{"title":"Platform Studies in Education","authors":"T. Nichols, Antero Garcia","doi":"10.17763/1943-5045-92.2.209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this introductory essay in the “Platform Studies in Education” symposium, T. Philip Nichols and Antero Garcia consider the expanding role of platform technologies in teaching, learning, and administration and the contributions of education research to the emerging multidisciplinary literature of platform studies. Their essay outlines theoretical lineages that identify platforms not as standalone tools but as multisided markets linking their users to competing social, technical, and political-economic imperatives. It also highlights connections to related education research that demonstrates the impact of these conflicting imperatives for equitable student learning, teacher education, and policy making. The authors conclude by reflecting on the critical interventions that greater attention to platform relations in education might offer and the forms of coalitional work, across disciplinary and geographic borders, needed to realize these potentials.","PeriodicalId":48207,"journal":{"name":"Harvard Educational Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Harvard Educational Review","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17763/1943-5045-92.2.209","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
Abstract
In this introductory essay in the “Platform Studies in Education” symposium, T. Philip Nichols and Antero Garcia consider the expanding role of platform technologies in teaching, learning, and administration and the contributions of education research to the emerging multidisciplinary literature of platform studies. Their essay outlines theoretical lineages that identify platforms not as standalone tools but as multisided markets linking their users to competing social, technical, and political-economic imperatives. It also highlights connections to related education research that demonstrates the impact of these conflicting imperatives for equitable student learning, teacher education, and policy making. The authors conclude by reflecting on the critical interventions that greater attention to platform relations in education might offer and the forms of coalitional work, across disciplinary and geographic borders, needed to realize these potentials.
在“教育中的平台研究”研讨会的这篇介绍性文章中,T. Philip Nichols和Antero Garcia考虑了平台技术在教学、学习和管理方面不断扩大的作用,以及教育研究对新兴的多学科平台研究文献的贡献。他们的文章概述了理论谱系,认为平台不是独立的工具,而是将其用户与竞争的社会、技术和政治经济需求联系起来的多边市场。它还强调了与相关教育研究的联系,这些研究证明了这些相互冲突的必要性对公平的学生学习、教师教育和政策制定的影响。作者通过反思对教育平台关系的更多关注可能提供的关键干预措施,以及跨学科和地理边界的联合工作形式,来实现这些潜力。
期刊介绍:
The Harvard Educational Review (HER) accepts contributions from researchers, scholars, policy makers, practitioners, teachers, students, and informed observers in education and related fields. In addition to original reports of research and theory, HER welcomes articles that reflect on teaching and practice in educational settings in the United States and abroad.