Why Teach? A Project-ive Life-world Approach to Understanding What Teaching Means for Teachers

IF 0.9 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Brittany Landrum, Catherine Guilbeau, G. Garza
{"title":"Why Teach? A Project-ive Life-world Approach to Understanding What Teaching Means for Teachers","authors":"Brittany Landrum, Catherine Guilbeau, G. Garza","doi":"10.17583/QRE.2017.2947","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Previous literature has examined teachers’ motivations to teach in terms of intrinsic and extrinsic motives, personality dimensions, and teacher burnout. These findings have been cast in the rubric of differences between teachers and non-teachers and the linear relations between these measures among teachers. Utilizing a phenomenological approach (Giorgi, 1970) to analyze data generated in structured interviews with four tenured professors from small, liberal arts universities whose central mission is teaching, this paper presents the telic or project-ive horizons of teaching – those motives aimed at what is ‘not yet’ (Heidegger, 1927/1962). Results revealed that teaching is understood by teachers to be a dialogical enterprise between a teacher and learners across dimensions of transformation, knowledge, and personhood. This dialogue entailed an abiding tension between self and other, activity and passivity, giving and receiving, preparation and spontaneity, instructing and learning, leading and following, asserting and withdrawing. It comprised an orientation to a teachers’ vision for the possible future personhood of the teacher and their students and to the character of the world which teachers and learners inhabit together. These findings are discussed in terms of the reviewed literature and as a case in point for a vital complementarity of research approaches.","PeriodicalId":42606,"journal":{"name":"Qualitative Research in Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Qualitative Research in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17583/QRE.2017.2947","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Previous literature has examined teachers’ motivations to teach in terms of intrinsic and extrinsic motives, personality dimensions, and teacher burnout. These findings have been cast in the rubric of differences between teachers and non-teachers and the linear relations between these measures among teachers. Utilizing a phenomenological approach (Giorgi, 1970) to analyze data generated in structured interviews with four tenured professors from small, liberal arts universities whose central mission is teaching, this paper presents the telic or project-ive horizons of teaching – those motives aimed at what is ‘not yet’ (Heidegger, 1927/1962). Results revealed that teaching is understood by teachers to be a dialogical enterprise between a teacher and learners across dimensions of transformation, knowledge, and personhood. This dialogue entailed an abiding tension between self and other, activity and passivity, giving and receiving, preparation and spontaneity, instructing and learning, leading and following, asserting and withdrawing. It comprised an orientation to a teachers’ vision for the possible future personhood of the teacher and their students and to the character of the world which teachers and learners inhabit together. These findings are discussed in terms of the reviewed literature and as a case in point for a vital complementarity of research approaches.
为什么要教书?理解教学对教师意味着什么的项目生活世界方法
以往的文献从内在和外在动机、人格维度和教师倦怠等方面考察了教师的教学动机。这些发现被纳入了教师和非教师之间的差异以及教师之间这些衡量标准之间的线性关系的范畴。本文利用现象学方法(Giorgi,1970)分析了四位以教学为中心的小型文科大学终身教授的结构化访谈中产生的数据,提出了教学的telic或projective视野——这些动机旨在“尚未”(Heidegger,1927/1962)。研究结果表明,教师将教学理解为教师和学习者之间在转变、知识和人格维度上的对话企业。这种对话在自我与他人、主动与被动、给予与接受、准备与自发性、指导与学习、引导与跟随、主张与退缩之间产生了持久的紧张关系。它包括教师对教师及其学生未来可能的人格的愿景,以及教师和学习者共同生活的世界的特征的定位。这些发现在综述的文献中进行了讨论,并作为研究方法至关重要的互补性的一个例子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Qualitative Research in Education
Qualitative Research in Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
4
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信