Data Journalism Teaching, Fast and Slow

Q2 Social Sciences

Asia Pacific Media Educator Pub Date : 2018-05-01 DOI:10.1177/1326365X18769395

P. Bradshaw

引用次数: 10

Abstract

This commentary draws on a decade’s experience of teaching data journalism within a variety of contexts to describe the lessons learned regarding different pedagogical techniques and choices about the aspects of data journalism to teach. What emerges is a difference between classes aimed at a general audience, who might be sceptical and/or ignorant of the diversity of data journalism practice and those aimed at a more specialist audience aiming to go into the increasing numbers of roles dedicated to data-driven techniques.

查看原文本刊更多论文

数据新闻教学，快与慢

这篇评论借鉴了十年来在各种背景下教授数据新闻的经验，描述了从不同的教学技术和数据新闻教学方面的选择中吸取的教训。出现的是针对普通受众的课程之间的差异，这些受众可能对数据新闻实践的多样性持怀疑态度和/或无知，而针对更专业的受众的课程则旨在进入越来越多的致力于数据驱动技术的角色。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Asia Pacific Media Educator COMMUNICATION-

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Asia Pacific Media Educator is an international refereed journal published twice a year by SAGE Publications (New Delhi) in collaboration with the School of the Arts, English and Media, Faculty of Law, Humanities and the Arts, University of Wollongong in Australia. The journal follows international norms and procedures of blind peer reviewing by scholars representing a wide range of multi-disciplinary areas. APME focuses on generating discussions and dialogues among media educators, researchers and journalists. Content ranges from critical commentaries and essays to research reports and papers that contribute to journalism theory development and offer innovative ideas in improving the standard and currency of media reportage, teaching and training specific to the Asia Pacific region. Papers that integrate media theories with applications to professional practice, media training and journalism education are usually selected for peer review. APME also carries a Q&A section with book authors. APME takes conventional book reviews to a more creative level where reviewers directly engage with authors to understand the process that authors take in researching and writing the book, clarify their assumptions and pose critical questions.