.2020.1770490
中国烹饪地域主义特刊:导论
无论我们走到世界的哪个地方,烹饪地域主义似乎都是当地自豪感的一种强有力的(和美味的)形式。在我居住的北卡罗来纳州,狂热的烧烤爱好者们热情地捍卫着他们独特的烧烤方式的优点,包括指南、地图、节日和吸烟。东卡罗来纳州的烧烤主要是在柴火上熏整头猪,最后用醋和辣椒酱完成,而西卡罗来纳州的烧烤(也被称为列克星敦或皮埃蒙特风格)只使用猪肩肉,用番茄酱、醋和其他香料制成的红酱。不管怎样,对于这个州的游击队员来说,真正的烧烤意味着手撕猪肉——如果你想找牛肉,那就向西到堪萨斯城或德克萨斯州去。然而,烹饪地域主义提供的不仅仅是地方支持者和友好竞争的机会:它作为食品研究和食品历史中的普遍现象值得更仔细地考虑。不过,首先,我们需要对烹饪区域的解释潜力与烹饪地域主义进行基本区分。前者的视角是列举性的、描述性的,后者的视角是系统性的、综合性的。例如,将烹饪地域主义作为一种现象来理解,远不止是说出墨西哥的七个烹饪地区,或者列出印度28个州每个州的特色菜肴。相反,调查烹饪地域主义涉及提出这样的问题:谁来定义烹饪区域?具体的烹饪区域什么时候重要,为什么重要?烹饪区域和身份是如何产生的,它们又是如何变化的?烹饪地域主义与其他形式的地域主义(如语言、种族或经济)有何不同或相关?这里特别有趣的是烹饪地区和烹饪民族之间的关系:地区烹饪身份是与国家烹饪身份相竞争的,还是它们相互构成?地区和国家的身份是如何相互影响的,地区菜系之间又是如何相互影响的?此外,在不同的时间点,不同的群体是如何表达或塑造所有这些烹饪关系的?本期《全球食物史》专刊通过四个独立的案例研究,对中国烹饪地域主义的动态进行了考察。在全球范围内,人们可能会说,烹饪地域主义在中国达到了顶峰:中国是世界上人口最多、面积第四大的国家,拥有几十种独特而历史悠久的地方美食,分布在东部和南部的稻田、北部的麦田和西部的山区牧场。这种食物身份和地域的混乱往往是由省(四川、湖南、广东等)、市(上海、北京、香港等)、集中在特定地区的民族(客家、维吾尔族等),甚至是特定的菜肴(山西刀削面、北京烤鸭、西湖醋鱼等)来定义的。全球食品史2020,第6卷,第6期。2,85 - 88 https://doi.org/10.1080/20549547.2020.1770490
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信