Theorizing necropolitics in social studies education

IF 2.5 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Bretton A. Varga, Mark E. Helmsing, C. van Kessel, Rebecca C. Christ
{"title":"Theorizing necropolitics in social studies education","authors":"Bretton A. Varga, Mark E. Helmsing, C. van Kessel, Rebecca C. Christ","doi":"10.1080/00933104.2022.2129536","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article engages with three commonly traversed social studies topics—depictions of violence and death from the French Revolution, during the Vietnam War, and regarding U.S. histories of racial segregation—through the lens of Achille Mbembe’s necropolitics (i.e., political and social machinations of power that determine who lives and who dies). In particular, this article theorizes how specific necropolitical concepts (e.g., necropower, the living dead, and slow death) can be a generative and powerful form of analysis for social studies educators and their students that exposes intersecting complexities between life, death, political alliance, and power. While this article argues that social studies curriculum is replete with undertheorized moments of death and underutilized opportunities to engage with death, this scholarship is guided by the questions: “What place is given to life, death, and the human body (in particular the wounded or slain body)? How are they inscribed in the order of power?” The overall aim of a necropolitical engagement is to foster a deeper understanding of why/how death continues to disproportionately come into being again and again for specific, targeted peoples.","PeriodicalId":46808,"journal":{"name":"Theory and Research in Social Education","volume":"51 1","pages":"47 - 71"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theory and Research in Social Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2022.2129536","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article engages with three commonly traversed social studies topics—depictions of violence and death from the French Revolution, during the Vietnam War, and regarding U.S. histories of racial segregation—through the lens of Achille Mbembe’s necropolitics (i.e., political and social machinations of power that determine who lives and who dies). In particular, this article theorizes how specific necropolitical concepts (e.g., necropower, the living dead, and slow death) can be a generative and powerful form of analysis for social studies educators and their students that exposes intersecting complexities between life, death, political alliance, and power. While this article argues that social studies curriculum is replete with undertheorized moments of death and underutilized opportunities to engage with death, this scholarship is guided by the questions: “What place is given to life, death, and the human body (in particular the wounded or slain body)? How are they inscribed in the order of power?” The overall aim of a necropolitical engagement is to foster a deeper understanding of why/how death continues to disproportionately come into being again and again for specific, targeted peoples.
社会学教育中的死亡政治理论化
本文通过阿基利·姆本贝(Achille Mbembe)的死亡政治(即决定谁生谁死的政治和社会权力阴谋)的视角,探讨了三个常见的社会研究主题——对法国大革命、越南战争期间的暴力和死亡的描述,以及关于美国种族隔离历史的描述。特别是,这篇文章理论化了具体的死亡政治概念(例如,死亡权力,活死人和缓慢死亡)如何成为社会研究教育者及其学生的一种生成和强大的分析形式,揭示了生命,死亡,政治联盟和权力之间交叉的复杂性。虽然这篇文章认为,社会研究课程充满了未被理论化的死亡时刻和未被充分利用的与死亡接触的机会,但这种学术研究是由以下问题指导的:“生命、死亡和人体(特别是受伤或被杀害的身体)被赋予了什么位置?”它们是如何按权力顺序排列的?”死亡政治接触的总体目标是促进对死亡为何/如何一次又一次地不成比例地出现在特定的、有针对性的人群中的更深层次的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Theory and Research in Social Education
Theory and Research in Social Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
30.80%
发文量
36
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信